Comparative efficacy and acceptability of methylphenidate and atomoxetine in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis

被引:90
|
作者
Hanwella, Raveen [1 ]
Senanayake, Madhri [1 ]
de Silva, Varuni [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colombo, Dept Psychol Med, Fac Med, Colombo, Sri Lanka
关键词
ONCE-A-DAY; DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; OPEN-LABEL; MULTICENTER; ADHD;
D O I
10.1186/1471-244X-11-176
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Psychostimulants and non stimulants are effective in the treatment of ADHD. Efficacy of both methylphenidate and atomoxetine has been established in placebo controlled trials. Direct comparison of efficacy is now possible due to availability of results from several head-to-head trials of these two medications. Methods: All published, randomized, open label or double blind trials, comparing efficacy of methylphenidate with atomoxetine, in treatment of ADHD in children, diagnosed using DSM-IV (TM) criteria were included. The outcome studied was ADHDRS-IVParent:Inv score. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used as a measure of effect size. Results: Nine randomized trials comparing methylphenidate and atomoxetine, with a total of 2762 participants were included. Meta-analysis did not find a significant difference in efficacy between methylphenidate and atomoxetine (SMD = 0.09, 95% CI -0.08-0.26) (Z = 1.06, p = 0.29). Synthesis of data from eight trials found no significant difference in response rates (RR = 0.93 95% CI 0.76-1.14, p = 0.49). Sub group analysis showed a significant standardized mean difference favouring OROS methylphenidate (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI 0.12-0.53 (Z = 3.05, p < 0.002). Immediate release methylphenidate was not superior to atomoxetine (SMD = -0.04, 95% CI -0.19-0.12) (Z = 0.46, p = 0.64). Excluding open label trials did not significantly alter the effect size (SMD = 0.08, 95% CI -0.04-0.21) (Z = 1.27, p = 0.20). All-cause discontinuation was used as a measure of acceptability. There was no significant difference in all cause discontinuation between atomoxetine and methylphenidate (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.87-1.71). There was significant heterogeneity among the studies (p = 0.002, I-2 = 67%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated the heterogeneity to be due to the open label trials (p = 0.001, I-2 = 81%). Conclusions: In general atomoxetine and methylphenidate have comparable efficacy and equal acceptability in treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents. However OROS methylphenidate is more effective than atomoxetine and may be considered as first line treatment in treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Efficacy of Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine on Social Adjustment in Youths with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
    Shang, Chi-Yung
    Shih, Hsien-Hsueh
    Pan, Yi-Lei
    Lin, Hsiang-Yuan
    Gau, Susan Shur-Fen
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 30 (03) : 148 - 158
  • [22] Atomoxetine pharmacokinetics in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
    Witcher, JW
    Long, A
    Smith, B
    Sauer, JM
    Heilgenstein, J
    Wilens, T
    Spencer, T
    Biederman, J
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 13 (01) : 53 - 63
  • [23] EVIDENCE OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF METHYLPHENIDATE IN THE TREATMENT OF CHILDREN OR ADOLESCENTS WITH ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER AND HYPERACTIVITY (ADHD)
    Leite, B. F.
    Vidal, J. S.
    Silva, A. S.
    Brito, G., V
    Souza, K. M.
    Freitas, M. G.
    Vieira, N. C.
    Wichmann, R.
    Silveira, D. S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A837 - A837
  • [24] Atomoxetine:: a new treatment for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents
    Purper-Ouakil, D
    Fourneret, P
    Wohl, M
    Rénéric, JP
    ENCEPHALE-REVUE DE PSYCHIATRIE CLINIQUE BIOLOGIQUE ET THERAPEUTIQUE, 2005, 31 (03): : 337 - 348
  • [26] Efficacy and safety of atomoxetine for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents-meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis
    Cheng, Jackie Y. W.
    Chen, Ronald Y. L.
    Ko, John S. N.
    Ng, Emil M. L.
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 194 (02) : 197 - 209
  • [27] Atomoxetine for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a review
    Hammerness, Paul
    McCarthy, Katherine
    Mancuso, Elizabeth
    Gendron, Cassandra
    Geller, Daniel
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2009, 5 : 215 - 226
  • [28] Meta-analysis of the efficacy of methylphenidate for treating adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Faraone, SV
    Spencer, T
    Aleardi, M
    Pagano, C
    Biederman, J
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 24 (01) : 24 - 29
  • [29] Efficacy and safety of drugs for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis
    Sarah C. O. S. Padilha
    Suzane Virtuoso
    Fernanda S. Tonin
    Helena H. L. Borba
    Roberto Pontarolo
    European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2018, 27 : 1335 - 1345
  • [30] Efficacy and safety of drugs for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis
    Padilha, Sarah C. O. S.
    Virtuoso, Suzane
    Tonin, Fernanda S.
    Borba, Helena H. L.
    Pontarolo, Roberto
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 27 (10) : 1335 - 1345