A Multilevel Analysis of Patient Engagement and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Primary Care Practices of Accountable Care Organizations

被引:65
|
作者
Shortell, Stephen M. [1 ]
Poon, Bing Ying [1 ]
Ramsay, Patricia P. [1 ]
Rodriguez, Hector P. [1 ]
Ivey, Susan L. [1 ]
Huber, Thomas [1 ]
Rich, Jeremy [2 ]
Summerfelt, Tom [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] HealthCare Partners Inst Appl Res & Educ, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Advocate Hlth, Chicago, IL USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
patient engagement; patient-reported outcomes; accountable care organizations; RELATIONAL COORDINATION; DIABETES CARE; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; ACTIVATION MEASURE; SELF-MANAGEMENT; HEALTH-CARE; DEPRESSION; QUALITY; ILLNESS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-016-3980-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The growing movement toward more accountable care delivery and the increasing number of people with chronic illnesses underscores the need for primary care practices to engage patients in their own care. For adult primary care practices seeing patients with diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease, we examined the relationship between selected practice characteristics, patient engagement, and patient-reported outcomes of care. Cross-sectional multilevel observational study of 16 randomly selected practices in two large accountable care organizations (ACOs). Patients with diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease (CVD) who met study eligibility criteria (n = 4368) and received care in 2014 were randomly selected to complete a patient activation and PRO survey (51% response rate; n = 2176). Primary care team members of the 16 practices completed surveys that assessed practice culture, relational coordination, and teamwork (86% response rate; n = 411). Patient-reported outcomes included depression (PHQ-4), physical functioning (PROMIS SF12a), and social functioning (PROMIS SF8a), the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care instrument (PACIC-11), and the Patient Activation Measure instrument (PAM-13). Patient-level covariates included patient age, gender, education, insurance coverage, limited English language proficiency, blood pressure, HbA1c, LDL-cholesterol, and disease comorbidity burden. For each of the 16 practices, patient-centered culture and the degree of relational coordination among team members were measured using a clinician and staff survey. The implementation of shared decision-making activities in each practice was assessed using an operational leader survey. Having a patient-centered culture was positively associated with fewer depression symptoms (odds ratio [OR] = 1.51; confidence interval [CI] 1.04, 2.19) and better physical function scores (OR = 1.85; CI 1.25, 2.73). Patient activation was positively associated with fewer depression symptoms (OR = 2.26; CI 1.79, 2.86), better physical health (OR = 2.56; CI 2.00, 3.27), and better social health functioning (OR = 4.12; CI 3.21, 5.29). Patient activation (PAM-13) mediated the positive association between patients' experience of chronic illness care and each of the three patient-reported outcome measures-fewer depression symptoms, better physical health, and better social health. Relational coordination and shared decision-making activities reported by practices were not significantly associated with higher patient-reported outcome scores. Diabetic and CVD patients who received care from ACO-affiliated practices with more developed patient-centered cultures reported lower PHQ-4 depression symptom scores and better physical functioning. Diabetic and CVD patients who were more highly activated to participate in their care reported lower PHQ-4 scores and better physical and social outcomes of care.
引用
收藏
页码:640 / 647
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Future of urology: Embracing patient-centered care and patient-reported outcomes
    Nolazco, Jose Ignacio
    CURRENT UROLOGY, 2024, 18 (01) : 23 - 23
  • [43] Patient-reported outcomes in cancer care — hearing the patient voice at greater volume
    Thomas W. LeBlanc
    Amy P. Abernethy
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2017, 14 : 763 - 772
  • [44] Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Health Care To Engage Patients And Enhance Care
    Lavallee, Danielle C.
    Chenok, Kate E.
    Love, Rebecca M.
    Petersen, Carolyn
    Holve, Erin
    Segal, Courtney D.
    Franklin, Patricia D.
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2016, 35 (04) : 575 - 582
  • [45] The use of Patient Reported Outcomes and quality in primary care
    Huttin, Christine C.
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2019, 27 (01) : 111 - 113
  • [46] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRIMARY CARE ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESSES AND PATIENT-REPORTED CARE EXPERIENCES
    Aysola, Jaya
    Werner, Rachel M.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 : S75 - S75
  • [47] Evaluation of a Prediabetes Decision Aid on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Primary Care: a Pilot Study
    O'Brien, Matthew J.
    Cameron, Kenzie A.
    Vargas, Maria C.
    Mohr, Loretta
    Williams, Geoffrey C.
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Kandula, Namratha R.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (03) : 824 - 826
  • [48] Evaluation of a Prediabetes Decision Aid on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Primary Care: a Pilot Study
    Matthew J. O’Brien
    Kenzie A. Cameron
    Maria C. Vargas
    Loretta Mohr
    Geoffrey C. Williams
    Angela Fagerlin
    Namratha R. Kandula
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2021, 36 : 824 - 826
  • [49] Aligning for accountable care: Strategic practices for change in accountable care organizations
    Hilligoss, Brian
    Song, Paula H.
    McAlearney, Ann Scheck
    HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2017, 42 (03) : 192 - 202
  • [50] Developing a patient-reported outcome composite measure - Methods to aggregate patient-reported outcomes for more patient centricity in orthopaedic care
    Schoener, Lukas
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 : S54 - S54