THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION IN TREATMENT-RESISTANT BIPOLAR DEPRESSION

被引:10
|
作者
Zengin, Gulizar [1 ]
Topak, Osman Zulkif [1 ]
Atesci, Oyku [2 ]
Atesci, Figen Culha [1 ]
机构
[1] Pamukkale Univ, Dept Psychiat, Knukh Campus Pamukkale, Denizli, Turkey
[2] Acibadem Univ, Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
bipolar depression; treatment resistant; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; DOUBLE-BLIND; MAJOR DEPRESSION; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; TMS TREATMENT; ADD-ON; DISORDER; DURATION; THERAPY; RTMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Backround: The aim of the current study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment, a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, on depressive symptoms in treatment-resistant bipolar depression (TRBD). Subjects and methods: The study included 29 patients between the ages of 18-65, with bipolar disorder depressive episode according to DSM-5 and with the decision of non-response to treatment according to the Canadian Mood and Anxiety Treatment Network (CANMAT). Patients were divided into two groups double-blind-randomly, 20 sessions of TMS and 20 sessions of sham TMS were applied crossover. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and TMS Side Effect Questionnaire were applied to the patients before the treatment, at the 2nd week which is the crossover phase, and at the end of the treatment at 4th week. Results: In both groups, the severity of depression was decreased significantly according to HAM-D and BDI scores after the procedure. As well as active stimulation, some positive placebo effects were observed with sham stimulation. But the decreases seen in HAM-D and BDI scores and response to the treatment were higher during the weeks when the groups received active stimulation (respectively p=0.000, p=0.001, p=0.005). At the end of the study, according to HAM-D, 55.7% of the patients showed response to the treatment, 24.13% partial response. According to BDI, 41.37% of the patients showed response to the treatment, and 31.03% partial response. No associations were found between TMS response and sociodemographic - clinical features, or type of the disease (p>0.05). During the study, no serious adverse effects such as seizures or manic / hypomanic switches were observed. Conclusions: The results of our study showed that TMS treatment is an effective and safe treatment for patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 244
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION REINTRODUCTION TO MAINTAIN CLINICAL BENEFIT FOR ADOLESCENTS WITH TREATMENT-RESISTANT DEPRESSION
    Garzon, Juan Felipe
    Elmaadawi, Ahmed Z.
    Aaronson, Scott T.
    Schrodt, Randy
    Holbert, Richard C.
    Zuckerman, Seth
    Demitrack, Mark A.
    Strawn, Jeffrey R.
    Croarkin, Paul E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 62 (10): : S319 - S319
  • [42] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is clinically effective in treatment-resistant major depression
    Avery, DH
    Fawaz, W
    Holtzheimer, PE
    Russo, J
    Neumaier, J
    Claypoole, K
    Haynor, D
    Roy-Byrne, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 7 : S354 - S354
  • [43] A pilot investigation of accelerated deep transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols in treatment-resistant depression
    Igor Filipčić
    Ivona Šimunović Filipčić
    Strahimir Sučić
    Željko Milovac
    Natko Gereš
    Katarina Matić
    Mirela Čelić-Ružić
    Sandra Zečević Penić
    Ivana Orgulan
    Vladimir Požgaj
    Žarko Bajić
    European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 2021, 271 : 49 - 59
  • [44] Treatment-resistant depression: experience of the first repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation clinic in the UK
    Euba, Rafael
    Panihhidina, Irina
    Zamar, Andy
    FUTURE NEUROLOGY, 2015, 10 (03) : 211 - 215
  • [45] Combining intensive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with neurofeedback in a case of treatment-resistant depression
    Bruno, Antonio
    Celebre, Laura
    Tagliavia, Gabriele
    Zoccali, Rocco Antonio
    Muscatello, Maria Rosaria Anna
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 63 (02) : 199 - +
  • [46] Prolonged transcranial magnetic stimulation in a pregnant patient with treatment-resistant depression: a case report
    Jawish, Rana
    Smid, Marcela
    Gordon, Adam
    Shangraw, Kathleen
    Mickey, Brian J.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL CASE REPORTS, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [47] Efficacy and safety of intermittent theta burst stimulation versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for patients with treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review
    Lan, Xian-Jun
    Yang, Xin-Hu
    Qin, Zhen-Juan
    Cai, Dong-Bin
    Liu, Qi-Man
    Mai, Jian-Xin
    Deng, Can-jin
    Huang, Xing-Bing
    Zheng, Wei
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 14
  • [48] Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: Efficacy, safety and mechanisms of action
    Anderson, Rodney J.
    Frye, Mark A.
    Abulseoud, Osama A.
    Lee, Kendall H.
    McGillivray, Jane A.
    Berk, Michael
    Tye, Susannah J.
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2012, 36 (08): : 1920 - 1933
  • [49] Role of Electroconvulsive Therapy, Ketamine Infusion, and Deep Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Treatment-Resistant Bipolar Depression: A Case Report
    Gao, Keming
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (06):
  • [50] Neuroanatomical correlates of therapeutic efficacy of low-frequency right prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant depression
    Kito, Shinsuke
    Hasegawa, Takashi
    Koga, Yoshihiko
    PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2011, 65 (02) : 175 - 182