Existence of benefit finding and posttraumatic growth in people treated for head and neck cancer : a systematic review

被引:31
|
作者
Harding, Sam [1 ]
Sanipour, Fatimeh [1 ]
Moss, Timothy [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ W England, Dept Psychol, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
[2] Univ W England, Ctr Appearance Res, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
来源
PEERJ | 2014年 / 2卷
关键词
Posttraumatic growth; Benefit finding; Head and neck; Cancer; Silver lining questionnaire; Posttraumatic growth inventory; Quality of life; Systematic review; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BREAST-CANCER; STRESS-DISORDER; POSITIVE CONSEQUENCES; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; HEALTH; ADJUSTMENT; DEPRESSION; SURGERY; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.256
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background. The impact of head and neck cancer (HNC) in long-term survivors differs widely among individuals, and a significant number of them suffer from the negative effects of disease, whereas others report significant positive effect. This systematic review investigated the evidence the implications of treatment for HNC and subsequent development of Benefit Finding (BF) or Posttraumatic Growth (PTG). Purpose. To understand how differing medical, psychological and social characteristics of HNC may lead to BF/PTG and subsequently inform post-treatment interventions to encourage positive outcomes. Method. In February 2012, five databases including Pubmed, and Psych Info, were searched, for peer-reviewed English-language publications. Search strings included key words pertaining to HNC, BF, and PTG. One thousand three hundred and sixty three publications were identified, reviewed, and reduced following Cochrane guidelines and inclusion/exclusion criteria specified by a group of maxillofacial consultants and psychologists. Publications were then quality assessed using the CASP Cohort Critical Appraisal tool. Findings. Five manuscripts met the search and selection criteria, and were sourced for review All studies were identified as being level fib evidence which is a medium level of quality. The majority of studies investigated benefit finding (80%) and were split between recruiting participant via cancer clinics and postal survey. They focused on the medical, psychological and social characteristics of the patient following completion of treatment for HNC. Conclusion. Demographic factors across the papers showed similar patterns of relationships across BE and PTG; that higher education/qualification and cohabitation/marriage are associated with increased BF/PTG. Similarly, overlap with disease characteristics and psychosocial factors where hope and optimism were both positively correlated with increased reported BF/PTG.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Nutritional prehabilitation in head and neck cancer: a systematic review
    Cantwell, Linda A.
    Fahy, Emer
    Walters, Emily R.
    Patterson, Joanne M.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (11) : 8831 - 8843
  • [32] Evidence for interventions to improve psychological outcomes in people with head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the literature
    Luckett, T.
    Britton, B.
    Clover, K.
    Rankin, N. M.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2011, 19 (07) : 871 - 881
  • [33] The relationship between coping style and psychological distress in people with head and neck cancer: A systematic review
    Morris, Nicolle
    Moghaddam, Nima
    Tickle, Anna
    Biswas, Sanchia
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 27 (03) : 734 - 747
  • [34] Evidence for interventions to improve psychological outcomes in people with head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the literature
    T. Luckett
    B. Britton
    K. Clover
    N. M. Rankin
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2011, 19 : 871 - 881
  • [35] Posttraumatic growth in colorectal cancer survivors: A systematic review
    Wang, Zhiming
    Chen, Xuan
    Zhou, Junrui
    Loke, Alice Yuen
    Li, Qiuping
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2023, 30 (04) : 740 - 753
  • [36] A systematic review of quality of life in head and neck cancer treated with surgery with or without adjuvant treatment
    Rathod, Shrinivas
    Livergant, Jonathan
    Klein, Jonathan
    Witterick, Ian
    Ringash, Jolie
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 51 (10) : 888 - 900
  • [37] A Systematic Review of Benefit-Finding and Growth in Pediatric Medical Populations
    Kritikos, Tessa K.
    Stiles-Shields, Colleen
    Winning, Adrien M.
    Starnes, Meredith
    Ohanian, Diana M.
    Clark, Olivia E.
    Del Castillo, Allison
    Chavez, Patricia
    Holmbeck, Grayson N.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 46 (09) : 1076 - 1090
  • [38] Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
    Antti A. Mäkitie
    Rasheed Omobolaji Alabi
    Sweet Ping Ng
    Robert P. Takes
    K. Thomas Robbins
    Ohad Ronen
    Ashok R. Shaha
    Patrick J. Bradley
    Nabil F. Saba
    Sandra Nuyts
    Asterios Triantafyllou
    Cesare Piazza
    Alessandra Rinaldo
    Alfio Ferlito
    Advances in Therapy, 2023, 40 : 3360 - 3380
  • [39] Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
    Maekitie, Antti A. A.
    Alabi, Rasheed Omobolaji
    Ng, Sweet Ping
    Takes, Robert P. P.
    Robbins, K. Thomas
    Ronen, Ohad
    Shaha, Ashok R. R.
    Bradley, Patrick J. J.
    Saba, Nabil F. F.
    Nuyts, Sandra
    Triantafyllou, Asterios
    Piazza, Cesare
    Rinaldo, Alessandra
    Ferlito, Alfio
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2023, 40 (08) : 3360 - 3380
  • [40] The Benefit of a Multidisciplinary Approach to the Patient Treated with (Chemo) Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer
    Paolo Bossi
    Salvatore Alfieri
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 2016, 17