Assessing psychological and supportive care needs in glioma patients - feasibility study on the use of the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form (SCNS-SF34-G) and the Supportive Care Needs Survey Screening Tool (SCNS-ST9) in clinical practice

被引:23
|
作者
Renovanz, M. [1 ]
Hickmann, A. -K. [2 ,3 ]
Coburger, J. [4 ]
Kohlmann, K. [1 ]
Janko, M. [1 ]
Reuter, A. -K. [1 ]
Keric, N. [1 ]
Nadji-Ohl, M. [3 ]
Koenig, J. [5 ]
Singer, S. [5 ,6 ]
Giese, A. [1 ]
Hechtner, M. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Mainz, Germany
[2] Hirslanden, Ctr Endoscop & Minimally Invas Neurosurg, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Katharinen Hosp, Klinikum Stuttgart, Dept Neurosurg, Stuttgart, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Ulm, Germany
[5] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med Ctr, Inst Med Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Div Epidemiol & Hlth Serv Res, Mainz, Germany
[6] German Canc Consortium DKTK, Mainz, Germany
[7] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
glioma; needs assessment; questionnaire; supportive care needs; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PALLIATIVE CARE; PSYCHOMETRIC VALIDATION; PRIMARY BRAIN; DISTRESS; QUESTIONNAIRE; IMPLEMENTATION; INSTRUMENT; PREDICTORS; CAREGIVERS;
D O I
10.1111/ecc.12598
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Neuro-oncological patients experience high symptom and psychosocial burden. The aim was to test feasibility and practicability of the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form (SCNS-SF34-G) and the SCNS-Screening Tool (SCNS-ST9) to assess supportive care needs of neuro-oncological patients in clinical routine. A total of 173 patients, most with a primary diagnosis of high-grade glioma (81%), were assessed first using SCNS-SF34-G in comparison to two well-established patient-reported outcome measures, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30 + QLQ-BN20) and Distress Thermometer (DT). In a follow-up assessment, SCNS-ST9 was used in a subgroup (n = 90). Questionnaires were completed either with personal guidance offered (group A) or by patients alone (group B). Feasibility was compared between instruments and groups for possible associations with patient and treatment-related factors. Missing values occurred in similar frequencies in all instruments. Errors in completion occurred in SCNS-SF34-G in 20% and in SCNS-ST9 in 16%; difficulties in completion were observed more often in SCNS-SF34-G and SCNS-ST9 (39%) compared to DT and EORTC (13%, p < .001). Distress was found to be associated with difficulties in completion of SCNS (OR 1.4, [95% CI 1.1-1.9], p = .013). SCNS-SF34 and SCNS-ST9 are suitable tools for glioma patients as long as personal guidance is offered.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychometric properties of the German version of the Short-Form Supportive Care Needs Survey Questionnaire (SCNS-SF34-G)
    Claudia Lehmann
    Uwe Koch
    Anja Mehnert
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2012, 20 : 2415 - 2424
  • [2] Psychometric properties of the German version of the Short-Form Supportive Care Needs Survey Questionnaire (SCNS-SF34-G)
    Lehmann, Claudia
    Koch, Uwe
    Mehnert, Anja
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2012, 20 (10) : 2415 - 2424
  • [3] Translation of Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form 34 (SCNS-SF34) into Italian and cultural validation study
    Anita Zeneli
    Elisa Fabbri
    Elena Donati
    Grainne Tierney
    Stefania Pasa
    Maria Alejandra Berardi
    Marco Maltoni
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016, 24 : 843 - 848
  • [4] Identification of supportive care needs in a sample of Puerto Rican cancer patients with the Supportive Care Needs Survey-34 (SCNS-34)
    Gonzalez, V.
    Velez, M.
    Pedro, E.
    Cruz, C.
    Cotto, M.
    Colon, M.
    Romaguera, J.
    Chevere-Mourino, C.
    Delgado-Mateu, L. A.
    Tirado-Gomez, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (15)
  • [5] Translation of Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form 34 (SCNS-SF34) into Italian and cultural validation study
    Zeneli, Anita
    Fabbri, Elisa
    Donati, Elena
    Tierney, Grainne
    Pasa, Stefania
    Berardi, Maria Alejandra
    Maltoni, Marco
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2016, 24 (02) : 843 - 848
  • [6] Reliability and validity of the mandarin version of the supportive care needs survey short-form (SCNS-SF34) and the head and neck cancer-specific supportive care needs (SCNS-HNC) module
    Jianxia Lyu
    Li Yin
    Ping Cheng
    Bin Li
    Shanshan Peng
    Chunlian Yang
    Jing Yang
    Haixin Liang
    Qinghua Jiang
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [7] Reliability and Validity of the Arabic Version of the Short Form Supportive Care Needs Survey Questionnaire (SCNS-SF34-A)
    Abdelrahman, Hanan
    Al Qadire, Mohammad
    Zehry, Hamada
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2024, 40 (03)
  • [8] Reliability and validity of the mandarin version of the supportive care needs survey short-form (SCNS-SF34) and the head and neck cancer-specific supportive care needs (SCNS-HNC) module
    Lyu, Jianxia
    Yin, Li
    Cheng, Ping
    Li, Bin
    Peng, Shanshan
    Yang, Chunlian
    Yang, Jing
    Liang, Haixin
    Jiang, Qinghua
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [9] Implementing the Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS) Through a Stepped Care Approach
    Sumra, Saffanat
    Kosoff, Alexander
    Yaqubi, Sabreen
    Pham, Rachel
    Kaur, Gurleen
    Nesheiwat, Samantha
    Gunawan, Michelle
    Reyes, Danielle
    Martin, Joshua
    Belkora, Jeff
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2024, 33
  • [10] Reliability and validity of the short-form supportive care needs survey - Japanese version (SCNS-SF34-J)
    Okuyama, Toru
    Akechi, Tatsuo
    Yamashita, Keiko
    Toyama, Tatsuya
    Endo, Chiharu
    Sagawa, Ryuichi
    Uchida, Megumi
    Furukawa, Toshiaki
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2008, 17 : S203 - S203