Endoscopic balloon dilation for treatment of sleeve gastrectomy stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:25
|
作者
Chang, Steven H. [1 ]
Popov, Violeta B. [1 ]
Thompson, Christopher C. [2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Div Gastroenterol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
BARIATRIC SURGERY; GASTRIC STENOSIS; MORBID-OBESITY; SYMPTOMATIC STENOSIS; MANAGEMENT OPTIONS; COMPLICATIONS; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.034
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: Gastric stenosis is a rare but potentially serious adverse event after sleeve gastrectomy. Despite current suboptimal treatments, endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) has emerged as a safe and efficacious approach. The purpose of this study is to assess the overall success of EBD for sleeve gastrectomy stenosis (SGS) as first-line therapy. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database were searched from inception to July 2018. The primary outcome was defined as overall success rate of clinical resolution of SGS obstructive symptoms with EBD, expressed as pooled event rate and 95% confidence interval (CI). The secondary predefined outcomes include EBD success rates for SGS in the proximal (cardia) location or mid-distal location (antrum/incisura), in early SGS (up to 3 months after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy), and late SGS (3 months or longer after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy) and success rate of cases requiring stents or salvage surgery. Results: Eighteen studies encompassing 426 patients were analyzed. The average age and body mass index were 41.7 years and 40.1 kg/m(2), respectively, and the average number of dilations for all cases was 1.8 per person. Overall EBD success rate was 76% (95% CI, .67-.86). EBD success rate in the proximal SGS was 90% (95% CI, 63%-98%), distal SGS was 70% (95% CI, 47%-86%), early SGS within 3 months was 59% (95% CI, 34%-79%), and late SGS after 3 months was 61% (95% CI, 41%-78%). Seventeen percent of patients underwent secondary salvage surgery, with a success rate of 91% (95% CI, 80%-96%). Conclusions: Endoscopic balloon dilation appears to be a safe and effective minimally invasive alternative to surgical revision and should be used as first-line therapy for SGS
引用
收藏
页码:989 / +
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ENDOSCOPIC INCISION THERAPY VERSUS ENDOSCOPIC BALLOON DILATION FOR BENIGN ESOPHAGEAL STRICTURES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Asghar, Muhammad
    Boulay, Brian
    Puli, Srinivas
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 99 (06) : AB1060 - AB1060
  • [22] GERD as a Complication of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for the Treatment of Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Znamirowski, Przemyslaw
    Kolomanska, Magdalena
    Mazurkiewicz, Robert
    Tymchyshyn, Oksana
    Nawacki, Lukasz
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (08):
  • [23] A protocolized approach to endoscopic hydrostatic versus pneumatic balloon dilation therapy for gastric sleeve stenosis: a multicenter study and meta-analysis
    Jaruvongvanich, Veeravich
    Matar, Reem
    Beran, Azizullah
    Maselli, Daniel B.
    Storm, Andrew C.
    Gomez, Victoria
    Vargas, Eric J.
    Kellogg, Todd A.
    McKenzie, Travis J.
    Pannala, Rahul
    Neto, Manoel Galvao
    Texeira, Andre
    Abu Dayyeh, Barham K.
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2020, 16 (10) : 1543 - 1553
  • [24] Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Non-banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chaouch, Mohamed Ali
    Daghmouri, Mohamed Aziz
    Oweira, Hani
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 (01) : 370 - 371
  • [25] Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Non-banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Mehul Gupta
    Vitish Singla
    Arun Kumar
    Ritvik Chekuri
    Yellamraju Sai Kaustubh
    Sandeep Aggarwal
    Obesity Surgery, 2022, 32 : 2744 - 2752
  • [26] Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Non-banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Gupta, Mehul
    Singla, Vitish
    Kumar, Arun
    Chekuri, Ritvik
    Kaustubh, Yellamraju Sai
    Aggarwal, Sandeep
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (08) : 2744 - 2752
  • [27] EFFECTIVENESS OF SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY PLUS FUNDOPLICATION VERSUS SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY ALONE FOR TREATMENT OF SEVERE OBESITY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Loo, Jing Hong
    Yeung, Baldwin Po Man
    Lim, Chin Hong
    Toh, Bin Chet
    Kariyawasam, Gamage Manisha Daminda
    Ong, Lester Wei Lin
    Tan, Jeremy Tian Hui
    Wong, Wai Keong
    Chue, Koy Min
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 : 105 - 105
  • [28] Resleeve for failed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aiolfi, Alberto
    Micheletto, Giancarlo
    Marin, Jacopo
    Bonitta, Gianluca
    Lesti, Giovanni
    Bona, Davide
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2020, 16 (10) : 1383 - 1391
  • [29] Reduced Port Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Gutierrez-Ramirez, Lucia
    Morandeira-Rivas, Antonio
    Medina-Benitez, Elisa
    Arias-Arias, Angel
    Moreno-Sanz, Carlos
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2024, 34 (12) : 4519 - 4530
  • [30] Laparoscopic versus Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Aloulou, Mohammad
    Amr, Bassem
    Kassem, Luma Haj
    Arnaout, Ahmad Yamen
    Hawa, Nouran
    Hawa, Hanadi
    Aloulou, Marwa
    Abd-ElGawad, Mohammed
    Hamza, Nouran
    Ghazal, Ahmad
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (SUPPL 1) : 11 - 11