Double reading of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer detection

被引:42
|
作者
Rotili, Anna [1 ]
Trimboli, Rubina Manuela [2 ]
Penco, Silvia [1 ]
Pesapane, Filippo [1 ,3 ]
Tantrige, Priyan [4 ]
Cassano, Enrico [1 ]
Sardanelli, Francesco [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] European Inst Oncol IRCCS, IEO, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti, 435, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept BioMed Sci Hlth, Via Morandi 30, I-20097 Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Milan, Postgraduat Sch Radiodiagnost, Via Festa Perdono 7, I-20122 Milan, Italy
[4] Kings Coll Hosp London, Unit Radiol, Denmark Hill, London, Brixton, England
[5] Unit Radiol, IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Via Morandi 30, I-20097 Milan, Italy
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Early detection of cancer; Observer variation; Sensitivity and specificity; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER COHORT; FAMILIAL RISK; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; DUCTAL CARCINOMA; IN-SITU; MRI; WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; LESIONS; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-019-05519-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To estimate the performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for breast cancer detection. Methods Consecutive breast magnetic resonance imaging examinations performed from January to September 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Examinations performed before/after neoadjuvant therapy, lacking DWI sequences or reference standard were excluded; breasts after mastectomy were also excluded. Two experienced breast radiologists (R1, R2) independently evaluated only DWI. Final pathology or > 1-year follow-up served as reference standard. Mc Nemar, chi(2), and kappa statistics were applied. Results Of 1,131 examinations, 672 (59.4%) lacked DWI sequence, 41 (3.6%) had no reference standard, 30 (2.7%) were performed before/after neoadjuvant therapy, and 10 (0.9%) had undergone bilateral mastectomy. Thus, 378 women aged 49 +/- 11 years (mean +/- standard deviation) were included, 51 (13%) with unilateral mastectomy, totaling 705 breasts. Per-breast cancer prevalence was 96/705 (13.6%). Per-breast sensitivity was 83/96 (87%, 95% confidence interval 78-93%) for both R1 and R2, 89/96 (93%, 86-97%) for double reading (DR) (p = 0.031); per-lesion DR sensitivity for cancers <= 10 mm was 22/31 (71%, 52-86%). Per-breast specificity was 562/609 (93%, 90-94%) for R1, 538/609 (88%, 86-91%) for R2, and 526/609 (86%, 83-89%) for DR (p < 0.001). Inter-observer agreement was substantial (kappa = 0.736). Acquisition time varied from 3:00 to 6:22 min:s. Per-patient median interpretation time was 46 s (R1) and 51 s (R2). Conclusions DR DWI showed a 93% sensitivity and 88% specificity, with 71% sensitivity for cancers <= 10 mm, pointing out a potential for DWI as stand-alone screening method.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 120
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in predicting the radiosensitivity of cervical cancer
    Ni, Xiaolei
    Tong, Yuanhe
    Xiao, Youping
    Liao, Jiang
    Chen, Yunbing
    Wang, Min
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (08): : 13836 - 13841
  • [22] Reproducibility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer
    Habrich, J.
    Fritz, V.
    Boeke, S.
    Nachbar, M.
    Nikolaou, K.
    Schick, F.
    Zips, D.
    Thorwarth, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S1551 - S1552
  • [23] Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer evaluation
    Rinaldi, D.
    Fiocchi, F.
    Ligabue, G.
    Bianchi, G.
    Torricelli, P.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2012, 117 (08): : 1429 - 1440
  • [24] Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in esophageal cancer
    Sakurada, Aine
    Takahara, Taro
    Kwee, Thomas C.
    Yamashita, Tomohiro
    Nasu, Seiji
    Horie, Tomohiko
    Van Cauteren, Marc
    Imai, Yutaka
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (06) : 1461 - 1469
  • [25] Perfusion effects in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of rectal cancer
    Nordenstam, J.
    Rothenberger, D.
    Madoff, R.
    Wikstrom, J.
    Jessurun, J.
    Garwood, M.
    Mellgren, A.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008, 51 (05) : 745 - 745
  • [26] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Cancer Biomarker: Consensus and Recommendations
    不详
    NEOPLASIA, 2009, 11 (02): : 102 - 125
  • [27] Usefulness of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Wu, Lian-Ming
    Xu, Jian-Rong
    Gu, Hai-Yan
    Hua, Jia
    Chen, Jie
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhu, Jiong
    Ye, Yong-Quan
    Hu, Jiani
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2012, 19 (10) : 1215 - 1224
  • [28] FEASIBILITY OF DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN DIAGNOSIS OF BLADDER CANCER
    Kobayashi, S.
    Yoshida, S.
    Koga, F.
    Ishii, C.
    Tanaka, H.
    Komai, Y.
    Saito, K.
    Masuda, H.
    Fujii, Y.
    Kawakami, S.
    Kihara, K.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 9 (02) : 48 - 48
  • [29] Clinical utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer
    Afaq, Asim
    Koh, Dow-Mu
    Padhani, Anwar
    van As, Nicholas
    Sohaib, S. Aslam
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (11) : 1716 - 1722
  • [30] Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in detection of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer
    Shimy, Rehab Mohamed
    Aly, Asmaa Monir
    Elshishtawy, Samer Ali
    Hassan, Mona H.
    Desouky, Shimaa H. I.
    Hanna, Amir
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 55 (01):