Continuous and changing stakeholder engagement for organisational sustainability: Proposing the stakeholder engagement flow model

被引:0
|
作者
Fobbe, Lea [1 ]
Niss, Camilla [2 ]
Hilletofth, Per [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gavle, Dept Ind Management Ind Design & Mech Engn, Kungsbacksvagen 47, S-80176 Gavle, Sweden
[2] Univ Gavle, Fac Educ & Business Studies, Gavle, Sweden
关键词
operational sustainability practices; stakeholder engagement; stakeholder theory; sustainable business models; IDENTIFYING INNOVATIVE SUPPLIERS; CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY; BUSINESS MODELS; MANAGEMENT; CREATION; DEVELOP; DESIGN; TOOL;
D O I
10.1002/csr.2908
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Stakeholder engagement has been at the forefront of the organisational sustainability debate, particularly focusing on operational sustainability practices (OSP). While sustainability literature increasingly focuses on sustainable business models (SBMs) and the relationship to OSP, research on stakeholder engagement in SBMs and how this relates to engagement in OSP has been scarce. Based on case study research, this paper contributes to the debate by first providing empirical evidence on engagement practices for implementing SBMs. Second, this paper proposes the stakeholder engagement flow model, highlighting how stakeholder engagement for implementing SBMs need to be adapted in relation to stakeholder engagement in OSP. While stakeholder engagement is often continuous for a broad range of stakeholders, successfully implementing SBMs may also require changing engagement practices both in terms of engagement approach and role of stakeholders. The results advance the theoretical debate on stakeholder engagement for organisational sustainability and support practitioners to rethink and evaluate their stakeholder engagement efforts when aiming to implement OSP and SBMs.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accounting for stakeholder engagement in developing countries: proposing an engagement system to respond to sustainability demands
    Asogwa, Ikenna Elias
    Varua, Maria Estela
    Datt, Rina
    Humphreys, Peter
    [J]. MEDITARI ACCOUNTANCY RESEARCH, 2024, 32 (03) : 888 - 922
  • [2] Stakeholder engagement in business models for sustainability: The stakeholder value flow model for sustainable development
    Attanasio, Giovanna
    Preghenella, Nadia
    De Toni, Alberto Felice
    Battistella, Cinzia
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (03) : 860 - 874
  • [3] Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: A classification model
    Stocker, Fabricio
    de Arruda, Michelle P.
    de Mascena, Keysa M. C.
    Boaventura, Joao M. G.
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (05) : 2071 - 2080
  • [4] Stakeholder Relationships, Engagement, and Sustainability Reporting
    Herremans, Irene M.
    Nazari, Jamal A.
    Mahmoudian, Fereshteh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2016, 138 (03) : 417 - 435
  • [5] Valuing Stakeholder Engagement and Sustainability Reporting
    Camilleri M.A.
    [J]. Corporate Reputation Review, 2015, 18 (3) : 210 - 222
  • [6] Stakeholder Relationships, Engagement, and Sustainability Reporting
    Irene M. Herremans
    Jamal A. Nazari
    Fereshteh Mahmoudian
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, 138 : 417 - 435
  • [7] A typology of organisational stakeholder engagement with place brand identity
    Helmi, Jessica
    Bridson, Kerrie
    Casidy, Riza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC MARKETING, 2020, 28 (07) : 620 - 638
  • [8] The stakeholder engagement in Spanish hotels' sustainability reports
    Jesus Bonilla-Priego, Maria
    Maria Benitez-Hernandez, Patricia
    [J]. REVISTA DE CONTABILIDAD-SPANISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2017, 20 (02) : 157 - 166
  • [9] Stakeholder Engagement: Achieving Sustainability in the Construction Sector
    Bal, Menoka
    Bryde, David
    Fearon, Damian
    Ochieng, Edward
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (02): : 695 - 710
  • [10] Stakeholder engagement, social auditing and corporate sustainability
    Gao, Simon S.
    Zhang, Jane J.
    [J]. BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 12 (06) : 722 - 740