Opalescence and fluorescence properties of indirect and direct resin materials

被引:14
|
作者
Song, Sang-Hoon
Yu, Bin
Ahn, Jin-Soo
Lee, Yong-Keun [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Dent Biomat Sci, Dent Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
opalescence; fluorescence; indirect resin material; direct resin material;
D O I
10.1080/00016350802208414
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. To measure the opalescence and fluorescence properties of indirect and direct resin materials before and after polymerization, and to determine the influence of the material and shade group combination on these properties. Material and methods. BelleGlass NG (BG, indirect resin) and Estelite Sigma (ES, direct resin), each composed in 3 shade groups (EN, OD and TL for BG; BS, AS and OP for ES) out of a total of 16 shades were investigated. Resin material was packed into a mold (the BEC condition) and polymerized with a light-polymerization unit (CWL). Secondary polymerization (CIC) was performed for BG. Color was measured in the BEC, CWL, and CIC conditions, and the opalescence parameter (OP) and fluorescence parameter (FL) were calculated. Results. For the OP, the mean for BG material was 24.3 before polymerization, which changed to 19.9 after polymerization (CIC). In the case of ES, the mean OP before polymerization was 25.6, which changed to 12.4 after polymerization (CWL). For the FL, the mean FL for BG was 2.5 before polymerization, which changed to 0.7 after polymerization. In the case of ES, the mean FL before polymerization was 1.2, which did not change after polymerization. Material and shade group combination influenced the OP and FL values (p < 0.05). Conclusions. The opalescence and fluorescence properties of resin materials varied depending on the material, shade group, and polymerization. Clinically, these properties should be considered when neighboring teeth are restored with different types of material.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 242
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE IN DIRECT AND INDIRECT COMPOSITE RESIN RESTORATIONS INVITRO
    ROBINSON, PB
    MOORE, BK
    SWARTZ, ML
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1987, 66 (04) : 874 - 874
  • [22] Direct and indirect adhesive restorative materials: A review
    Kugel, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2000, 13 : 35D - 40D
  • [23] Microtensile bond strength of two resin composite materials placed with direct and indirect techniques under simulated pulpal pressure
    Sengun, A
    Ünlü, N
    Ozturk, B
    Özer, F
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2005, 7 (03): : 197 - 202
  • [24] Thermal Properties of Direct and Indirect Moxibustion
    Yi, Seung-Ho
    JOURNAL OF ACUPUNCTURE AND MERIDIAN STUDIES, 2009, 2 (04) : 273 - 279
  • [25] Difference in opalescence of restorative materials by the illuminant
    Yu, Bin
    Lee, Yong-Keun
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2009, 25 (08) : 1014 - 1021
  • [26] Influence of colorant solutions in properties of indirect resin composites
    dos Santos, Daniela Micheline
    de Paula, Adrielle Mendes
    Bonatto, Liliane da Rocha
    Ereitas da Silva, Emily Vivianne
    Vechiato Filho, Aljomar Jose
    Moreno, Amalia
    Goiato, Marcelo Coelho
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2015, 28 (04): : 219 - 223
  • [27] Material properties and fractography of an indirect dental resin composite
    Quinn, Janet B.
    Quinn, George D.
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2010, 26 (06) : 589 - 599
  • [29] Comparison of eluted monomer from different indirect and direct resin composites
    Cebe, Fatma
    Cebe, Mehmet Ata
    Polat, Serdar
    Bicakci, Hasan
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 31 (15) : 1711 - 1722
  • [30] Microleakage in the proximal walls of direct and indirect posterior resin slot restorations
    Fruits, T. J.
    Knapp, J. A.
    Khajotia, S. S.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2006, 31 (06) : 719 - 727