Sampling distributions, biases, variances, and confidence intervals for genetic correlations

被引:17
|
作者
Liu, BH
Knapp, SJ
Birkes, D
机构
[1] OREGON STATE UNIV,DEPT CROP & SOIL SCI,CORVALLIS,OR 97331
[2] OREGON STATE UNIV,DEPT STAT,CORVALLIS,OR 97331
关键词
bootstrap; jackknife; heritability; selection indices;
D O I
10.1007/s001220050375
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Genetic correlations (rho(g)) are frequently estimated from natural and experimental populations, yet many of the statistical properties of estimators of rho(g) are not known, and accurate methods have not been described for estimating the precision of estimates of rho(g). Our objective was to assess the statistical properties of multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), restricted maximum likelihood (REML), and maximum likelihood (ML) estimators of rho(g) by simulating bivariate normal samples for the one-way balanced linear model. We estimated probabilities of non-positive definite MANOVA estimates of genetic variance-covariance matrices and biases and variances of MANOVA, REML, and ML estimators of rho(g), and assessed the accuracy of parametric, jackknife, and bootstrap variance and confidence interval estimators for rho(g). MANOVA estimates of rho(g) were normally distributed. REML and ML estimates were normally distributed for rho(g) = 0.1, but skewed for rho(g) = 0.5 and 0.9. All of the estimators were biased. The MANOVA estimator was less biased than REML and ML estimators when heritability (H), the number of genotypes (n), and the number of replications (r) were low. The biases were otherwise nearly equal for different estimators and could not be reduced by jackknifing or bootstrapping. The variance of the MANOVA estimator was greater than the variance of the REML or ML estimator for most H, n, and r. Bootstrapping produced estimates of the variance of rho(g) close to the known variance, especially for REML and ML. The observed coverages of the REML and ML bootstrap interval estimators were consistently close to stated coverages, whereas the observed coverage of the MANOVA bootstrap interval estimator was unsatisfactory for some H, rho(g), n, and r. The other interval estimators produced unsatisfactory coverages. REML and ML bootstrap interval estimates were narrower than MANOVA bootstrap interval estimates for most H, rho(g), n, and r.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 19
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Toward using confidence intervals to compare correlations
    Guang Yong Zou
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2007, 12 (04) : 399 - 413
  • [42] ADDITIVE AND NONADDITIVE GENETIC CORRELATIONS .1. PROPERTIES OF SAMPLING DISTRIBUTIONS
    HOHLS, T
    CLARKE, GPY
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 37 (08) : 919 - 935
  • [43] JACKKNIFE VARIANCES AND CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS OF THE MANTEL-HAENSZEL ESTIMATOR
    PIGEOT, I
    STRUGHOLTZ, H
    STATISTICAL PAPERS, 1994, 35 (03) : 255 - 272
  • [44] Confidence Intervals for Common Variance of Normal Distributions
    Smithpreecha, Narudee
    Niwitpong, Sa-Aat
    Niwitpong, Suparat
    INTEGRATED UNCERTAINTY IN KNOWLEDGE MODELLING AND DECISION MAKING, IUKM 2016, 2016, 9978 : 562 - 573
  • [45] Bootstrap confidence intervals in mixtures of discrete distributions
    Karlis, Dimitris
    Patilea, Valentin
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2008, 138 (08) : 2313 - 2329
  • [46] CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS ON INDIVIDUAL VARIANCES IN 2-WAY MODELS
    KAZEMPOUR, MK
    GRAYBILL, FA
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 1992, 14 (01) : 29 - 37
  • [47] Bootstrap confidence intervals for adaptive cluster sampling
    Christman, MC
    BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (02) : 503 - 510
  • [49] Confidence Intervals for Quantiles in Ranked Set Sampling
    Mahdizadeh, M.
    Zamanzade, Ehsan
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSACTION A-SCIENCE, 2019, 43 (A6): : 3017 - 3028
  • [50] CONFIDENCE INTERVALS IN CAVALIERI SAMPLING WITH LOCAL ERRORS
    Garcia-Finana, Marta
    Keller, Simon S.
    Roberts, Neil
    ECS10: THE10TH EUROPEAN CONGRESS OF STEREOLOGY AND IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2009, : 241 - +