A re-evaluation of the carbon isotopic composition of organic reference materials

被引:12
|
作者
Stalker, L
Bryce, AJ
Andrew, AS
机构
[1] CSIRO, N Ryde, NSW 1670, Australia
[2] CSIRO, N Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.orggeochem.2005.02.001
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
In 1983, Schoell et al. [Schoell, M., Faber, E., Coleman, M.L., 1983. Carbon and hydrogen isotopic compositions of the NBS 22 and NBS 21 stable isotope reference materials: an inter-laboratory comparison. Organic Geochemistry 5, 3-6] carried out an inter-laboratory comparison of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reference materials NBS 21 (a graphite) and NBS 22 (an oil). At that time they found that NBS 22 in particular to be more depleted in C-13 than the values published by the IAEA at that time (i.e., delta C-13 of -29.81 parts per thousand PDB +/- 0.06 as opposed to delta C-13 of -29.4 parts per thousand PDB). Even so, to this day, the IAEA has subsequently used a value of delta C-13 of -29.7 parts per thousand +/- 0.2 VPDB. Following the advent of the new IAEA VPDB scale, defined by NBS 19 (a carbonate), this laboratory at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Petroleum and Exploration and Mining Divisions in North Ryde, NSW, Australia found that a number of the reference materials depleted in 13C (especially "organic" type reference materials) to be more depleted in C-13 on the VPDB scale than expected. In particular, NBS 22 appears to be 0.25 parts per thousand more depleted in C-13 than generally accepted values compared with a suite of carbonate standards run together. We suggest that the NBS 22 and other "organic" reference materials have probably all been calibrated to NBS 21 or 22 and should now be redefined on the VPDB scale. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 834
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] BEGINNING OF RE-EVALUATION
    ARONSON, D
    JUDAISM, 1976, 25 (02) : 255 - 256
  • [42] GASTROSCOPY - A RE-EVALUATION
    STRUB, IH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1963, 40 (01): : 75 - &
  • [43] RE-EVALUATION OF AMNIOGRAPHY
    CATERINI, H
    SAMA, J
    IFFY, L
    HARRIGAN, J
    PELOSI, M
    TIKU, J
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1976, 47 (03): : 373 - 377
  • [44] RE-EVALUATION OF CHANDS
    TORIELLO, HV
    LINDSTROM, JA
    WATERMAN, DF
    BAUGHMAN, FA
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1979, 16 (04) : 316 - 317
  • [45] A RE-EVALUATION OF YPSILOSPORA
    EBOH, DO
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE BRITISH MYCOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1985, 85 (AUG): : 39 - 46
  • [46] QUICKENING - A RE-EVALUATION
    ODOWD, MJ
    ODOWD, TM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1985, 92 (10): : 1037 - 1039
  • [47] RE-EVALUATION OF DEGOBINEAU,A
    POLIAKOV, L
    ANNALES-ECONOMIES SOCIETES CIVILISATIONS, 1975, 30 (04): : 850 - 854
  • [48] THE GHETTO - A RE-EVALUATION
    ETZIONI, A
    SOCIAL FORCES, 1959, 37 (03) : 255 - 262
  • [49] HALLUCINOGENS, A RE-EVALUATION
    FISCHER, R
    PHARMACOLOGIST, 1974, 16 (02): : 237 - 237
  • [50] RE-EVALUATION OF CHOLANGIOGRAPHY
    DEMEULENAERE, L
    VANWAES, L
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1979, 24 (01) : 85 - 86