How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands

被引:202
|
作者
de Vente, Joris [1 ]
Reed, Mark S. [2 ,3 ]
Stringer, Lindsay C. [4 ]
Valente, Sandra [5 ]
Newig, Jens [6 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, CEBAS, Spanish Natl Res Council, Madrid, Spain
[2] Newcastle Univ, Sch Agr Food & Rural Dev, Inst Agrifood Res & Innovat, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Newcastle Univ, Sch Agr Food & Rural Dev, Ctr Rural Econ, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Sustainabil Res Inst Sch, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Aveiro, Ctr Environm & Marine Studies CESAM, Dept Environm & Planning, Aveiro, Portugal
[6] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Res Grp Governance, Luneburg, Germany
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2016年 / 21卷 / 02期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
drylands; environmental management; land degradation; social learning; stakeholder engagement; sustainable land management; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; DEGRADATION; BIODIVERSITY; INVOLVEMENT; COMMUNITIES; CHALLENGES; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.5751/ES-08053-210224
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Although the design of participatory processes to manage social-ecological systems needs to be adapted to local contexts, it is unclear which elements of process design might be universal. We use empirical evidence to analyze the extent to which context and process design can enable or impede stakeholder participation and facilitate beneficial environmental and social outcomes. To explore the role of design and minor variations in local context on the outcomes of participatory processes, we interviewed participants and facilitators from 11 case studies in which different process designs were used to select sustainable land management options in Spain and Portugal. We analyzed interview data using quantitative and qualitative approaches. Results showed that although some aspects of local context affected process outcomes, factors associated with process design were more significant. Processes leading to more beneficial environmental and social outcomes included the following: the legitimate representation of stakeholders; professional facilitation including structured methods for aggregating information and balancing power dynamics among participants; and provision of information and decision-making power to all participants. Although processes initiated or facilitated by government bodies led to significantly less trust, information gain, and learning, decisions in these processes were more likely to be accepted and implemented. To further test the role of context in determining the outcomes of participation, we interviewed facilitators from a process that was replicated across 13 dryland study sites around the world, reflecting much greater national variations in context. The similarity of outcomes across these sites suggested that the socio-cultural context in which the process was replicated had little impact on its outcomes, as long as certain design principles were fulfilled. Overall, our findings provide a solid empirical basis for good practice in the design of participatory processes in the management of social-ecological systems.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes of Participatory Decision Making: Evidence from Albania
    Dauti, Marsela
    EAST EUROPEAN POLITICS AND SOCIETIES, 2015, 29 (01) : 226 - 247
  • [2] Why and How Does Participatory Governance Affect Policy Outcomes? Theory and Evidence from the Electric Sector
    Baldwin, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2020, 30 (03) : 365 - 382
  • [3] How does entrepreneurial opportunity affect the decision-making process of effectuation? Evidence from China
    Long, Dan
    Xia, Zi-yao
    Hu, Wang-bin
    KYBERNETES, 2017, 46 (06) : 980 - 999
  • [4] The Employment of Digital Simulation in the Planning Departments in US Cities How does it affect design and decision-making processes?
    Al-Douri, Firas
    COMPUTING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW, (ECAADE 2018), VOL 2, 2018, : 539 - 548
  • [5] Does where you are from affect how you land? Evidence from land transactions of Chinese manufacturers
    Fei, Xuan
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2020, 27 (07) : 525 - 532
  • [6] How Does Fiscal Decentralization Affect Health Outcomes? Evidence from China
    Chen, Chen
    Zheng, Meng
    Zhu, Junli
    RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2023, 16 : 1893 - 1903
  • [7] How does tourism development affect the land market? Evidence from land transaction data in China
    Song, Changyao
    Yin, Tingting
    Zhi, Qian
    Gu, Jiaqian
    Li, Xinjian
    TOURISM REVIEW, 2024,
  • [8] How does digital finance affect sustainable economic growth? Evidence from China
    Yang Liu
    Aisyah Abdul Rahman
    Syajarul Imna Mohd Amin
    Roslan Ja’afar
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 103164 - 103178
  • [9] How does digital finance affect sustainable economic growth? Evidence from China
    Liu, Yang
    Rahman, Aisyah Abdul
    Amin, Syajarul Imna Mohd
    Ja'afar, Roslan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (46) : 103164 - 103178
  • [10] How does the internet affect regional sustainable development? Fresh evidence from China
    Xiaole Wang
    Feng Dong
    Yajie Liu
    Yangfan Li
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11 (1):