Are External Auditors Concerned about Cyber Incidents? Evidence from Audit Fees

被引:39
|
作者
Li, He [1 ]
No, Won Gyun [2 ]
Boritz, J. Efrim [3 ]
机构
[1] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Rutgers State Univ, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[3] Univ Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
来源
关键词
audit fees; cybersecurity; cyber incident; hacking; cybersecurity risk disclosure; INFORMATION SECURITY BREACHES; CLIENT-ACCEPTANCE; POLICY COMPLIANCE; OPERATIONAL RISK; ECONOMIC-IMPACT; TOP MANAGEMENT; MARKET VALUE; DISCLOSURES; FIRMS; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.2308/ajpt-52593
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
While the importance of addressing cybersecurity is widely acknowledged, there is no explicit requirement by regulators or standard setters for auditors to do so. This paper investigates (1) whether external auditors respond to cyber incidents by charging higher audit fees, (2) whether they anticipate and price material cybersecurity risk before cyber incidents occur, and (3) whether increases in audit fees for firms experiencing a cyber incident in the current period are associated with subsequent cyber incidents. We find that only cyber incidents are associated with increases in audit fees and that the association is driven by more severe incidents. We also find that increases in audit fees are smaller for firms with prior cybersecurity risk disclosure after 2011 when the SEC issued cybersecurity disclosure guidance. Finally, larger increases in audit fees for firms experiencing cyber incidents in the current period are associated with a lower likelihood of subsequent cyber incidents.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 171
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Do failed auditors receive lower audit fees from continuing engagements?
    Kam-Wah Lai
    Ferdinand A. Gul
    [J]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2021, 56 : 1159 - 1190
  • [22] Additional Evidence on the Relationship between an Internal Audit Function and External Audit Fees in Australia
    Singh, Harjinder
    Woodliff, David
    Sultana, Nigar
    Newby, Rick
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDITING, 2014, 18 (01) : 27 - 39
  • [23] Audit report timeliness: Does internal audit function coordination with external auditors matter? Empirical evidence from Tunisia
    Oussii, Ahmed Atef
    Taktak, Neila Boulila
    [J]. EUROMED JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2018, 13 (01) : 60 - 74
  • [24] Audit quality and fees: Evidence from Spain
    Guzman-Raja, Isidoro
    Gonzalez-Sanchez, Mariano
    Rua-Alonso-De-Corrales, Enrique
    Sanchez-Garcia, Juan Francisco
    [J]. SPANISH JOURNAL OF FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING-REVISTA ESPANOLA DE FINANCIACION Y CONTABILIDA, 2021, 50 (04): : 469 - 492
  • [25] The impact of audit committee effectiveness on audit fees and non-audit service fees: Evidence from Australia
    Ali, Muhammad Jahangir
    Singh, Rajbans Kaur Shingara
    Al-Akra, Mahmoud
    [J]. ACCOUNTING RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2018, 31 (02) : 174 - 191
  • [26] Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Quality: Evidence from the Korean Audit Market
    Behrend, Matthew J.
    Khan, Sarfraz
    Ko, Young Woo
    Park, Sung-Jin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2020, 19 (03) : 37 - 60
  • [27] Audit Market Concentration, Audit Fees, and Audit Quality: Evidence from China
    Huang, Ting-Chiao
    Chang, Hsihui
    Chiou, Jeng-Ren
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2016, 35 (02): : 121 - 145
  • [28] The relationship of internal auditors' characteristics with external auditors' reliance and its impact on audit efficiency: Empirical evidence from Indonesian government institutions
    Usman, Rudy
    Rohman, Abdul
    Ratmono, Dwi
    [J]. COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [29] Audit Committee's Effectiveness, Board of Commissioners' Composition and the Selection of External Auditors: Evidence from Indonesia
    Rebecca, Vania
    Adhariani, Desi
    [J]. EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT THROUGH VISION 2020, 2019, : 6391 - 6405
  • [30] Audit Partner Specialization and Audit Fees: Some Evidence from Sweden
    Zerni, Mikko
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2012, 29 (01) : 312 - +