A Fuzzy Linguistic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Assess Emergency Suppliers

被引:6
|
作者
Li, Huilin [1 ]
Yang, Jiaqi [1 ]
Xiang, Ziquan [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ Technol, Sch Transportat & Logist Engn, Wuhan 430063, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
emergency supplies; multi-criteria decision making; fuzzy set; actor analysis method; linguistic variables; SELECTION; MODEL; ENTROPY; RISK; CRITERIA; WEIGHT; SWARA;
D O I
10.3390/su142013114
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Under the influence of COVID-19, various emergency supplies have repeatedly broken links, seriously affecting normal life and hindering the sustainable development of enterprises and society. Therefore, suitable emergency suppliers are crucial. To prioritize and select suitable emergency suppliers, key indicators were determined, and evaluation models were established based on the characteristics of epidemic situations and epidemic prevention materials. The application of the MCDM (multi-criteria decision-making) issue combining fuzzy SWARA (the stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis) and the actor analysis method to emergency supplier selection studies, called the fuzzy SWARA-based actor analysis method, is used to identify appropriate suppliers for optimizing pre-preparation. Results of evaluation system weight computations by the Fuzzy SWARA-based actor analysis method show that the overall prioritization of four non-economic factors in ranking orders are "Delivery Capacity", "Flexible Supply Capacity", "Quality", and "Social Evaluation and Reputation". For the inclusion of conflicting standards and the unquantifiable feature, economic and non-economic factors were discussed separately and evaluated by language variables. Additionally, the fuzzy actor analysis indicated that economic factors and non-economic factors need to be considered comprehensively for emergency supplier selection. This method has good operability and reference value, convenient for the final choice making according to actual situation.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Linguistic Neutrosophic Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Approach with EDAS Method
    Li, Ying-ying
    Wang, Jian-qiang
    Wang, Tie-li
    [J]. ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 44 (03) : 2737 - 2749
  • [22] Multi-criteria decision making with fuzzy linguistic preference relations
    Chen, Ying-Hsiu
    Wang, Tien-Chin
    Wu, Chao-Yen
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2011, 35 (03) : 1322 - 1330
  • [23] An extension of fuzzy decision maps for multi-criteria decision-making
    Elomda, Basem Mohamed
    Hefny, Hesham Ahmed
    Hassan, Hesham Ahmed
    [J]. EGYPTIAN INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2013, 14 (02) : 147 - 155
  • [24] Utilization of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Emergency Management
    Caylor, Justine P.
    Hammel, Robert J., II
    [J]. COMPUTACION Y SISTEMAS, 2021, 25 (04): : 863 - 872
  • [25] Linguistic hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method based on evidential reasoning
    Zhou, Huan
    Wang, Jian-qiang
    Zhang, Hong-yu
    Chen, Xiao-hong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 2016, 47 (02) : 314 - 327
  • [26] Fuzzy α-discounting method for multi-criteria decision-making
    Karaman, Atilla
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERS, 2015, 38 (07) : 855 - 865
  • [27] A multi-criteria decision-making based approach to assess the sustainability of concrete structures
    de la Fuente, Albert
    Fernandez-Ordonez, David
    [J]. FIB CONFERENCE: SUSTAINABLE CONCRETE: MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2018, 2018, 442
  • [28] FUZZY-SETS AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    TONG, RM
    [J]. HUMAN SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 1982, 3 (04): : 266 - 268
  • [29] Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making in the assignment problem
    DrorRein, E
    Mitchell, HB
    [J]. SIGNAL AND DATA PROCESSING OF SMALL TARGETS 1997, 1997, 3163 : 525 - 534
  • [30] A Multi-criteria Decision-making Model for Evaluating Suppliers in Green SCM
    Jiang, W.
    Huang, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, 2018, 13 (03) : 337 - 352