Cefazolin versus cloxacillin as definitive antibiotic therapy for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus spinal epidural abscess: a retrospective cohort study

被引:6
|
作者
Bai, Anthony D. [1 ]
Findlater, Aidan [2 ]
Irfan, Neal [3 ]
Singhal, Nishma [2 ]
Loeb, Mark [2 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hlth Res Methodol Program, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Div Infect Dis, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Cefazolin; Antistaphylococcal penicillin; Staphylococcus aureus; Methicillin-susceptible; MSSA; Spinal epidural abscess; PROPORTIONS; INFECTIONS; OXACILLIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106429
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: We compared the effectiveness of cefazolin and cloxacillin as definitive antibiotic therapy for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) spinal epidural abscess (SEA). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with MSSA SEA from two academic hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, between 2014 and 2020. Patients treated with cefazolin were compared to those treated with cloxacillin. Co-primary outcomes included 90-day mortality, antibiotic failure, adverse reactions and recurrence. Inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores was used to balance important prognostic factors and to estimate an adjusted risk difference. Results: Of 98 patients with MSSA SEA, 50 and 48 patients were treated with cefazolin and cloxacillin, respectively. Mortality at 90 days was 8% and 13% in the cefazolin and cloxacillin groups, respectively ( P = 0.52). The antibiotic failure rate was 12% and 19% in the cefazolin and cloxacillin groups, respectively ( P = 0.41). The serious adverse reactions rate was 0% and 4% in the cefazolin and cloxacillin groups, respectively ( P = 0.24). The recurrence rate was 2% and 8% in the cefazolin and cloxacillin groups, respectively ( P = 0.20). The adjusted risk difference for mortality at 90 days was -1% [95% confidence interval (CI) -10% to 8%] favouring cefazolin. The adjusted risk differences for antibiotic failure, adverse reactions and recurrence were 1% (95% CI -12% to 14%), -5% (95% CI -11% to 2%) and -18% (-36% to -1%) respectively. Conclusion: Cefazolin is likely as effective as an antistaphylococcal penicillin and may be considered as a first-line treatment for MSSA SEA. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd and International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: a comparison of cefazolin and ceftriaxone
    S. A. Winans
    A. M. Luce
    R. Hasbun
    Infection, 2013, 41 : 769 - 774
  • [32] Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: a comparison of cefazolin and ceftriaxone
    Winans, S. A.
    Luce, A. M.
    Hasbun, R.
    INFECTION, 2013, 41 (04) : 769 - 774
  • [33] Cefazolin and Ertapenem Salvage Therapy Rapidly Clears Persistent Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
    Ulloa, Erlinda R.
    Singh, Kavindra, V
    Geriak, Matthew
    Haddad, Fadi
    Murray, Barbara E.
    Nizet, Victor
    Sakoulas, George
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 71 (06) : 1413 - 1418
  • [34] Comparative Effectiveness of Cefazolin Versus Nafcillin or Oxacillin for Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Infections Complicated by Bacteremia: A Nationwide Cohort Study
    McDanel, Jennifer S.
    Roghmann, Mary-Claire
    Perencevich, Eli N.
    Ohl, Michael E.
    Goto, Michihiko
    Livorsi, Daniel J.
    Jones, Makoto
    Albertson, Justin P.
    Nair, Rajeshwari
    O'Shea, Amy M. J.
    Schweizer, Marin L.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 65 (01) : 100 - 106
  • [35] Comparison of mortality, stroke, and relapse for methicillin-resistant versus methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis: a retrospective cohort study
    Kanyo, Emese C.
    Nowacki, Amy S.
    Gordon, Steven M.
    Shrestha, Nabin K.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 100 (04)
  • [36] Cefazolin Inoculum Effect and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Osteoarticular Infections in Children
    McNeil, J. Chase
    Sommer, Lauren M.
    Boyle, Mary
    Hogan, Patrick
    Vallejo, Jesus G.
    Hulten, Kristina G.
    Flores, Anthony R.
    Kaplan, Sheldon L.
    Fritz, Stephanie
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2020, 64 (09)
  • [37] A Test for the Rapid Detection of the cefazolin Inoculum Effect in Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus
    Rincon, Sandra
    Carvajal, Lina P.
    Gomez-Villegas, Sara, I
    Echeverri, Aura M.
    Rios, Rafael
    An Dinh
    Pedroza, Claudia
    Ordonez, Karen M.
    Nannini, Esteban
    Sun, Zhizeng
    Fowler, Vance G.
    Murray, Barbara E.
    Miller, William R.
    Palzkill, Timothy
    Diaz, Lorena
    Arias, Cesar A.
    Reyes, Jinnethe
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 59 (04)
  • [38] Cefazolin as second line treatment for invasive Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infection in a UK cohort of patients
    Young, Bernadette C.
    Dunsmure, Louise
    Downs, Louise
    Kildonaviciute, Kornelija
    Jones, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2021, 82 (05) : E25 - E27
  • [39] The Safety and Economic Impact of Cefazolin versus Nafcillin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections
    Flynt, Lauren K.
    Kenney, Rachel M.
    Zervos, Marcus J.
    Davis, Susan L.
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND THERAPY, 2017, 6 (02) : 225 - 231
  • [40] A Case of Pyogenic Liver Abscess Caused by Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus
    Igbinedion, Samuel O.
    Mavuram, Meher S.
    Boktor, Moheb
    Bienvenu, John
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 112 : S1572 - S1572