Analysis of User Control Attainment in SMR-based Brain Computer Interfaces

被引:2
|
作者
Matanga, Y. [1 ]
Djouani, K. [1 ]
Kurien, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tshwane Univ Technol, FSATI, Staatsartillery Rd,Bldg 6, Pretoria, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Electroencephalogram (EEG); Brain Computer Interface (BCI); Sensorimotor rhythms (SMR); Control attainment; EEG; SIGNAL; EMG;
D O I
10.1016/j.irbm.2018.08.001
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Context: Sensorimotor rhythms (SMR) have been the neuronal phenomena of choice in non-invasive EEG-based endogenous brain computer interfaces (BCIs) for more than two decades and SMR-based BCIs have achieved the highest degree of freedom control so far. Nevertheless, they are subject to long periods of training prior to attaining a satisfactory level of control requiring users to learn to modulate their rhythms. The goal of this work is to analyse this problem, discuss the causes of the slow rise in performance and provide recommendations on alternative solutions to quicken control attainment. Methods: The study has been conducted by both theoretical and empirical analysis. A theoretical model has been developed that explains the principle operation of SMR-based BCIs focusing on major performance contributors respectively the user, periodic feature selection and the translation model thus contrasting user adaptation and machine learning. Five able-bodied subjects (age: 26 +/- 2.55) participated in six sessions of online computer cursor control experiments over three weeks to evaluate control attainment performances and gather data for statistical analysis (similar to 1152 trials per subject). Correlation (r(2)) between user control features and target position over sessions was assessed as an estimate of neural adaptation and the predictive power of the translation algorithm (10 x 10 fold cross-validation) was calculated over sessions as an estimate of machine adaptation. Auxiliary performance metrics were evaluated. Results: Features-target correlation increased over sessions, while at the same time the predictive accuracy (R-2) of the translation model remained averagely steady and very low (R-best(2)= 0.04) demonstrating continuous user adaptation and low model predictive accuracy. Periodic feature selection was theoretically discussed to be very instrumental and its relevance was empirically illustrated. Conclusions: The study concludes that the slow control attainment in SMR-based Bas is due to its reliance on user training (neural adaptation) which is adaptive but too slow in the context of SMR modulations and due to the weak decoding of the neuronal phenomenon utilised by the user. As a recommendation, the optimality of the feature selection algorithm could be looked at to guarantee the use of the most relevant features. However and most importantly the predictive power of the translation model should be significantly improved in order to quicken control attainment as thereafter the control attainment effort could be shifted from neural adaptation to machine learning. (C) 2018 AGBM. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 333
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A reductionist approach to the analysis of learning in brain–computer interfaces
    Zachary Danziger
    [J]. Biological Cybernetics, 2014, 108 : 183 - 201
  • [42] Control-display mapping in brain-computer interfaces
    Thurlings, Marieke E.
    van Erp, Jan B. F.
    Brouwer, Anne-Marie
    Blankertz, Benjamin
    Werkhoven, Peter
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2012, 55 (05) : 564 - 580
  • [43] On the control of brain-computer interfaces by users with cerebral palsy
    Daly, Ian
    Billinger, Martin
    Laparra-Hernandez, Jose
    Aloise, Fabio
    Lloria Garcia, Mariano
    Faller, Josef
    Scherer, Reinhold
    Mueller-Putz, Gernot
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 124 (09) : 1787 - 1797
  • [44] Editorial: Brain-connectivity-based computer interfaces
    Galazzo, Ilaria Boscolo
    Tonin, Luca
    Miladinovic, Aleksandar
    Storti, Silvia Francesca
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [45] Experimental platform of brain computer orientated interfaces to control wheelchairs
    Richard, M. A.
    Gentiletti, G. G.
    [J]. IV LATIN AMERICAN CONGRESS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2007, BIOENGINEERING SOLUTIONS FOR LATIN AMERICA HEALTH, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, 18 (1,2): : 1127 - 1130
  • [46] EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces
    Wang, Yijun
    Nakanishi, Masaki
    Zhang, Dan
    [J]. NEURAL INTERFACE: FRONTIERS AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 1101 : 41 - 65
  • [47] Towards Brain-Computer Interfaces for Drone Swarm Control
    Jeong, Ji-Hoon
    Lee, Dae-Hyeok
    Ahn, Hyung-Ju
    Lee, Seong-Whan
    [J]. 2020 8TH INTERNATIONAL WINTER CONFERENCE ON BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE (BCI), 2020, : 197 - 200
  • [48] EEG-based brain-computer interfaces
    McFarland, D. J.
    Wolpaw, J. R.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 4 : 194 - 200
  • [49] Comment on 'Fast attainment of computer cursor control with noninvasively acquired brain signals'
    Poli, Riccardo
    Salvaris, Mathew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 8 (05)
  • [50] Some Aspects of Voice User Interfaces Development for Internet and Computer Control Applications
    Maskeliunas, R.
    Ratkevicius, K.
    Rudzionis, V.
    [J]. ELEKTRONIKA IR ELEKTROTECHNIKA, 2013, 19 (02) : 53 - 56