The island species-area relationship: biology and statistics

被引:293
|
作者
Triantis, Kostas A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guilhaumon, Francois [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Whittaker, Robert J. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Biodivers Res Grp, Sch Geog & Environm, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
[2] Univ Acores, Azorean Biodivers Grp, Dept Ciencias Agr CITAA, P-9700042 Terceira, Acores, Portugal
[3] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Fac Biol, Dept Ecol & Taxon, GR-15784 Athens, Greece
[4] Univ Montpellier 2, UMR CNRS, UM2, IFREMER,IRD ECOSYM 5119, F-34095 Montpellier 5, France
[5] Univ Evora, Rui Nabeiro Biodivers Chair CIBIO, P-7000890 Evora, Portugal
[6] Univ Copenhagen, Ctr Macroecol Evolut & Climate, Dept Biol, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark
关键词
Asymptote; ecological law; efficiency; generality; island biogeography; island type; model selection; power law; scale; species diversity; SCALE-DEPENDENCE; VASCULAR PLANTS; RICHNESS; CURVES; MODEL; BIOGEOGRAPHY; DIVERSITY; DIVERSIFICATION; ACCUMULATION; EVOLUTIONARY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02652.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Aim We conducted the most extensive quantitative analysis yet undertaken of the form taken by the island speciesarea relationship (ISAR), among 20 models, to determine: (1) the best-fit model, (2) the best-fit model family, (3) the best-fit ISAR shape (and presence of an asymptote), (4) system properties that may explain ISAR form, and (5) parameter values and interpretation of the logarithmic implementation of the power model. Location World-wide. Methods We amassed 601 data sets from terrestrial islands and employed an information-theoretic framework to test for the best-fit ISAR model, family, and shape, and for the presence/absence of an asymptote. Two main criteria were applied: generality (the proportion of cases for which the model provided an adequate fit) and efficiency (the overall probability of a model, when adequate, being the best at explaining ISARs; evaluated using the mean overall AIC(c) weight). Multivariate analyses were used to explore the potential of island system properties to explain trends in ISAR form, and to describe variation in the parameters of the logarithmic power model. Results Adequate fits were obtained for 465 data sets. The simpler models performed best, with the power model ranked first. Similar results were obtained at model family level. The ISAR form is most commonly convex upwards, without an asymptote. Island system traits had low descriptive power in relation to variation in ISAR form. However, the z and c parameters of the logarithmic power model show significant pattern in relation to island system type and taxon. Main conclusions Over most scales of space, ISARs are best represented by the power model and other simple models. More complex, sigmoid models may be applicable when the spatial range exceeds three orders of magnitude. With respect to the log power model, z-values are indicative of the process(es) establishing species richness and composition patterns, while c-values are indicative of the realized carrying capacity of the system per unit area. Variation in ISAR form is biologically meaningful, but the signal is noisy, as multiple processes constrain the ecological space available within island systems and the relative importance of these processes varies with the spatial scale of the system.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 231
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ON ESTIMATING THE SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP - COMMENT
    EKBOHM, G
    RYDIN, H
    [J]. OIKOS, 1990, 57 (01) : 145 - 146
  • [22] Trophic rank and the species-area relationship
    Holt, RD
    Lawton, JH
    Polis, GA
    Martinez, ND
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1999, 80 (05) : 1495 - 1504
  • [23] Influence of elevation on the species-area relationship
    Moradi, Halime
    Fattorini, Simone
    Oldeland, Jens
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2020, 47 (09) : 2029 - 2041
  • [24] Species-area relationship and small-island effect of bryophytes on the Zhoushan Archipelago, China
    Yu, Jing
    Li, Dandan
    Zhang, Zeyou
    Guo, Shuiliang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2020, 47 (04) : 978 - 992
  • [25] Countryside Species-Area Relationship as a Valid Alternative to the Matrix-Calibrated Species-Area Model
    Pereira, Henrique Miguel
    Ziv, Guy
    Miranda, Murilo
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2014, 28 (03) : 874 - 876
  • [26] The species-area relationship in centipedes (Myriapoda: Chilopoda): a comparison between Mediterranean island groups
    Simaiakis, Stylianos Michail
    Tjorve, Even
    Gentile, Gabriele
    Minelli, Alessandro
    Mylonas, Moisis
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2012, 105 (01) : 146 - 159
  • [27] A STOCHASTIC-MODEL FOR THE SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP
    WISSEL, C
    MAIER, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 1992, 19 (04) : 355 - 362
  • [28] Are planar areas adequate for the species-area relationship?
    Fattorini, S.
    [J]. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2007, 74 (03) : 259 - 264
  • [29] Habitat heterogeneity overrides the species-area relationship
    Baldi, Andras
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2008, 35 (04) : 675 - 681
  • [30] The species-area relationship does not have an asymptote!
    Williamson, M
    Gaston, KJ
    Lonsdale, WM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2001, 28 (07) : 827 - 830