Intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review

被引:84
|
作者
Park, Sue Kyung [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kang, Daehee [1 ,3 ]
McGlynn, Katherine A. [2 ]
Garcia-Closas, Montserrat [2 ]
Kim, Yeonju [1 ]
Yoo, Keun Young [1 ,4 ]
Brinton, Louise A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Seoul 110799, South Korea
[2] NIH, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, NCI, Rockville, MD 20892 USA
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Canc Res Inst, Seoul 110799, South Korea
[4] Natl Canc Ctr, Goyang Si 410769, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1186/bcr1850
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction Various perinatal factors, including birth weight, birth order, maternal age, gestational age, twin status, and parental smoking, have been postulated to affect breast cancer risk in daughters by altering the hormonal environment of the developing fetal mammary glands. Despite ample biologic plausibility, epidemiologic studies to date have yielded conflicting results. We investigated the associations between perinatal factors and subsequent breast cancer risk through meta-analyses. Methods We reviewed breast cancer studies published from January 1966 to February 2007 that included data on birth weight, birth order, maternal age, gestational age, twin status, and maternal or paternal smoking. Meta-analyses using random effect models were employed to summarize the results. Results We found that heavier birth weights were associated with increased breast cancer risk, with studies involving five categories of birth weight identifying odds ratios (ORs) of 1.24 95% confidence interval [ CI] 1.04 to 1.48) for 4,000 g or more and 1.15 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.26) for 3,500 g to 3,999 g, relative to a birth weight of 2,500 to 2,599 g. These studies provided no support for a J-shaped relationship of birthweight to risk. Support for an association with birthweight was also derived from studies based on three birth weight categories (OR 1.15 [ 95% CI 1.01 to 1.31] for >= 4,000 g relative to < 3,000 g) and two birth weight categories (OR 1.09 [ 95% CI 1.02 to 1.18] for >= 3,000 g relative to < 3,000 g). Women born to older mothers and twins were also at some increased risk, but the results were heterogeneous across studies and publication years. Birth order, prematurity, and maternal smoking were unrelated to breast cancer risk. Conclusion Our findings provide some support for the hypothesis that in utero exposures reflective of higher endogenous hormone levels could affect risk for development of breast cancer in adulthood.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cholesterol and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies
    Fassier, Philippine
    Latino-Martel, Paule
    His, Mathilde
    Norat, Teresa
    Chan, Doris S. M.
    Blacher, Jacques
    Hercberg, Serge
    Galan, Pilar
    Druesne-Pecollo, Nathalie
    Touvier, Mathilde
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2015, 67 : 324 - 325
  • [42] Risk factors of pain in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Laurence Leysen
    David Beckwée
    Jo Nijs
    Roselien Pas
    Thomas Bilterys
    Sofie Vermeir
    Nele Adriaenssens
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017, 25 : 3607 - 3643
  • [43] Accuracy of telomerase in estimating breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Winnikow, Erik P.
    Medeiros, Lidia R.
    Edelweiss, Maria I.
    Rosa, Daniela D.
    Edelweiss, Marcia
    Simoes, Priscyla W.
    Silva, Fabio R.
    Silva, Bruno R.
    Rosa, Maria I.
    [J]. BREAST, 2012, 21 (01): : 1 - 7
  • [44] Risk factors for metachronous contralateral breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Akdeniz, Delal
    Schmidt, Marjanka K.
    Seynaeve, Caroline M.
    McCool, Danielle
    Giardiello, Daniele
    van den Broek, Alexandra J.
    Hauptmann, Michael
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Hooning, Maartje J.
    [J]. BREAST, 2019, 44 : 1 - 14
  • [45] Mammographic density and breast cancer risk factors: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Thakrar, Dixa
    Grenville, Zoe
    Desai, Trishna
    Gathani, Toral
    Reeves, Gillian K.
    Barnes, Isobel
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [46] Risk factors of pain in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Leysen, Laurence
    Beckwee, David
    Nijs, Jo
    Pas, Roselien
    Bilterys, Thomas
    Vermeir, Sofie
    Adriaenssens, Nele
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2017, 25 (12) : 3607 - 3643
  • [47] Risk and incidence of breast cancer in transgender individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Corso, Giovanni
    Gandini, Sara
    D'Ecclesiis, Oriana
    Mazza, Manuelita
    Magnoni, Francesca
    Veronesi, Paolo
    Galimberti, Viviana
    La Vecchia, Carlo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2023, 32 (03) : 207 - 214
  • [48] Risk of breast cancer among patients with psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tung, Tao-Hsin
    Jiesisibieke, Zhu Liduzi
    Cheng, Yu-Hsien
    Chi, Ching-Chi
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 316 (01)
  • [50] Analysis of risk factors associated with breast cancer in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Hulin
    Shi, Suling
    Gao, Jinnan
    Guo, Jun
    Li, Min
    Wang, Linying
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (05) : 1344 - 1353