Comparison of two in vitro methods to evaluate the water resistance of sunscreens

被引：1
|
作者：
Cheignon, C. [1 ]
Couteau, C. [1 ]
Billon-Chabaud, A. [2 ]
Da Silva, E. Marques [1 ]
Paparis, E. [1 ]
Coiffard, L. J. M. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Nantes Atlantique Univ, Univ Nantes, LPiC,Fac Pharm, MMS,EA2160, F-44000 Nantes, France
[2] Nantes Atlantique Univ, Lab Pharm Galen, F-44000 Nantes, France
来源：
PHARMAZIE | 2012年 / 67卷 / 02期
关键词：
CARE PRODUCTS;
D O I：
10.1691/ph.2012.1048
中图分类号：
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号：
100701 ;
摘要：
For a long time, the water resistance of sunscreens has been determined in vivo, according to Colipa's (Comite de Liaison des Industries de la Parfumerie) procedure. This method is not so ethical as healthy volunteers are irradiated, and can be replaced by an in vitro method which is easy and quick to perform. The objective of this work was to correlate the experimental device proposed by Choquenet et al. and the dissolutest (Sotax (R) AT6). This equipment is used in the pharmaceutical industry to control the tablets. The experimental conditions have been fixed to correlate the results obtained with both methods. The stirring speed for the dissolutest was fixed at 75 rpm, which is the speed value recommended by the European Pharmacopeia to study the dissolution over time of tablets.
引用
收藏
页码：116 / 119
页数：4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In vitro Efficacy of Photoprotection in Sunscreens: a Comparison Between Methods
    Polonini, Hudson C.
    Gomes, Tiago B. B.
    Goncalves, Karla M.
    Brandao, Marcos A. F.
    Raposo, Nadia R. B.
    LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY, 2012, 31 (03): : 353 - 361
  • [2] Development of an in vitro test to determine the water-resistance of sunscreens
    Choquenet, B.
    Couteau, C.
    Paparis, E.
    Coiffard, L. J. M.
    PHARMAZIE, 2008, 63 (07): : 525 - 527
  • [3] A comparison of methods to evaluate in vitro intestinal digestibility
    Ross, D. A.
    McCullouch, M. M.
    Van Amburgh, M. E.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 : 164 - 164
  • [4] Comparison of two methods to evaluate quantitative resistance to eastern filbert blight in European hazelnut
    Coyne, CJ
    Mehlenbacher, SA
    Johnson, KB
    Pinkerton, JN
    Smith, DC
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2000, 125 (05) : 603 - 608
  • [5] Water resistance and extended wear sunscreens
    Agin, PP
    DERMATOLOGIC CLINICS, 2006, 24 (01) : 75 - +
  • [6] Comparison of two in vitro methods for the detection of ivermectin resistance in Haemonchus contortus in sheep
    Dolinska, M. Urda
    Koenigova, A.
    Babjak, M.
    Varady, M.
    HELMINTHOLOGIA, 2016, 53 (02) : 120 - 125
  • [7] Comparison of two sensory and two instrumental methods to evaluate cookie color
    Kane, AM
    Lyon, BG
    Swanson, RB
    Savage, EM
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 2003, 68 (05) : 1831 - 1837
  • [8] An in vitro comparison between two methods of electrical resistance measurement for occlusal caries detection
    Kühnisch, J
    Heinrich-Weltzien, R
    Tabatabaie, M
    Stösser, L
    Huysmans, MCDNJM
    CARIES RESEARCH, 2006, 40 (02) : 104 - 111
  • [9] Two convenient methods to evaluate soybean for resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
    Chen, Y
    Wang, D
    PLANT DISEASE, 2005, 89 (12) : 1268 - 1272
  • [10] In vitro water resistance testing using SPF simulation based on spectroscopic analysis of rinsed sunscreens
    Sohn, M.
    Malburet, C.
    Caliskan, G.
    Buechse, A.
    Grumelard, J.
    Chambert, M.
    Herzog, B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE, 2018, 40 (03) : 217 - 225
12345