Comparative efficacy and acceptability of methylphenidate and atomoxetine in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis

被引:90
|
作者
Hanwella, Raveen [1 ]
Senanayake, Madhri [1 ]
de Silva, Varuni [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colombo, Dept Psychol Med, Fac Med, Colombo, Sri Lanka
关键词
ONCE-A-DAY; DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; OPEN-LABEL; MULTICENTER; ADHD;
D O I
10.1186/1471-244X-11-176
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Psychostimulants and non stimulants are effective in the treatment of ADHD. Efficacy of both methylphenidate and atomoxetine has been established in placebo controlled trials. Direct comparison of efficacy is now possible due to availability of results from several head-to-head trials of these two medications. Methods: All published, randomized, open label or double blind trials, comparing efficacy of methylphenidate with atomoxetine, in treatment of ADHD in children, diagnosed using DSM-IV (TM) criteria were included. The outcome studied was ADHDRS-IVParent:Inv score. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used as a measure of effect size. Results: Nine randomized trials comparing methylphenidate and atomoxetine, with a total of 2762 participants were included. Meta-analysis did not find a significant difference in efficacy between methylphenidate and atomoxetine (SMD = 0.09, 95% CI -0.08-0.26) (Z = 1.06, p = 0.29). Synthesis of data from eight trials found no significant difference in response rates (RR = 0.93 95% CI 0.76-1.14, p = 0.49). Sub group analysis showed a significant standardized mean difference favouring OROS methylphenidate (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI 0.12-0.53 (Z = 3.05, p < 0.002). Immediate release methylphenidate was not superior to atomoxetine (SMD = -0.04, 95% CI -0.19-0.12) (Z = 0.46, p = 0.64). Excluding open label trials did not significantly alter the effect size (SMD = 0.08, 95% CI -0.04-0.21) (Z = 1.27, p = 0.20). All-cause discontinuation was used as a measure of acceptability. There was no significant difference in all cause discontinuation between atomoxetine and methylphenidate (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.87-1.71). There was significant heterogeneity among the studies (p = 0.002, I-2 = 67%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated the heterogeneity to be due to the open label trials (p = 0.001, I-2 = 81%). Conclusions: In general atomoxetine and methylphenidate have comparable efficacy and equal acceptability in treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents. However OROS methylphenidate is more effective than atomoxetine and may be considered as first line treatment in treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative efficacy and acceptability of methylphenidate and atomoxetine in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis
    Raveen Hanwella
    Madhri Senanayake
    Varuni de Silva
    BMC Psychiatry, 11
  • [2] Comparative efficacy and acceptability of atomoxetine, lisdexamfetamine, bupropion and methylphenidate in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis with focus on bupropion
    Stuhec, Matej
    Munda, Barbara
    Svab, Vesna
    Locatelli, Igor
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2015, 178 : 149 - 159
  • [3] A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS OF ATOMOXETINE, METHYLPHENIDATE, LISDEXAMFETAMINE, AND BUPROPION FOR THE TREATMENT OF ATTENTION DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS
    Locatelli, I
    Venisnik, K.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A521 - A522
  • [4] Efficacy of atomoxetine treatment for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
    Dunn, D
    Allen, A
    Thomason, C
    Zhang, S
    Michelson, D
    Kelsey, D
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2003, 54 : S143 - S143
  • [5] Comparative efficacy and safety of methylphenidate and atomoxetine for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: Meta-analysis based on head-to-head trials
    Liu, Qiang
    Zhang, Hong
    Fang, Qingqing
    Qin, Lili
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 39 (09) : 854 - 865
  • [6] Comparative Efficacy of Atomoxetine, Lisdexamfetamine, Bupropion and Methylphenidate in Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents: a Metaanalysis with Focus On Bupropion
    Stuhec, M.
    Munda, B.
    Svab, V.
    Locatelli, I.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 30
  • [7] Efficacy of atomoxetine in children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Yamamuro, K.
    Ueda, J.
    Takada, R.
    Yoshikawa, H.
    Aoki, C.
    Inoue, Y.
    Azechi, T.
    Yamamoto, S.
    Furuyama, T.
    Kishimoto, T.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 26 : S713 - S714
  • [8] Efficacy and safety of atomoxetine in the treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents
    Brown, WJ
    Biederman, J
    Spencer, T
    Heiligenstein, J
    Wernicke, J
    Allen, AJ
    Faries, D
    Michelson, D
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 12 : S411 - S411
  • [9] Efficacy and Safety of Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
    Kohn, Michael R.
    Tsang, Tracey W.
    Clarke, Simon D.
    CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-PEDIATRICS, 2012, 6 : 95 - 162
  • [10] Comparative efficacy of Adderall and methylphenidate in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analysis
    Faraone, SV
    Biederman, J
    Roe, C
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 22 (05) : 468 - 473