Interference- and chatter-free cutter posture optimization towards minimal surface roughness in five-axis machining

被引:32
|
作者
Zhao, Zengya [1 ]
Wang, Sibao [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zehua [1 ]
Liu, Ning [3 ]
Wang, Shilong [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Chi [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Bo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Coll Mech Engn, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Key State Lab Mech Transmiss, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Mech Engn, 9 Engn Dr 1, Singapore 117576, Singapore
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Five-axis machining; Cutter posture optimization; Posture accessibility and stability diagram (PASD); Surface roughness; Cutter deformation force (CDF); TOOL ORIENTATIONS; RESIDUAL-STRESS; CUTTING FORCE; PREDICTION; AVOIDANCE; MODEL; INTEGRATION; GENERATION; STEEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105395
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Five-axis CNC machining of sculptured surfaces plays a significant role in aerospace industry, such as blisk machining. The key issue involved is the determination of cutter posture in tool path planning. As the interference will cause the cutter to intrude the workpiece or machine tool and then seriously damage the cutter or machine tool, cutter posture must be well planned to avoid interference. Meanwhile, as the machined surface quality will be deteriorated inevitably when chatter arises, chatter must be eliminated as well. In this paper, posture accessibility and stability diagram (PASD) is firstly constructed by identifying interference- and chatter-free cutter postures based on geometric analysis and machining dynamic analysis. Furthermore, as surface roughness is an important characteristic to evaluate the surface properties of workpieces and should be generally minimized, its prediction model is also established for optimization. As is well known, surface roughness is mainly affected by cutter deflection due to inevitable cutter deformation force (CDF). By analyzing the relationship between surface roughness and maximum CDF, a novel surface roughness prediction model is proposed from a new viewpoint, i.e., the maximum CDF. Compared with the traditional prediction models considering only geometry, the proposed prediction model is much more straightforward, and the prediction results are more accurate (the average prediction error is only about 9.0%). This study reveals that the cutter posture has a great effect on surface roughness, which implies that surface roughness can be optimized from a new perspective (cutter posture). Finally, based on the proposed PASD and surface roughness prediction model, a new cutter posture optimization algorithm is proposed to minimize surface roughness. The algorithm considers both geometrical and dynamical constraints (interference and chatter) simultaneously, and it is verified by machining experiments under different cutter postures. According to the validation experiments, the proposed algorithm can effectively avoid the interference and chatter while minimizing the surface roughness (the optimized Ra is only 0.3589 mu m compared to normal one 0.5476 mu m). To the authors' best knowledge, it is the first time to optimize cutter posture by considering the following three aspects simultaneously: avoiding interference, eliminating chatter and reducing surface roughness. It will greatly improve the machined surface properties, while optimizing the utilization of the machine tool and cutter (extending their service life by avoiding various potential damages). This also will provide a new perspective that optimizes the machining process of complex and precise parts from cutter posture, which is of great significance to aviation and aerospace industries.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Interference-free tool path generation in five-axis machining of a marine propeller
    Youn, JW
    Jun, Y
    Park, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2003, 41 (18) : 4383 - 4402
  • [42] Interference-free tool path generation in five-axis machining of a marine propeller
    Youn, J.-W. (jwyoun@daegu.ac.kr), 1600, Taylor and Francis Ltd. (41):
  • [43] Interference-free tool orientation determination by a virtual enveloping element for five-axis machining of a freeform surface
    Lee, RS
    Lee, JN
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART B-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANUFACTURE, 2001, 215 (12) : 1683 - 1693
  • [44] Chatter-free tool orientations during five-axis ball-end milling of curved thin-walled parts
    Wang, Dazhen
    Tian, Weijun
    Zhou, Jinhua
    Ren, Junxue
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 133 (11-12): : 5691 - 5703
  • [45] Grind-free tool path generation for five-axis surface machining
    Pi, JX
    Red, E
    Jensen, G
    COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 1998, 11 (04): : 337 - 350
  • [46] Surface roughness generated by ball-end mill on five-axis controlled machining centers
    Zhao, Xiaoming
    Koreta, Noriyuki
    Tsutsumi, Masaomi
    Seimitsu Kogaku Kaishi/Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, 1998, 64 (12): : 1826 - 1830
  • [47] Collision-free regions of tool posture in five-axis machining of blisk with a filleted end mill
    Wang, Zhiwei
    Shi, Yaoyao
    Lin, Xiaojun
    Gao, Yuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 104 (1-4): : 645 - 659
  • [48] Collision-free regions of tool posture in five-axis machining of blisk with a filleted end mill
    Zhiwei Wang
    Yaoyao Shi
    Xiaojun Lin
    Yuan Gao
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2019, 104 : 645 - 659
  • [49] Axis path planning of five-axis surface machining by optimizing differential vector of the axis movement considering tool posture limits
    Li, Jiajing
    Lu, Lei
    Wang, Sicong
    Dai, Sijie
    Sun, Lining
    Wang, Zhenyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 132 (9-10): : 4841 - 4855
  • [50] Tool orientation optimization for the five-axis CNC machining to constrain the contour errors without interference
    Xiao, Qun-Bao
    Wan, Min
    Zhang, Wei-Hong
    Yang, Yun
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2022, 76 : 46 - 56