Assessing psychological and supportive care needs in glioma patients - feasibility study on the use of the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form (SCNS-SF34-G) and the Supportive Care Needs Survey Screening Tool (SCNS-ST9) in clinical practice

被引:23
|
作者
Renovanz, M. [1 ]
Hickmann, A. -K. [2 ,3 ]
Coburger, J. [4 ]
Kohlmann, K. [1 ]
Janko, M. [1 ]
Reuter, A. -K. [1 ]
Keric, N. [1 ]
Nadji-Ohl, M. [3 ]
Koenig, J. [5 ]
Singer, S. [5 ,6 ]
Giese, A. [1 ]
Hechtner, M. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Mainz, Germany
[2] Hirslanden, Ctr Endoscop & Minimally Invas Neurosurg, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Katharinen Hosp, Klinikum Stuttgart, Dept Neurosurg, Stuttgart, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Ulm, Germany
[5] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med Ctr, Inst Med Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Div Epidemiol & Hlth Serv Res, Mainz, Germany
[6] German Canc Consortium DKTK, Mainz, Germany
[7] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
glioma; needs assessment; questionnaire; supportive care needs; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PALLIATIVE CARE; PSYCHOMETRIC VALIDATION; PRIMARY BRAIN; DISTRESS; QUESTIONNAIRE; IMPLEMENTATION; INSTRUMENT; PREDICTORS; CAREGIVERS;
D O I
10.1111/ecc.12598
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Neuro-oncological patients experience high symptom and psychosocial burden. The aim was to test feasibility and practicability of the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form (SCNS-SF34-G) and the SCNS-Screening Tool (SCNS-ST9) to assess supportive care needs of neuro-oncological patients in clinical routine. A total of 173 patients, most with a primary diagnosis of high-grade glioma (81%), were assessed first using SCNS-SF34-G in comparison to two well-established patient-reported outcome measures, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30 + QLQ-BN20) and Distress Thermometer (DT). In a follow-up assessment, SCNS-ST9 was used in a subgroup (n = 90). Questionnaires were completed either with personal guidance offered (group A) or by patients alone (group B). Feasibility was compared between instruments and groups for possible associations with patient and treatment-related factors. Missing values occurred in similar frequencies in all instruments. Errors in completion occurred in SCNS-SF34-G in 20% and in SCNS-ST9 in 16%; difficulties in completion were observed more often in SCNS-SF34-G and SCNS-ST9 (39%) compared to DT and EORTC (13%, p < .001). Distress was found to be associated with difficulties in completion of SCNS (OR 1.4, [95% CI 1.1-1.9], p = .013). SCNS-SF34 and SCNS-ST9 are suitable tools for glioma patients as long as personal guidance is offered.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Psychometric Assessment of the Chinese Version of the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short-Form (SCNS-SF34-C) among Hong Kong and Taiwanese Chinese Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Li, Wylie Wai Yee
    Lam, Wendy Wing Tak
    Shun, Shiow-Ching
    Lai, Yeur-Hur
    Law, Wai-Lun
    Poon, Jensen
    Fielding, Richard
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (10):
  • [32] Psychometric evaluation of the German Version of the Supportive Care Needs Survey for Partners and Caregivers (SCNS-P&C-G) of cancer patients
    Sklenarova, H.
    Haun, M. W.
    Kruempelmann, A.
    Friederich, H. -C.
    Huber, J.
    Thomas, M.
    Winkler, E. C.
    Girgis, A.
    Dinkel, A.
    Herzog, W.
    Hartmann, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2015, 24 (06) : 884 - 897
  • [33] Psychometric validation of the Turkish version of the Supportive Care Needs Survey for Partners and Caregivers (SCNS-P&C-T) of cancer patients
    Ergen, Mevluede
    Arikan, Fatma
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2020, 29 (01)
  • [34] Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish Adaptation of the Supportive Care Needs Survey-Short Form
    Avci, Ilknur Aydin
    Kumcagiz, Hatice
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2018, 26 (01) : E16 - E27
  • [35] Validation of the 34-item Supportive Care Needs Survey and 8-item Breast module French versions (SCNS-SF34-Fr and SCNS-BR8-Fr) in breast cancer patients
    Bredart, A.
    Kop, J. -L.
    Griesser, A. -C.
    Zaman, K.
    Panes-Ruedin, B.
    Jeanneret, W.
    Delaloye, J. -F.
    Zimmers, S.
    Jacob, A.
    Berthet, V.
    Fiszer, C.
    Dolbeault, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2012, 21 (04) : 450 - 459
  • [36] Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey - short form 34 among cancer patients in Ethiopia
    Tsion Afework
    Abigiya Wondimagegnehu
    Natnael Alemayehu
    Eva Johanna Kantelhardt
    Adamu Addissie
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 21
  • [37] The next generation of the supportive care needs survey: a brief screening tool for administration in the clinical oncology setting
    Girgis, Afaf
    Stojanovski, Elizabeth
    Boyes, Allison
    King, Madeleine
    Lecathelinais, Christophe
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2012, 21 (08) : 827 - 835
  • [38] Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the supportive care needs survey for caregivers of children with Paediatric cancer (SCNS-C-Ped-C)
    Wang, Jingting
    Bi, Xuanyi
    Zhang, Shuyi
    Wang, Yingwen
    Wu, Huifang
    Yang, Qi
    Ma, Linyu
    Yuan, Changrong
    [J]. NURSING OPEN, 2023, 10 (07): : 4196 - 4204
  • [39] Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of supportive care needs survey-short form 34 among cancer patients in Ethiopia
    Afework, Tsion
    Wondimagegnehu, Abigiya
    Alemayehu, Natnael
    Kantelhardt, Eva Johanna
    Addissie, Adamu
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [40] Validation of the Supportive Care Needs Survey-short form 34 with a simplified response format in men with prostate cancer
    Schofield, Penelope
    Gough, Karla
    Lotfi-Jam, Kerryann
    Aranda, Sanchia
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2012, 21 (10) : 1107 - 1112