Is Shared Decision Making in Prostate Cancer Restrained by Evidence-Based Medicine?

被引:0
|
作者
Irani, Jacques [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU La Miletrie, Dept Urol, F-86000 Poitiers, France
关键词
Androgen deprivation therapy; Prostate cancer; Screening; Prostate-specific antigen; Chemoprevention; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SELENIUM SUPPLEMENTATION; ANDROGEN-DEPRIVATION; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; SEARCH DATABASE; BETA-CAROTENE; PHASE-III; VITAMIN-E; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.eursup.2010.11.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) forms the basis for treatment decisions in many disease areas including prostate cancer, but such decisions may not necessarily be appropriate for every patient. Objective: This review examines clinical data relating to the management of prostate cancer, including chemoprevention, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening and timing of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Evidence acquisition: During the 2010 Annual Congress of the European Association of Urology in Barcelona, Spain, a satellite symposium was held on the individualised management of patients with prostate cancer. This paper is based on one of the presentations at the symposium. Data were retrieved from recent review articles, original articles and abstracts relating to prostate cancer management including chemoprevention, screening and ADT, as well as treatment of prostate cancer from the patient's perspective. Evidence synthesis: A number of options can be considered in the management of prostate cancer, whether one takes the route of preventing the disease, actively screening men in order to identify tumours at an early stage or to focus on treating the disease with curative intent. One of the most promising chemopreventative strategies involves the 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors; data are also accruing on toremifene, a selective oestrogen-receptor modulator. Screening for prostate cancer remains controversial while an active surveillance for presumed insignificant disease is gaining in popularity. ADT remains the mainstay of treatment for locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer; intermittent ADT is gaining acceptance as a means to reduce associated side-effects of treatment. Research shows that patients want to be actively involved in the treatment decision-making process. Conclusions: EBM should not preclude the Urologist considering other treatment options for patients with prostate cancer, who themselves want to participate in selecting the most appropriate treatment. (C) 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 787
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Links between evidence-based medicine and shared decision-making in courses for doctors in training: a scoping review
    Simons, Mary
    Rapport, Frances
    Zurynski, Yvonne
    Stoodley, Marcus
    Cullis, Jeremy
    Davidson, Andrew S.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [32] A personalized decision aid for prostate cancer shared decision making
    Hilary P. Bagshaw
    Alejandro Martinez
    Nastaran Heidari
    David Scheinker
    Alan Pollack
    Radka Stoyanova
    Eric Horwitz
    Gerard Morton
    Amar U. Kishan
    Mark K. Buyyounouski
    [J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21
  • [33] A personalized decision aid for prostate cancer shared decision making
    Bagshaw, Hilary P.
    Martinez, Alejandro
    Heidari, Nastaran
    Scheinker, David
    Pollack, Alan
    Stoyanova, Radka
    Horwitz, Eric
    Morton, Gerard
    Kishan, Amar U.
    Buyyounouski, Mark K.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [34] The Art of Management Decision Making: From Intuition to Evidence-based Medicine
    Sheth, Sameer A.
    Kwon, Churl-Su
    Barker, Fred G., II
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 45 (02) : 333 - +
  • [35] Evidence-based medicine and its role in ethical decision-making
    Borry, P
    Schotsmans, P
    Dierickx, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2006, 12 (03) : 306 - 311
  • [36] Decision boxes for clinicians to support evidence-based practice and shared decision making: the user experience
    Giguere, Anik
    Legare, France
    Grad, Roland
    Pluye, Pierre
    Haynes, R. Brian
    Cauchon, Michel
    Rousseau, Francois
    Alvarez Argote, Juliana
    Labrecque, Michel
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2012, 7
  • [37] Decision boxes for clinicians to support evidence-based practice and shared decision making: the user experience
    Anik Giguere
    France Légaré
    Roland Grad
    Pierre Pluye
    R Brian Haynes
    Michel Cauchon
    François Rousseau
    Juliana Alvarez Argote
    Michel Labrecque
    [J]. Implementation Science, 7
  • [38] Decision analysis in evidence-based decision making
    Tavakoli, M
    Davies, HTO
    Thomson, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2000, 6 (02) : 111 - 120
  • [39] Evidence-based medicine and precision medicine: complementary approaches to clinical decision-making
    Chow, Ngai
    Gallo, Lucas
    Busse, Jason W.
    [J]. PRECISION CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 1 (02) : 60 - 64
  • [40] Use of evidence in acute stroke decision-making: Implications for evidence-based medicine
    Langlois-Therien, Timothe
    Dewar, Brian
    Upshur, Ross E. G.
    Shamy, Michel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (05) : 733 - 740