Cefazolin versus cloxacillin as definitive antibiotic therapy for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus spinal epidural abscess: a retrospective cohort study

被引:6
|
作者
Bai, Anthony D. [1 ]
Findlater, Aidan [2 ]
Irfan, Neal [3 ]
Singhal, Nishma [2 ]
Loeb, Mark [2 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hlth Res Methodol Program, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Div Infect Dis, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Cefazolin; Antistaphylococcal penicillin; Staphylococcus aureus; Methicillin-susceptible; MSSA; Spinal epidural abscess; PROPORTIONS; INFECTIONS; OXACILLIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106429
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: We compared the effectiveness of cefazolin and cloxacillin as definitive antibiotic therapy for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) spinal epidural abscess (SEA). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with MSSA SEA from two academic hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, between 2014 and 2020. Patients treated with cefazolin were compared to those treated with cloxacillin. Co-primary outcomes included 90-day mortality, antibiotic failure, adverse reactions and recurrence. Inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores was used to balance important prognostic factors and to estimate an adjusted risk difference. Results: Of 98 patients with MSSA SEA, 50 and 48 patients were treated with cefazolin and cloxacillin, respectively. Mortality at 90 days was 8% and 13% in the cefazolin and cloxacillin groups, respectively ( P = 0.52). The antibiotic failure rate was 12% and 19% in the cefazolin and cloxacillin groups, respectively ( P = 0.41). The serious adverse reactions rate was 0% and 4% in the cefazolin and cloxacillin groups, respectively ( P = 0.24). The recurrence rate was 2% and 8% in the cefazolin and cloxacillin groups, respectively ( P = 0.20). The adjusted risk difference for mortality at 90 days was -1% [95% confidence interval (CI) -10% to 8%] favouring cefazolin. The adjusted risk differences for antibiotic failure, adverse reactions and recurrence were 1% (95% CI -12% to 14%), -5% (95% CI -11% to 2%) and -18% (-36% to -1%) respectively. Conclusion: Cefazolin is likely as effective as an antistaphylococcal penicillin and may be considered as a first-line treatment for MSSA SEA. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd and International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A large retrospective cohort study of cefazolin compared with flucloxacillin for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia
    Davis, J. S.
    Turnidge, J.
    Tong, S. Y. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2018, 52 (02) : 297 - 300
  • [2] Cefazolin versus cloxacillin in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: Too good to be true? Authors' reply
    Herrera-Hidalgo, Laura
    de Alarcon, Aristides
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 142
  • [3] Cefazolin therapy for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in Japan
    Shoji, Takayo
    Hirai, Yuji
    Osawa, Makiko
    Totsuka, Kyoichi
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2014, 20 (3-4) : 175 - 180
  • [4] Antistaphylococcal Penicillin vs Cefazolin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Spinal Epidural Abscesses
    Campioli, Cristina Corsini
    Go, John Raymond
    Abu Saleh, Omar
    Challener, Douglas
    Yetmar, Zachary
    Osmon, Douglas R.
    OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 8 (03):
  • [5] Nafcillin versus cefazolin for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
    Monogue, Marguerite L.
    Ortwine, Jessica K.
    Wei, Wenjing
    Eljaaly, Khalid
    Bhavan, Kavita P.
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 11 (05) : 727 - 731
  • [6] Ceftriaxone versus cefazolin for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia
    Mohamed, Adham
    Bennett, Nicholas
    Ploetz, Jeannette
    Aragon, Laura
    Kennedy, Kevin
    Boyd, Sarah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2022, 60 (03)
  • [7] Comparison of the efficacy of nafcillin and glycopeptides as definitive therapy for patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a retrospective cohort study
    Oh, Dong Hyun
    Kim, Jung Ju
    Kim, Jinnam
    Seong, Hye
    Lee, Se Ju
    Kim, Yong Chan
    Kim, Eun Jin
    Jung, In Young
    Jeong, Woo Yong
    Jeong, Su Jin
    Ku, Nam Su
    Han, Sang Hoon
    Choi, Jun Yong
    Song, Young Goo
    Kim, June Myung
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 18
  • [8] Comparison of the efficacy of nafcillin and glycopeptides as definitive therapy for patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a retrospective cohort study
    Dong Hyun Oh
    Jung Ju Kim
    Jinnam Kim
    Hye Seong
    Se Ju Lee
    Yong Chan Kim
    Eun Jin Kim
    In Young Jung
    Woo Yong Jeong
    Su Jin Jeong
    Nam Su Ku
    Sang Hoon Han
    Jun Yong Choi
    Young Goo Song
    June Myung Kim
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 18
  • [9] Post-treatment outcomes of ceftriaxone versus antistaphylococcal penicillins or cefazolin for definitive therapy of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
    Yetmar, Zachary A.
    Khodadadi, Ryan B.
    Go, John Raymond
    Chesdachai, Supavit
    Abu Saleh, Omar M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2023, 42 (04) : 423 - 430
  • [10] Post-treatment outcomes of ceftriaxone versus antistaphylococcal penicillins or cefazolin for definitive therapy of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
    Zachary A. Yetmar
    Ryan B. Khodadadi
    John Raymond Go
    Supavit Chesdachai
    Omar M. Abu Saleh
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2023, 42 : 423 - 430