Monitoring maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity: A systematic review of global practices

被引:28
|
作者
England, Natalie [1 ]
Madill, Julia [1 ]
Metcalfe, Amy [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Magee, Laura [4 ]
Cooper, Stephanie [2 ]
Salmon, Charleen [3 ,5 ]
Adhikari, Kamala [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Kings Coll London, London, England
[5] Univ Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 05期
关键词
CANADA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0233697
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
There is international interest in monitoring severe events in the obstetrical population, commonly referred to as maternal near miss or severe maternal morbidity. These events can have significant consequences for individuals in this population and further study can inform practices to reduce both maternal morbidity and mortality. Numerous surveillance systems exist but we lack a standardized approach. Given the current inconsistencies and the importance in monitoring these events, this study aimed to identify and compare commonly used surveillance methods. In June 2018, we systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL using terms related to monitoring/surveillance and maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity. We included papers that used at least three indicators to monitor for these events and collected data on specific surveillance methods. We calculated the rate of maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity in hospitalization data obtained from the 2016 US National Inpatient Sample using five common surveillance methods. Of 18,832 abstracts, 178 papers were included in our review. 198 indicators were used in studies included in our review; 71.2% (n = 141) of these were used in <10% of included studies and only 6.1% (n = 12) were used in >50% of studies included in our review. Eclampsia was the only indicator that was assessed in >80% of included studies. The rate of these events in American hospitalization data varied depending on the criteria used, ranging from 5.07% (95% CI = 5.02, 5.11) with the Centers for Disease Control criteria and 7.85% (95% CI = 7.79, 7.91) using the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Our review highlights inconsistencies in monitoring practices within and between developed and developing countries. Given the wide variation in monitoring approaches observed and the likely contributing factors for these differences, it may be more feasible for clinical and academic efforts to focus on standardizing approaches in developed and developing countries independently at this time.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Maternal near miss review: A way forward
    Purandare C.N.
    [J]. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2013, 63 (4) : 213 - 215
  • [32] Severe maternal morbidity and near miss due to postpartum hemorrhage in a national multicenter surveillance study
    Rocha Filho, Edilberto A.
    Costa, Maria L.
    Cecatti, Jose G.
    Parpinelli, Mary A.
    Haddad, Samira M.
    Pacagnella, Rodolfo C.
    Sousa, Maria H.
    Melo, Elias F., Jr.
    Surita, Fernanda G.
    Souza, Joao P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2015, 128 (02) : 131 - 136
  • [33] Severe Acute Maternal Morbidity (Near Miss) in a Tertiary Care Center in Maharashtra: A Prospective Study
    Patankar, Alka
    Uikey, Prashant
    Rawlani, Neha
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2016, 4 (01) : 134 - 140
  • [34] Obesity as an independent risk factor for severe maternal morbidity ("near miss") during delivery hospitalization
    Lipkind, Heather
    Campbell, Katherine
    Savitz, David
    Danilack, Valery
    Goldshore, Matthew
    Werner, Erika
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S281 - S281
  • [35] Severe maternal morbidity: screening and review
    Kilpatrick, Sarah K.
    Ecker, Jeffrey L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 215 (03) : B17 - +
  • [36] Severe Maternal Morbidity: Screening and Review
    Kilpatrick, Sarah K.
    Ecker, Jeffrey L.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 128 (03): : E54 - E59
  • [37] Preventability Review of Severe Maternal Morbidity
    不详
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2019, 74 (09) : 512 - 514
  • [38] Preventability review of severe maternal morbidity
    Lawton, Beverley A.
    MacDonald, E. Jane
    Stanley, James
    Daniells, Karen
    Geller, Stacie E.
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (04) : 515 - 522
  • [39] A global view of severe maternal morbidity: moving beyond maternal mortality
    Geller, Stacie E.
    Koch, Abigail R.
    Garland, Caitlin E.
    MacDonald, E. Jane
    Storey, Francesca
    Lawton, Beverley
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2018, 15
  • [40] A global view of severe maternal morbidity: moving beyond maternal mortality
    Stacie E. Geller
    Abigail R. Koch
    Caitlin E. Garland
    E. Jane MacDonald
    Francesca Storey
    Beverley Lawton
    [J]. Reproductive Health, 15