Third-line or fourth-line chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with relatively good performance status

被引:14
|
作者
Chen, Yuh-Min [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shih, Jen-Fu [1 ]
Fan, Wen-Chien [4 ]
Wu, Chieh-Hung [1 ]
Chou, Kun-Ta [1 ]
Tsai, Chun-Ming [1 ]
Lee, Yu-Chin [1 ]
Perng, Reury-Perng [1 ]
Whang-Peng, Jacqueline [3 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Chest Dept, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Univ Sch Med, Dept Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, CECR, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Chutung Vet Hosp, Dept Med, Chutung, Hsinchu County, Taiwan
关键词
Adenocarcinoma; Chemotherapy; Docetaxel; Non-small-cell lung cancer; Pemetrexed; PHASE-III TRIAL; DOCETAXEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcma.2011.03.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Our aim here was to explore treatment efficacy of pemetrexed and docetaxel in non-small-cell lung cancer patients who had failed previous chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of our non-small-cell lung cancer patients who received third- or fourth-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed or docetaxel in our institution from January 2006 to December 2009. Results: One hundred and twenty-three patients received treatment, including 85 patients with pemetrexed treatment and 38 patients with docetaxel treatment. There was no difference in tumor response rate and toxicity profiles when using pemetrexed as third- or fourth-line treatment, neither was there difference in docetaxel treatment of third- versus fourth-line treatment. There was also no difference between docetaxel and pemetrexed in response rate and control rate when they were used as fourth-line treatment. However, docetaxel used in fourth-line treatment had higher incidence of neutropenia and more frequent need of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support compared with pemetrexed in fourth-line treatment. Median progression-free survivals (PFSs) were 2.6 months and 3.8 months when using pemetrexed as third- and fourth-line treatment, respectively (p = 0.417). Median PFSs were 3.8 months and 4.8 months when using docetaxel as third- and fourth-line treatment, respectively (p = 0.882). There was also no difference in PFS between pemetrexed and docetaxel, both in third- and fourth-line treatment. Median survivals were 13.4, 12.2, 13.2, and 13 months for pemetrexed in third-line, fourth-line, and docetaxel in third-line and fourth-line treatment, respectively. Conclusion: This retrospective study of pemetrexed and docetaxel showed relatively safe toxicity profile, reasonable response rate, and long survival when used as third- and fourth-line chemotherapy. Thus, it is reasonable to give good performance status patients third- and fourth-line chemotherapy. A phase III randomized trial is needed for better clarification of these issues. Copyright (C) 2011 Elsevier Taiwan LLC and the Chinese Medical Association. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 214
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy and safety of amurubicin for the elderly patients with refractory relapsed small cell lung cancer as third-line chemotherapy
    Asai, Nobuhiro
    Ohkuni, Yoshihiro
    Matsunuma, Ryo
    Nakashima, Kei
    Iwasaki, Takuya
    Kaneko, Norihiro
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 8 (02) : 266 - 271
  • [42] Combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and ifosfamide as the third-line regimen in patients with heavily pretreated small cell lung cancer
    Park, Sarah
    Ahn, Myung Ju
    Ahn, Jin Seok
    Lee, Jeeyun
    Hong, Yong Sang
    Park, Byeong-Bae
    Lee, Sang Chul
    Hwang, In Gyu
    Park, Joon Oh
    Lim, Hoyeong
    Kang, Won Ki
    Park, Keunchil
    LUNG CANCER, 2007, 58 (01) : 116 - 122
  • [43] The efficacy of pemetrexed as a third- or fourth-line therapy and the significance of thymidylate synthase expression in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Chang, Myung Hee
    Ahn, Jin Seok
    Lee, Jeeyun
    Kim, Kyoung Ha
    Park, Yeon Hee
    Han, Joungho
    Ahn, Myung-Ju
    Park, Keunchil
    LUNG CANCER, 2010, 69 (03) : 323 - 329
  • [44] Targeted agents in the third-/fourth-line treatment of patients with advanced (stage III/IV) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
    Langer, Corey J.
    Mok, Tony
    Postmus, Pieter E.
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2013, 39 (03) : 252 - 260
  • [45] Evaluation of Irinotecan and Trifluridine/Tipiracil as Fourth-line Treatments After Third-line Nivolumab for Advanced Gastric Cancer
    Hayashi, Kei
    Furuta, Mitsuhiro
    Furusawa, Kyoko
    Hamaguchi, Tomomi
    Watanabe, Mamoru
    Inokuchi, Yasuhiro
    Onuma, Shizune
    Hashimoto, Itaru
    Suematsu, Hideaki
    Nagasawa, Shinsuke
    Kanematsu, Kyohei
    Yamada, Takanobu
    Notsu, Akifumi
    Ogata, Takashi
    Oshima, Takashi
    Machida, Nozomu
    Furuse, Junji
    Maeda, Shin
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 43 (06) : 2831 - 2840
  • [46] Docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer
    Roila, F
    Del Favero, A
    Ballatori, E
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (21) : 3738 - 3738
  • [47] Second-line chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Fossella F.V.
    Current Oncology Reports, 2000, 2 (1) : 96 - 101
  • [48] Second-line and third-line chemotherapy for lung cancer: Use and cost
    Ramsey, Scott D.
    Martins, Renato G.
    Blough, David K.
    Tock, Lauri S.
    Lubeck, Deborah
    Reyes, Carolina M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2008, 14 (05): : 297 - 306
  • [49] Third-line therapy and beyond for patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    Corral Jaime, Jesus
    Gonzalez de la Pena, Miriam
    Alonso, Miriam
    Sanchez Gastaldo, Amparo
    Dolores Mediano, Maria
    Amerigo, Marta
    Enrique Robles, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [50] Oral second-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: The bottom line
    Gandara, David R.
    Davies, Angela M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (18) : 2700 - 2701