Perioperative management of ventriculoperitoneal shunts during abdominal surgery

被引:32
|
作者
Li, Gordon [1 ]
Dutta, Sanjeev [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
SURGICAL NEUROLOGY | 2008年 / 70卷 / 05期
关键词
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt; Infection; Abdominal surgery;
D O I
10.1016/j.surneu.2007.08.050
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPSs) inserted for a variety of disorders may subsequently undergo gastrointestinal or urologic operations, and surgeons must determine the appropriate perioperative management to minimize the risk for shunt malfunction or infection. There is currently no established set of guidelines for this scenario. The objective of this study was to determine the risks and standard of practice for patients with VPSs undergoing abdominal surgery. Methods: A retrospective review of the charts of patients with VPSs who underwent abdominal or urologic surgery at the Stanford University Medical Center between 1995 and 2003 was performed. Data regarding type of abdominal surgery, level of contamination, choice of antibiotic therapy, perioperative management of the VPS, and outcomes were obtained. Results: Twenty-six patient charts were reviewed, for a total of 39 operations (5 urologic, 23 upper gastrointestinal, and 11 lower gastrointestinal). Of these, 3 were clean, 34 were clean-contaminated, and 2 were dirty operations. Seven cases were laparoscopic, whereas 32 were open. Thirty-four cases required opening the bowel or urologic system. No patient had preoperative shunt externalization. All except one patient received pre- and postoperative antibiotics, but the duration and type of antibiotics were widely variable. The remaining patient had an inguinal hernia repair and received only one preoperative dose of cephalexin. Purulent fluid was found in 2 cases. One VPS found lying in purulent material next to an anastomotic leak was externalized and subsequently revised. However, in another patient, a VPS found lying next to a purulent jejunal tear was not externalized. This patient returned 2 months later with a VPS malfunction. In the remaining 35 cases, no VPS infection or malfunction was noted over 2 to 10 years of follow-up. Conclusions: The data suggest that there is minimal risk for VPS malfunction or infection among patients undergoing routine clean and clean-contaminated abdominal and urologic surgeries. Patients with VPSs undergoing these operations do not need externalization of their shunt. None of the patients in this study had a contaminated procedure. For dirty procedures, surgeons should opt to externalize the shunt. Future studies will aim to better standardize the perioperative management of VPSs during abdominal surgery. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All tights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 497
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RETROGRADE MIGRATION OF THE ABDOMINAL CATHETER AS A COMPLICATION OF VENTRICULOPERITONEAL SHUNTS - THE FISHHOOK SIGN
    MARTINEZLAGE, JF
    POZA, M
    IZURA, V
    CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 1993, 9 (07) : 425 - 427
  • [32] Hemodialysis in children with ventriculoperitoneal shunts: prevalence, management and outcomes
    Wright, Elizabeth
    Fischbach, Michel
    Zaloszyc, Ariane
    Paglialonga, Fabio
    Aufricht, Christoph
    Dufek, Stephanie
    Bakkaloglu, Sevcan
    Klaus, Gunter
    Zurowska, Aleksandra
    Ekim, Mesiha
    Ariceta, Gema
    Holtta, Tuula
    Jankauskiene, Augustina
    Schmitt, Claus Peter
    Stefanidis, Constantinos J.
    Walle, Johan Vande
    Vondrak, Karel
    Edefonti, Alberto
    Shroff, Rukshana
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 31 (01) : 137 - 143
  • [33] Hemodialysis in children with ventriculoperitoneal shunts: prevalence, management and outcomes
    Elizabeth Wright
    Michel Fischbach
    Ariane Zaloszyc
    Fabio Paglialonga
    Christoph Aufricht
    Stephanie Dufek
    Sevcan Bakkaloğlu
    Günter Klaus
    Aleksandra Zurowska
    Mesiha Ekim
    Gema Ariceta
    Tuula Holtta
    Augustina Jankauskiene
    Claus Peter Schmitt
    Constantinos J. Stefanidis
    Johan Vande Walle
    Karel Vondrak
    Alberto Edefonti
    Rukshana Shroff
    Pediatric Nephrology, 2016, 31 : 137 - 143
  • [34] Anaesthesia for ventriculoperitoneal shunts
    Nienaber, J.
    SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 17 (01) : 73 - 75
  • [35] The Lowdown on Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts
    Roepke, Clare
    Zada, Gabriel
    Pham, Martin
    Jhun, Paul
    Bright, Aaron
    Herbert, Mel
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 67 (03) : 414 - 416
  • [36] Perioperative Lung Protective Ventilatory Management During Major Abdominal Surgery: A Hungarian Nationwide Survey
    Ruszkai, Zoltan
    Kiss, Erika
    Molnar, Zsolt
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 5 (01): : 19 - 27
  • [37] Perioperative Management for Rectal Migration of a Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt
    Cardinale, Jeffrey P.
    Carrillo, Carol O.
    Colon, Jimmie
    OCHSNER JOURNAL, 2020, 20 (02): : 239 - 241
  • [38] Evolution of perioperative pain management for major abdominal surgery.
    Skibowski, E.
    Mulholland, D.
    Neill, O.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 68 : 99 - 99
  • [39] Management of Hydrocephalus with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts: Review of 109 Cases of Children
    Dakurah, Thomas K.
    Adams, Fuseini
    Iddrissu, Mutawakilu
    Wepeba, George Kojo
    Akoto, Harry
    Bankah, Patrick
    Ametefe, Mawuli
    Kasu, Philip W.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 96 : 129 - 135
  • [40] Infectious Complications in Patients with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts after Intra-Abdominal Procedures
    Ong, Adrian W.
    Lapham, David A.
    Psarros, Stamatios
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2016, 82 (07) : E146 - E149