How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands

被引:202
|
作者
de Vente, Joris [1 ]
Reed, Mark S. [2 ,3 ]
Stringer, Lindsay C. [4 ]
Valente, Sandra [5 ]
Newig, Jens [6 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, CEBAS, Spanish Natl Res Council, Madrid, Spain
[2] Newcastle Univ, Sch Agr Food & Rural Dev, Inst Agrifood Res & Innovat, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Newcastle Univ, Sch Agr Food & Rural Dev, Ctr Rural Econ, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Sustainabil Res Inst Sch, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Aveiro, Ctr Environm & Marine Studies CESAM, Dept Environm & Planning, Aveiro, Portugal
[6] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Res Grp Governance, Luneburg, Germany
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2016年 / 21卷 / 02期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
drylands; environmental management; land degradation; social learning; stakeholder engagement; sustainable land management; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; DEGRADATION; BIODIVERSITY; INVOLVEMENT; COMMUNITIES; CHALLENGES; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.5751/ES-08053-210224
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Although the design of participatory processes to manage social-ecological systems needs to be adapted to local contexts, it is unclear which elements of process design might be universal. We use empirical evidence to analyze the extent to which context and process design can enable or impede stakeholder participation and facilitate beneficial environmental and social outcomes. To explore the role of design and minor variations in local context on the outcomes of participatory processes, we interviewed participants and facilitators from 11 case studies in which different process designs were used to select sustainable land management options in Spain and Portugal. We analyzed interview data using quantitative and qualitative approaches. Results showed that although some aspects of local context affected process outcomes, factors associated with process design were more significant. Processes leading to more beneficial environmental and social outcomes included the following: the legitimate representation of stakeholders; professional facilitation including structured methods for aggregating information and balancing power dynamics among participants; and provision of information and decision-making power to all participants. Although processes initiated or facilitated by government bodies led to significantly less trust, information gain, and learning, decisions in these processes were more likely to be accepted and implemented. To further test the role of context in determining the outcomes of participation, we interviewed facilitators from a process that was replicated across 13 dryland study sites around the world, reflecting much greater national variations in context. The similarity of outcomes across these sites suggested that the socio-cultural context in which the process was replicated had little impact on its outcomes, as long as certain design principles were fulfilled. Overall, our findings provide a solid empirical basis for good practice in the design of participatory processes in the management of social-ecological systems.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How Does Government Efficiency Affect Health Outcomes? The Empirical Evidence from 156 Countries
    Ding, Yemin
    Chin, Lee
    Li, Fangyan
    Deng, Peidong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (15)
  • [32] How Does the Digital Economy Affect Sustainable Urban Development? Empirical Evidence from Chinese Cities
    Guo, Qiuqiu
    Ma, Xiaoyu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [33] How Does the Land Rental Market Participation Affect Household Efficiency? Evidence from Rural China
    Guo, Xiaolin
    Shi, Guanming
    Zheng, Linyi
    Qian, Wenrong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (23)
  • [34] How Does Land Tenure Security Affect Farm Succession? Evidence from Apple Growers in China
    Zhang, Qiangqiang
    Tian, Jiaying
    Zheng, Jie
    Abdullahi, Nazir Muhammad
    Huo, Xuexi
    LAND, 2022, 11 (07)
  • [35] How does land titling affect credit demand, supply, access, and rationing: Evidence from China
    Cheng, Wenli
    Zhou, Nan
    Zhang, Longyao
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE, 2021, 69 (03): : 383 - 414
  • [36] How does gender affect the perceived security of land and property rights? Evidence from 33 countries
    Feyertag, Joseph
    Childress, Malcolm
    Langdown, Ian
    Locke, Anna
    Nizalov, Denys
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 104
  • [37] How does municipal policy affect state and local actions? Evidence from land conservation spending
    Lang, Corey
    Prendergast, Patrick
    Pearson-Merkowitz, Shanna
    RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 54 : 23 - 36
  • [38] How does context influence entrepreneurship education outcomes? Empirical evidence from Bangladesh and Germany
    Dickel, Petra
    Kleemann, Linda
    Bose, Tarun Kanti
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL VENTURING, 2019, 11 (03) : 283 - 308
  • [39] How organizational context affects bioethical decision-making: Pharmacists' management of gatekeeping processes in retail and hospital settings
    Chiarello, Elizabeth
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2013, 98 : 319 - 329
  • [40] How does the real earnings management affect firms innovative? Evidence from US firms
    Chouaibi, Jamel
    Zouari, Ghazi
    Khlifi, Sawssen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 61 (01) : 151 - 169