Is a reduction in radiation lung volume and dose necessary with paclitaxel chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer?

被引:17
|
作者
Taghian, AG [1 ]
Assaad, SI [1 ]
Niemierko, A [1 ]
Floyd, SR [1 ]
Powell, SN [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
node-positive breast cancer; paclitaxel; combination chemotherapy; radiotherapy; radiation pneumonitis; lung tolerance;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.044
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate and quantify the effect of irradiated lung volume, radiation dose, and paclitaxel chemotherapy on the development of radiation pneumonitis (RP) in breast cancer patients with positive lymph nodes. Methods and Materials: We previously reported the incidence of RP among 41 patients with breast cancer treated with radiotherapy (RT) and adjuvant paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy. We recorded the central lung distance, a measure of the extent of lung included in the RT volume, in these patients. We used this measure and the historical and observed rates of RP in our series to model the lung tolerance to RT in patients receiving chemotherapy (CHT) both with and without paclitaxel. To evaluate the risk factors for the development of RP, we performed a case-control study comparing paclitaxel-treated patients who developed RP with those who did not, and a second case-control study comparing patients receiving paclitaxel in addition to standard CHT/RT (n = 41) and controls receiving standard CHT/RT alone (n = 192). Results: The actuarial rate of RP in the paclitaxel-treated group was 15.4% compared with 0.9% among breast cancer patients treated with RT and non-paclitaxel-containing CHT. Our mathematical model found that the effective lung tolerance for patients treated with paclitaxel was reduced by approximately 24%. No statistically significant difference was found with regard to the dose delivered to specific radiation fields, dose per fraction, central lung distance, or percentage of lung irradiated in the case-control study of paclitaxel-treated patients who developed RP compared with those who did not. In the comparison of 41 patients receiving RT and CHT with paclitaxel and 192 matched controls receiving RT and CHT without paclitaxel, the only significant differences identified were the more frequent use of a supraclavicular radiation field and a decrease in the RT lung dose among the paclitaxel-treated patients. This finding indicates that the major factor associated with development of RP was paclitaxel treatment. Conclusions- The use of paclitaxel chemotherapy and RT in the primary treatment of node-positive breast cancer is likely to increase the incidence of RP. In patients treated with paclitaxel, reducing the percentage of lung irradiated by 24% should reduce the risk of RP to 1%, according to our calculations of lung tolerance. Future clinical trials using combination CHT that includes paclitaxel and RT should carefully evaluate the incidence and severity of RP and should also accurately monitor the extent of lung included within the RT volume to develop safe guidelines for the delivery of what is becoming standard therapy for node-positive breast cancer. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 391
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Is Axillary Radiation not Inferior to Axillary Dissection for Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?
    Khan, Tahsin M.
    Rossi, Alexander J.
    Suman, Vera
    Haffty, Bruce
    Hernandez, Jonathan M.
    Boughey, Judy C.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (03) : 1526 - 1527
  • [42] Predictors of axillary node response in node-positive patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer
    Ladak, Farah
    Chua, Natalie
    Lesniak, David
    Ghosh, Sunita
    Wiebe, Ericka
    Yakimetz, Walter
    Rajaee, Nikoo
    Olson, David
    Peiris, Lashan
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 65 (01) : E89 - E96
  • [43] Sentinel Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Cytologically Proven Node-Positive Breast Cancer
    Yagata, Hiroshi
    Yamauchi, Hideko
    Tsugawa, Koichiro
    Hayashi, Naoki
    Yoshida, Atsushi
    Kajiura, Yuka
    In, Reika
    Matsuda, Naoko
    Nakamura, Seigo
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2013, 13 (06) : 471 - 477
  • [44] Is Axillary Radiation not Inferior to Axillary Dissection for Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?
    Tahsin M. Khan
    Alexander J. Rossi
    Vera Suman
    Bruce Haffty
    Jonathan M. Hernandez
    Judy C. Boughey
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2022, 29 : 1526 - 1527
  • [45] Treatment of sentinel node-positive breast cancer
    Chagpar, Anees B.
    McMasters, Kelly M.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2006, 6 (08) : 1233 - 1239
  • [46] Reduced-Dose Radiation Therapy and Concurrent Paclitaxel Chemotherapy in Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Long-Term Follow-up of a Single-Institution Prospective Study
    Pisano, Courtney E.
    Kharouta, Michael Z.
    Harris, Eleanor E.
    Shenk, Robert
    Martin, James
    Owusu, Cynthia
    Lyons, Janice A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (04): : 883 - 886
  • [47] Adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer
    Noronha, V
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (09): : 954 - 954
  • [48] Axillary surgery in node-positive breast cancer
    Maggi, Nadia
    Nussbaumer, Rahel
    Holzer, Liezl
    Weber, Walter P.
    BREAST, 2022, 62 : S50 - S53
  • [49] Axillary surgery in node-positive breast cancer
    Weber, W.
    BREAST, 2021, 56 : S7 - S7
  • [50] Adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer
    Martin, M
    Pienkowski, T
    Mackey, J
    Pawlicki, M
    Guastalla, JP
    Weaver, C
    Tomiak, E
    Al-Tweigeri, T
    Chap, L
    Juhos, E
    Guevin, R
    Howell, A
    Fornander, T
    Hainsworth, J
    Coleman, R
    Vinholes, J
    Modiano, M
    Pinter, T
    Tang, SC
    Colwell, B
    Prady, C
    Provencher, L
    Walde, D
    Rodriguez-Lescure, A
    Hugh, J
    Loret, C
    Rupin, M
    Blitz, S
    Jacobs, P
    Murawsky, M
    Riva, A
    Vogel, C
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (22): : 2302 - 2313