The effects of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine on maternal hemodynamic changes post spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery: A prospective cohort study

被引:7
|
作者
Helill, Shamill Eanga [1 ]
Sahile, Wossenyeleh Admasu [2 ]
Abdo, Ritbano Ahmed [3 ]
Wolde, Getahun Dendir [4 ]
Halil, Hassen Mosa [3 ]
机构
[1] Wachemo Univ, Dept Anesthesia, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Hossana, Ethiopia
[2] Addis Ababa Univ Addis, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[3] Wachemo Univ, Dept Midwifery, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Hossana, Ethiopia
[4] Wolaita Sodo Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia, Wolaita, Ethiopia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2019年 / 14卷 / 12期
关键词
INTRATHECAL BUPIVACAINE; RISK-FACTORS; HYPOTENSION; BARICITY; SECTION; SPREAD;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0226030
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Spinal anesthesia is a form of regional anesthesia frequently used in various lower abdominal, orthopedic, obstetric operations such as a cesarean delivery. The most common local anesthetic used for spinal anesthesia in obstetric and non-obstetric surgery is bupivacaine which can be utilized as an isobaric or hyperbaric solution, producing differences in maternal hemodynamic changes. Against this backdrop, the study aims to compare the effects of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine on maternal hemodynamic alterations after administering spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery at Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Methods A hospital-based prospective cohort study design was employed for the period December 1, 2017 to January 30, 2018. A total of 100 parturient were involved, with one group exposed to isobaric bupivacaine and the other to hyperbaric bupivacaine to observe their effects on maternal hemodynamic changes post spinal anesthesia. The participants were selected through systematic random sampling. Data analysis was performed using SPSS (version 20) through descriptive statistic, independent sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Fisher's exact test, and Chi-square test were used. P values of < 0.05 was assumed as statistically significant for all tests. Results The incidence of hypotension was found to be greater in isobaric than hyperbaric groups (82% vs. 60% respectively; p = 0.015). No statistical significant differences were found in mean arterial pressure value at baseline, but, statistically significant changes were observed among the groups (p < 0.05) at all study timing after spinal anesthesia, except at 30th min. No statistically significant differences were seen in the mean heart rate variability after spinal anesthesia at all periods, except the 15th minute (p = 0.033). A greater rate of vasopressor was used in the isobaric group as compared to the hyperbaric group (36% vs. 14% respectively; p = 0.011). Conclusion Baricity is a significant factor in maternal hemodynamic changes in the parturient for elective cesarean section. Isobaric bupivacaine produces greater change in blood pressure and incidence of hypotension and entails a greater vasopressor requirement than hyperbaric bupivacaine after spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Is it hyperbaric or isobaric Bupivacaine?
    Ruchalla, Elke
    [J]. ANASTHESIOLOGIE INTENSIVMEDIZIN NOTFALLMEDIZIN SCHMERZTHERAPIE, 2018, 53 (04): : 230 - 230
  • [2] Effect of Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Section on Cerebral Blood Oxygenation Changes: Comparison of Hyperbaric and Isobaric Bupivacaine
    Kondo, Yuko
    Sakatani, Kaoru
    Hirose, Noriya
    Maeda, Takeshi
    Kato, Jitsu
    Ogawa, Setsuro
    Katayama, Yoichi
    [J]. OXYGEN TRANSPORT TO TISSUE XXXIV, 2013, 765 : 109 - 114
  • [3] The effects of hyperbaric or isobaric bupivacaine on bispectral index in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section
    Jabalameli, Mitra
    Hazegh, Nina
    Gholami, Saeed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 17 (02): : 176 - 181
  • [4] Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with either hyperbaric or isobaric bupivacaine and ropivacaine for elective cesarean section
    Gunaydin, B.
    Tan, E. Dumanlar
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2007, 106 (05) : B81 - B81
  • [5] Effects on hypotension incidence: hyperbaric, isobaric, and combinations of bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section
    Yurtlu, Bulent Serhan
    Hanci, Volkan
    Okyay, Rahsan Dilek
    Bostankolu, Selime Evrim
    Kayhan, Gulay Erdogan
    Hakimoglu, Sedat
    Ayoglu, Hilal
    Arikan, Inan Ilker
    Bayar, Ulku
    Turan, Isil Ozkocak
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 42 (02) : 307 - 313
  • [6] A comparative study of low doses of isobaric or hyperbaric bupivacaine for CSE anesthesia for elective cesarean section
    Cerda, SE
    Leyton, P
    Hidalgo, GA
    Allen, C
    Escobar, JA
    Parra, VM
    Cumsille, F
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 102 (05) : A14 - A14
  • [7] Effects of Hyperbaric and Isobaric Bupivacaine on Hemodynamic Profiles and Block Characteristics Among Parturients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Besha, Aschalew
    Zemedkun, Abebayehu
    Tadesse, Muhiddin
    Hailu, Seyoum
    Mossie, Addisu
    Shiferaw, Adanech
    Angasa, Dugo
    Adamu, Yayeh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2023, 16 : 3545 - 3558
  • [8] Hyperbaric Versus Plain Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery
    Sia, Alex Tiong Heng
    Tan, Kok Hian
    Sng, Ban Leong
    Lim, Yvonne
    Chan, Edwin S. Y.
    Siddiqui, Fahad Javaid
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2015, 120 (01): : 132 - 140
  • [9] HYPERBARIC VS ISOBARIC BUPIVACAINE FOR SUBARACHNOID ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN DELIVERY - DOES IT MAKE A DIFFERENCE
    PALMER, CM
    HAYS, RL
    VANMAREN, GA
    ALVES, DM
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 83 (3A) : A954 - A954
  • [10] Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: Dose-dependent effects of hyperbaric bupivacaine on maternal hemodynamics
    Van de Velde, M
    Van Schoubroeck, D
    Jani, J
    Teunkens, A
    Missant, C
    Deprest, J
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 103 (01): : 187 - 190