Evaluation of water quality of Coruh River Basin (Turkey) using some biotic indices

被引:1
|
作者
Baytasoglu, Hazel [1 ]
Gozler, Ahmet Mutlu [1 ]
机构
[1] Recep Tayyip Erdogan Univ, Fac Fisheries, TR-53100 Rize, Turkey
来源
SU URUNLERI DERGISI | 2021年 / 38卷 / 04期
关键词
Biotic indexes; Coruh River; macroinvertebrates; water quality; BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES; RUNNING-WATER; STREAMS; BMWP; POLLUTION; ISPARTA;
D O I
10.12714/egejfas.38.4.01
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the water quality of the Coruh Basin using BMWP (Biological Monitoring Working Party) index, ASPT (Average Score Per Taxon) index, Shannon-Wiener Diversity Index, EPT (Ephemeroptera Plecoptera Trichoptera taxa), EP (Ephemeroptera Plecoptera taxa) index scores and benthic macroinvertebrates. The benthic macroinvertebrates were collected from 54 stations at the Coruh basin between 2014-2016 years. Standard hand net (D-frame net) and Ekman-Birge grab were used as sampling tools. As a result of the diagnoses, a total of 7246 individuals belonging to Insecta, Crustacea, Mollusca, Oligochaeta and Plathyhelminthes were obtained. It was determined that the most dominant group was Insecta and the rarest group was Plathyhelminthes. It was observed that the BMWP score ranged between 5 and 94, and the lowest and highest number of families detected in the stations were 1 and 18, respectively. It was determined that the Shannon Wiener diversity index value was between 0.54-2.20, therefore the basin streams generally showed moderate pollution. The results of BMWP index show that the basin streams had mostly show 3rd and 4th class water quality and also biodiversity decreases with the deterioration of the riverbed or exposure to pollution.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 409
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Water Quality Assessment of the Mudurnu River, Turkey, Using Biotic Indices
    Nurtac Ogleni
    Bayram Topal
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2011, 25
  • [2] Water Quality Assessment of the Mudurnu River, Turkey, Using Biotic Indices
    Ogleni, Nurtac
    Topal, Bayram
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2011, 25 (10) : 2487 - 2508
  • [3] Evaluation of surface water quality and heavy metal pollution of Coruh River Basin (Turkey) by multivariate statistical methods
    Bilgin, Ayla
    Konanc, Mustafa Umut
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2016, 75 (12)
  • [4] Evaluation of surface water quality and heavy metal pollution of Coruh River Basin (Turkey) by multivariate statistical methods
    Ayla Bilgin
    Mustafa Umut Konanç
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75
  • [5] An assessment of water quality in the Coruh Basin (Turkey) using multivariate statistical techniques
    Bilgin, Ayla
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2015, 187 (11)
  • [6] An assessment of water quality in the Coruh Basin (Turkey) using multivariate statistical techniques
    Ayla Bilgin
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2015, 187
  • [7] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BIOTIC INDICES FOR EVALUATION OF WATER QUALITY OF ESEN RIVER IN SOUTH-WEST ANATOLIA, TURKEY
    Yorulmaz, Bulent
    Sukatar, Atakan
    Barlas, Murat
    [J]. FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2015, 24 (1A): : 188 - 194
  • [8] DETERMINATION OF WATER QUALITY OF MUNZUR RIVER (TURKEY) BY USING MACROINVERTEBRATES, SOME PHYSICOCHEMICAL PARAMETER AND BIOTIC INDEX
    Kosal-Sahin, Serap
    Albayrak, Esra
    [J]. FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2018, 27 (04): : 2308 - 2311
  • [9] The use of macroinvertebrate based biotic indices and diversity indices to evaluate the water quality of Lepenci river basin in Kosovo
    Etemi, Ferdije Zhushi
    Bytyci, Pajtim
    Ismaili, Murtezan
    Fetoshi, Osman
    Ymeri, Prespa
    Shala-Abazi, Albona
    Muja-Bajraktari, Nesade
    Czikkely, Marton
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 55 (06): : 748 - 758
  • [10] Development of hydropower energy in Turkey: The case of Coruh river basin
    Akpinar, Adem
    Komurcu, Murat Ihsan
    Kankal, Murat
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (02): : 1201 - 1209