QUALITY OF THE EDUCATION SYSTEM VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS

被引:0
|
作者
Veselkova, Alexandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Econ Bratislava, Fac Natl Econ, Dept Econ, Dolnozemska Cesta 1, Bratislava 85235, Slovakia
关键词
education; competitiveness; the PISA project; the PIAAC project; index GCI; PISA; SKILLS; PIAAC;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The global economy must seek new approaches and policies in the 21st century to promote economic progress. The unification of the world market as a result of globalization trends also forces individual countries to increase their competitiveness, which is the essential basis of knowledge, education. A decisive factor of the economic growth and thus competitiveness is the availability of educated human capital and the development of its potential. Economic growth should not be the sole objective of economic policy but should contribute to people's well-being and development, so it should be human-oriented, the resources needed to increase the well-being of better education. The paper is aimed at analyzing and comparing the achieved levels of education systems of the Slovak Republic, the Czech Republic and Finland based on two OECD research studies (PISA and PIAAC). The PISA study evaluates the mathematical, reading and natural literacy of 15-year-old pupils, while the PIAAC study deals with numerical and mathematical literacy testing of 16-65 year olds and problem solving in the information technology environment. The quality of the country education system is also evaluated by the GCI index, based on its selected determinants of the 4th and 5th pillar. Information gathered could point to the effectiveness of the education system in selected countries and at the same time inform about those areas where efforts should be made to improve the education system so that young people are competitive in global labour markets.
引用
收藏
页码:2886 / 2893
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EVALUATION OF THE NATIONAL HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM'S COMPETITIVENESS: THEORETICAL MODEL
    Stonkiene, Marija
    Matkeviciene, Renata
    Vaiginiene, Erika
    [J]. FUTURE OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2014, : 1810 - 1822
  • [32] A quality system for engineering education
    Cedergren, M
    Oscarsson, T
    [J]. 3RD BALTIC REGION SEMINAR ON ENGINEERING EDUCATION, SEMINAR PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 148 - 151
  • [33] QUALITY VERSUS QUANTITY IN AMERICAN MEDICAL EDUCATION
    WILLIAMS, G
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1966, 153 (3739) : 956 - &
  • [34] QUANTITY VERSUS QUALITY IN TEACHER-EDUCATION
    CORREA, H
    [J]. COMPARATIVE EDUCATION REVIEW, 1964, 8 (02) : 141 - 145
  • [35] Quality assurance in an education system
    Mukherjee, SP
    [J]. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, 1995, 6 (5-6): : 571 - 578
  • [36] Quality and regional competitiveness
    Jansson, Johan
    Waxell, Anders
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2011, 43 (09): : 2237 - 2252
  • [37] Croatian competitiveness and quality
    Lazibat, T.
    [J]. Annals of DAAAM for 2004 & Proceedings of the 15th International DAAAM Symposium: INTELLIGNET MANUFACTURING & AUTOMATION: GLOBALISATION - TECHNOLOGY - MEN - NATURE, 2004, : 251 - 252
  • [38] QUALITY, PARTICIPATION, AND COMPETITIVENESS
    COLE, RE
    BACDAYAN, P
    WHITE, BJ
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1993, 35 (03) : 68 - 81
  • [39] QUALITY, STRATEGY, AND COMPETITIVENESS
    BELOHLAV, JA
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1993, 35 (03) : 55 - 67
  • [40] Competitiveness versus welfare for Romania
    Cioban, Gabriela-Liliana
    [J]. CRAFTING GLOBAL COMPETITIVE ECONOMIES: 2020 VISION STRATEGIC PLANNING & SMART IMPLEMENTATION, VOLS I-IV, 2014, : 334 - 338