ORWARE:: an aid to environmental technology chain assessment

被引:21
|
作者
Assefa, G [1 ]
Björklund, A [1 ]
Eriksson, O [1 ]
Frostell, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Inst Technol, Div Ind Ecol, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
material flow analysis; substance flow analysis; life cycle assessment; technology assessment; waste management;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article discusses the ORWARE tool, a model originally developed for environmental systems analysis of waste management systems, and shows its prospect as a tool for environmental technology chain assessment. Different concepts of technology assessment are presented to put ORWARE into context in the discussion that has been going for more than two decades since the establishment of the US Congressional Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). An even-handed assessment is important in different ways such as reproducibility, reliability, credibility, etc. Conventional technology assessment (TA) relied on the judgements and intuition of the assessors. A computer-based tool such as ORWARE provides a basis for transparency and a structured management of input and output data that cover ecological and economic parameters. This permits consistent and coherent technology assessments. Using quantitative analysis as in ORWARE makes comparison and addition of values across chain of technologies easier. We illustrate the application of the model in environmental technology chain assessment through a study of alternative technical systems linking waste management to vehicle fuel production and use. The principles of material and substance flow modelling, life cycle perspective, and graphical modelling featured in ORWARE offer a generic structure for environmentally focused TA of chains and networks of technical processes. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 274
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental and economic performance assessment of desalination supply chain
    Balfaqih, Hasan
    Al-Nory, Malak T.
    Nopiah, Zulkifli Mohd
    Saibani, Nizaroyani
    DESALINATION, 2017, 406 : 2 - 9
  • [32] Mobility data to aid assessment of human responses to extreme environmental conditions
    Hatchett, Benjamin J.
    Benmarhnia, Tarik
    Guirguis, Kristen
    VanderMolen, Kristin
    Gershunov, Alexander
    Kerwin, Heather
    Khlystov, Andrey
    Lambrecht, Kathryn M.
    Samburova, Vera
    LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH, 2021, 5 (10): : E665 - E667
  • [33] A fuzzy decision aid model for environmental performance assessment in waste recycling
    Nasiri, Fuzhan
    Huang, Gordon
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2008, 23 (06) : 677 - 689
  • [34] Competition for environmental aid and aid fungibility
    Hadjiyiannis, Costas
    Hatzipanayotou, Panos
    Michael, Michael S.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 65 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [35] The Environmental and Technology Drivers of Value Chain Integration: An Empirical Study
    Peng, David
    ICOSCM 2009 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2009, 3 : 205 - 205
  • [36] Environmental impact assessment in health technology assessment: principles, approaches, and challenges
    Toolan, Michael
    Walpole, Sarah
    Shah, Koonal
    Kenny, Juliet
    Jonsson, Pall
    Crabb, Nick
    Greaves, Felix
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [37] Hearing aid technology: model-based concepts and assessment Foreword
    Kollmeier, Birger
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2018, 57 : S1 - S2
  • [38] Hearing aid technology: model-based concepts and assessment Foreword
    Johnson, Earl E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2018, 57 : S29 - S30
  • [39] The potential for technology to aid quantitative assessment in cutaneous T cell lymphoma
    Gu, Lilly
    Oh, Yuna
    Smith, Mary P.
    Kurtansky, Nicholas R.
    Horwitz, Steven
    Kahn, Niloufer
    Moskowitz, Alison
    Noor, Sarah J.
    Myskowski, Patricia
    Rotemberg, Veronica
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2022, 63 (14) : 3501 - 3503
  • [40] Who gets environmental aid? The characteristics of global environmental aid distribution
    Figaj M.
    Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2010, 12 (3) : 97 - 114