CRISPR nuclease off-target activity and mitigation strategies

被引:18
|
作者
Wienert, Beeke [1 ]
Cromer, M. Kyle [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Graphite Bio Inc, South San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Surg, San Francisco, CA 94118 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Bioengn & Therapeut Sci, San Francisco, CA 94118 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Eli & Edythe Broad Ctr Regenerat Med, San Francisco, CA 94118 USA
来源
关键词
Gene therapy; off-target activity; in vivo delivery; genome editing; CRISPR; Cas9; next-generating sequencing; IN-VIVO; DNA-REPAIR; STEM-CELLS; GENOME; RNA; CAS9; BASE; SEQ; SPECIFICITY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3389/fgeed.2022.1050507
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The discovery of CRISPR has allowed site-specific genomic modification to become a reality and this technology is now being applied in a number of human clinical trials. While this technology has demonstrated impressive efficacy in the clinic to date, there remains the potential for unintended on- and off-target effects of CRISPR nuclease activity. A variety of in silico-based prediction tools and empirically derived experimental methods have been developed to identify the most common unintended effect-small insertions and deletions at genomic sites with homology to the guide RNA. However, large-scale aberrations have recently been reported such as translocations, inversions, deletions, and even chromothripsis. These are more difficult to detect using current workflows indicating a major unmet need in the field. In this review we summarize potential sequencing-based solutions that may be able to detect these large-scale effects even at low frequencies of occurrence. In addition, many of the current clinical trials using CRISPR involve ex vivo isolation of a patient's own stem cells, modification, and re-transplantation. However, there is growing interest in direct, in vivo delivery of genome editing tools. While this strategy has the potential to address disease in cell types that are not amenable to ex vivo manipulation, in vivo editing has only one desired outcome-on-target editing in the cell type of interest. CRISPR activity in unintended cell types (both on- and off-target) is therefore a major safety as well as ethical concern in tissues that could enable germline transmission. In this review, we have summarized the strengths and weaknesses of current editing and delivery tools and potential improvements to off-target and off-tissue CRISPR activity detection. We have also outlined potential mitigation strategies that will ensure that the safety of CRISPR keeps pace with efficacy, a necessary requirement if this technology is to realize its full translational potential.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CRISPR system: Discovery, development and off-target detection
    Chen, Shengmiao
    Yao, Yufeng
    Zhang, Yanchun
    Fan, Gaofeng
    CELLULAR SIGNALLING, 2020, 70
  • [22] Recognition of CRISPR Off-Target Cleavage Sites with SeqGAN
    Li, Wen
    Wang, Xiao-Bo
    Xu, Yan
    CURRENT BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 17 (01) : 101 - 107
  • [23] Strategies to Increase On-Target and Reduce Off-Target Effects of the CRISPR/Cas9 System in Plants
    Hajiahmadi, Zahra
    Movahedi, Ali
    Wei, Hui
    Li, Dawei
    Orooji, Yasin
    Ruan, Honghua
    Zhuge, Qiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2019, 20 (15)
  • [24] RAG Off-Target Activity Is in the Loop
    Blumenberg, Lili
    Skok, Jane A.
    TRENDS IN MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2015, 21 (12) : 733 - 735
  • [25] CRISPR Applications in Medicine Depend on Minimizing Off-Target Editing
    Turk, Rolf
    Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News, 2021, 41 (09): : 64 - 66
  • [26] Engineering guide RNA to reduce the off-target effects of CRISPR
    Wu, Jing
    Yin, Hao
    JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2019, 46 (11) : 523 - 529
  • [27] Mitigation of off-target toxicity in CRISPR-Cas9 screens for essential non-coding elements
    Tycko, Josh
    Wainberg, Michael
    Marinov, Georgi K.
    Ursu, Oana
    Hess, Gaelen T.
    Ego, Braeden K.
    Aradhana
    Li, Amy
    Truong, Alisa
    Trevino, Alexandro E.
    Spees, Kaitlyn
    Yao, David
    Kaplow, Irene M.
    Greenside, Peyton G.
    Morgens, David W.
    Phanstiel, Douglas H.
    Snyder, Michael P.
    Bintu, Lacramioara
    Greenleaf, William J.
    Kundaje, Anshul
    Bassik, Michael C.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
  • [28] Achieving Plant CRISPR Targeting that Limits Off-Target Effects
    Wolt, Jeffrey D.
    Wang, Kan
    Sashital, Dipali
    Lawrence-Dill, Carolyn J.
    PLANT GENOME, 2016, 9 (03):
  • [29] Engineering guide RNA to reduce the off-target effects of CRISPR
    Jing Wu
    Hao Yin
    JournalofGeneticsandGenomics, 2019, 46 (11) : 523 - 529
  • [30] CRISPR off-target analysis in genetically engineered rats and mice
    Anderson, Keith R.
    Haeussler, Maximilian
    Watanabe, Colin
    Janakiraman, Vasantharajan
    Lund, Jessica
    Modrusan, Zora
    Stinson, Jeremy
    Bei, Qixin
    Buechler, Andrew
    Yu, Charles
    Thamminana, Sobha R.
    Tam, Lucinda
    Sowick, Michael-Anne
    Alcantar, Tuija
    O'Neil, Natasha
    Li, Jinjie
    Ta, Linda
    Lima, Lisa
    Roose-Girma, Merone
    Rairdan, Xin
    Durinck, Steffen
    Warming, Soren
    NATURE METHODS, 2018, 15 (07) : 512 - +