Multi-criteria decision making with PCA in EDM of A2 tool steel

被引:6
|
作者
Sahu, Shiba Narayan [1 ]
Nayak, Narayan Chandra [2 ]
机构
[1] Utkal Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Bhubaneswar 751004, Odisha, India
[2] Indira Gandhi Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Sarang 759146, Odisha, India
关键词
EDM; MRR; EWR; OC; PCA; Full factorial design; PROCESS PARAMETERS; SURFACE INTEGRITY; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.209
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this investigation, experiments have been conducted with the help of full factorial design methodology in the Electro Discharge Machine (EDM) for machining of A2 tool steel. A cylindrical copper (99.9% pure) rod of 20 mm diameter has been selected as the electrode or tool material for machining. Four significant process parameters of EDM process such as discharge current (Ip), spark on time (Ton), duty cycle (Tau) and discharge voltage (V) have been studied in this research investigation. The effects of these parameters have been considered on the responses of EDM process such as Material Removal Rate (MRR) and Electrode Wear Rate (EWR) both in qualitative and quantitative terms. For qualitative analysis, main effect plots have been drawn, while for quantitative analysis ANOVA has been carried out. The significance of process parameters at 95% confidence interval has been found out through F-distribution and t-distribution values. ANOVA results revealed Ip and Ton as to be the major contributing process parameters for the considered EDM responses. Ip was found to have an 87.90% contribution towards MRR whereas Ton was having a 50.91% contribution towards TWR. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) has been implemented to find out the best trade-off between the responses MRR and EWR. The best process parameter setting for multicriteria decision making among the answers such as MRR and EWR was found to be: Ip = 16A, Ton = 500 mu s, Tau = 80%, V = 40volts. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18641 / 18648
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Structure of multi-criteria decision-making
    Brugha, C
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (11) : 1156 - 1168
  • [22] SYSTEMATIC DECISION MAKING: A EXTENDED MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING MODEL
    Yu, Xiaohan
    Xu, Zeshui
    Hu, Junquan
    Liu, Shousheng
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2017, 23 (01) : 157 - 177
  • [23] Methodological foundations of multi-criteria decision making
    Ogryczak, W
    Vetschera, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 158 (02) : 267 - 270
  • [24] Semantic Multi-Criteria Decision Making SeMCDM
    Mahmoudi, Ghadi
    Mueller-Schloer, Christian
    MCDM: 2009 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING, 2009, : 149 - 156
  • [25] Mutually Dependent Multi-criteria Decision Making
    Dalalah, Doraid
    Al-Tahat, Mohammad
    Bataineh, Khaled
    FUZZY INFORMATION AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 4 (02) : 195 - 216
  • [26] SUBJECTIVE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    ESHRAGH, F
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1980, 13 (01): : 117 - 141
  • [27] Visual support for multi-criteria decision making
    Laine, T.
    Forns-Samso, F.
    Kukkonen, V.
    EWORK AND EBUSINESS IN ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2016, : 371 - 376
  • [28] FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING ALGORITHMS
    Peneva, Vania
    Popchev, Ivan
    COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE BULGARE DES SCIENCES, 2010, 63 (07): : 979 - 992
  • [29] Imprecise probabilistic multi-criteria decision making
    Ding, Xiaosong
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT INNOVATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 1036 - 1041
  • [30] Supportive software for the multi-criteria decision making
    Gurecky, J.
    Moldrik, P.
    Dvorsky, J.
    Sebesta, R.
    RELIABILITY, RISK AND SAFETY: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS VOLS 1-3, 2010, : 131 - 136