Models for measuring and benchmarking olympics achievements

被引:49
|
作者
Li, Yongjun [1 ]
Liang, Liang [1 ]
Chen, Yao [2 ]
Morita, Hiroshi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Anhua 230026, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Coll Management, Lowell, MA 01845 USA
[3] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Informat Sci & Technol, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
来源
关键词
data envelopment analysis; Olympic; performance; assurance region;
D O I
10.1016/j.omega.2007.05.003
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
As demonstrated in several recent studies, data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a useful tool for evaluating and comparing the performance of nations competing in the Olympic Games. Assurance regions (ARs) have been used to further refine the DEA results. These AR DEA models assume that ARs apply uniformly across all nations. Such models can have shortcomings in the sense that different nations may impose different ARs, as nations may value gold, silver, and bronze medals differently. This paper extends previous DEA studies by incorporating multiple sets of nation-specific ARs into the DEA. By doing so, we establish fair models for measuring and benchmarking the performance of nations at six summer Olympic Games. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:933 / 940
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Towards benchmarking models of brightness perception
    Matic, Matko
    Schmittwilken, Lynn
    Maertens, Marianne
    Vincent, Joris
    PERCEPTION, 2021, 50 (1_SUPPL) : 80 - 80
  • [42] Benchmarking Rigid Body Contact Models
    Guo, Michelle
    Jiang, Yifeng
    Spielberg, Andrew Everett
    Wu, Jiajun
    Liu, Karen
    LEARNING FOR DYNAMICS AND CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOL 211, 2023, 211
  • [44] Benchmarking ionizing space environment models
    Bourdarie, S.
    Inguimbert, C.
    Vaille, J. -R.
    Calvel, P.
    Sicard-Piet, A.
    Falguere, D.
    Lorfevre, E.
    Ecoffet, R.
    Poivey, C.
    2016 16TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RADIATION AND ITS EFFECTS ON COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS (RADECS), 2016,
  • [45] Benchmarking and Process Diagnostics of Land Models
    Nearing, Grey S.
    Ruddell, Benjamin L.
    Clark, Martyn P.
    Nijssen, Bart
    Peters-Lidard, Christa
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2018, 19 (11) : 1835 - 1852
  • [46] Benchmarking software reliability growth models
    Hu, YW
    Zhang, W
    Li, B
    PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 1- 6, 2004, : 908 - 913
  • [47] Benchmarking medical large language models
    Bakhshandeh, Sadra
    NATURE REVIEWS BIOENGINEERING, 2023, 1 (08): : 543 - 543
  • [48] Benchmarking the Robustness of Instance Segmentation Models
    Dalva, Yusuf
    Pehlivan, Hamza
    Altindis, Said Fahri
    Dundar, Aysegul
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS, 2024, 35 (12) : 17021 - 17035
  • [49] A framework for benchmarking competency assessment models
    Kasser, Joseph
    Hitchins, Derek
    Frank, Moti
    Zhao, Yang Yang
    SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2013, 16 (01) : 29 - 44
  • [50] RobustMQ: benchmarking robustness of quantized models
    Yisong Xiao
    Aishan Liu
    Tianyuan Zhang
    Haotong Qin
    Jinyang Guo
    Xianglong Liu
    Visual Intelligence, 1 (1):