Quantifying the Impact of Unavailability in Cyber-Physical Environments

被引:0
|
作者
Ben Aissa, Anis [1 ]
Abercrombie, Robert K. [2 ]
Sheldon, Frederick T. [3 ]
Mili, Ali [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
[2] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[3] Univ Memphis, Dept Comp Sci, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
[4] New Jersey Inst Technol, Coll Comp Sci, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
关键词
Availability; Security measures; Dependability; Security requirements for control systems; Threats; Vulnerabilities and Risk; RISK-ASSESSMENT; SECURITY; SCADA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system discussed in this work manages a distributed control network for the Tunisian Electric & Gas Utility. The network is dispersed over a large geographic area that monitors and controls the flow of electricity/gas from both remote and centralized locations. The availability of the SCADA system in this context is critical to ensuring the uninterrupted delivery of energy, including safety, security, continuity of operations and revenue. Such SCADA systems are the backbone of national critical cyber-physical infrastructures. Herein, we propose adapting the Mean Failure Cost (MFC) metric for quantifying the cost of unavailability. This new metric combines the classic availability formulation with MFC. The resulting metric, so-called Econometric Availability (EA), offers a computational basis to evaluate a system in terms of the gain/loss ($/hour of operation) that affects each stakeholder due to unavailability.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 33
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cyber-physical Systems
    Vogel-Heuser, Birgit
    Kowalewski, Stefan
    AT-AUTOMATISIERUNGSTECHNIK, 2013, 61 (10) : 667 - 668
  • [42] Cyber-Physical Control
    Galambos, Peter
    Rudas, Imre J.
    Zhang, Lixian
    Su, Shun-Feng
    COMPLEXITY, 2018,
  • [43] A Cyber-Physical Future
    Rajkumar, Ragunathan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2012, 100 : 1309 - 1312
  • [44] Distributed computational model for shared processing on Cyber-Physical System environments
    Mora, Higinio
    Colom, Jose Francisco
    Gil, David
    Jimeno-Morenilla, Antonio
    COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 111 : 68 - 83
  • [45] Guest Editorial: Recent Advances in Cyber-Physical Security in Industrial Environments
    Lv, Z.
    Mazurczyk, W.
    Wendzel, S.
    Song, H.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 15 (12) : 6468 - 6471
  • [46] Modelling and verifying time-aware processes for cyber-physical environments
    Graja, Imen
    Kallel, Slim
    Guermouche, Nawal
    Cheikhrouhou, Saoussen
    Kacem, Ahmed Hadj
    IET SOFTWARE, 2019, 13 (01) : 36 - 48
  • [47] CyFuzz: A Differential Testing Framework for Cyber-Physical Systems Development Environments
    Chowdhury, Shafiul Azam
    Johnson, Taylor T.
    Csallner, Christoph
    CYBER PHYSICAL SYSTEMS: DESIGN, MODELING, AND EVALUATION (CYPHY 2016), 2017, 10107 : 46 - 60
  • [48] An Efficient Dynamic Integration Middleware for Cyber-Physical Systems in Mobile Environments
    Sang Oh Park
    Jong Hyuk Park
    Young-Sik Jeong
    Mobile Networks and Applications, 2013, 18 : 110 - 115
  • [49] Formal modeling of cyber-physical resource scheduling in IIoT cloud environments
    Jha, Shashi Bhushan
    Babiceanu, Radu F.
    Seker, Remzi
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2020, 31 (05) : 1149 - 1164
  • [50] Securing Big Data and IoT Networks in Smart Cyber-Physical Environments
    Das, Sajal K.
    Yamana, Hayato
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT (ICSDE'17), 2017, : 189 - 194