Do high performers always obtain supervisory career mentoring? The role of perspective-taking

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Zheng, Xiaotong [2 ]
Guan, Yanjun [2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Shuming [4 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Durham, Durham Univ Business Sch, Mill Hill Lane, Durham DH1 3LB, England
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong Shenzhen, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ, Sch Business, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
cost-benefit analysis; mentoring; perspective taking; social exchange; subordinate performance; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; PROTEGE SELECTION; SOCIAL-STATUS; GENDER; OUTCOMES; BENEFITS; OTHERS; CONSEQUENCES; ANTECEDENTS; ORIENTATION;
D O I
10.1111/joop.12386
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Drawing on social exchange theory, this study examines when and why high performers may fail to obtain supervisory career mentoring (SCM). Although high performance by proteges often makes SCM more efficient and successful, we argue that supervising mentors may be reluctant to offer SCM due to the victimization of high performers that has been shown by recent findings in the supervision literature. We further propose that high performers should be high in perspective-taking, a core relational competence and a key individual factor that moderates the relationship between protege performance and SCM. Findings from a multi-source multi-time survey (Study 1) and an online experiment (Study 2) consistently show that when high performers are low in perspective-taking, they are less likely to receive SCM. Moreover, the findings from Study 2 also show that low perspective-taking by high performers significantly reduces supervisors' expected benefits from mentoring them, which in turn leads to the supervisors having low willingness to mentor. Our research therefore highlights the importance of taking into account the interaction between task and relational competence in understanding how protege characteristics may influence SCM in organizational settings. The paper concludes with theoretical and practical implications. Practitioner points At workplace, employees tend to focus on improving their performance and task competence and believe that high performance can help them receive more resources to develop their career. However, if they cannot imagine oneself in another's shoes, high performance can lead to less positive results. High performers should take others' perspective to understand what others feel and think to reduce potential threats seen by the supervisor and their colleagues. Therefore, task and relational competence are equally important. Organizations can help their employees develop this perspective-taking, including creating more opportunities (e.g., informal social events or formal training) for employees and their supervisors to understand each other's work roles, perspectives and values, which can help employees to understand their supervisors' views and stand in their supervisors' shoes.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 357
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus
    Galinsky, AD
    Mussweiler, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (04) : 657 - 669
  • [22] Using Student Experiences to improve Student Experiences: Increasing the Quality of Mentoring Through Perspective-Taking
    Anderson, Monica
    Pettit, Christy
    [J]. IEEE STCBP RESPECT CONFERENCE: 2021 RESEARCH ON EQUITY AND SUSTAINED PARTICIPATION IN ENGINEERING, COMPUTING, AND TECHNOLOGY (RESPECT), 2021, : 253 - 254
  • [23] Mediating and perspective-taking manipulatives: Fostering dynamic perspective-taking by mediating dialogic thinking and bolstering empathy in role-play and reflection for microteaching
    Mochizuki, Toshio
    Sasaki, Hiroshi
    Wakimoto, Takehiro
    Kubota, Yoshihiko
    Eagan, Brendan
    Hirayama, Ryoya
    Yamaguchi, Yuta
    Yuki, Natsumi
    Funaoi, Hideo
    Suzuki, Hideyuki
    Kato, Hiroshi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, 2022, 17 (04) : 489 - 518
  • [24] Mediating and perspective-taking manipulatives: Fostering dynamic perspective-taking by mediating dialogic thinking and bolstering empathy in role-play and reflection for microteaching
    Toshio Mochizuki
    Hiroshi Sasaki
    Takehiro Wakimoto
    Yoshihiko Kubota
    Brendan Eagan
    Ryoya Hirayama
    Yuta Yamaguchi
    Natsumi Yuki
    Hideo Funaoi
    Hideyuki Suzuki
    Hiroshi Kato
    [J]. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2022, 17 : 489 - 518
  • [25] Is It Always Me First? Effects of Self-Tagging on Third-Person Perspective-Taking
    Mattan, Bradley
    Quinn, Kimberly A.
    Apperly, Ian A.
    Sui, Jie
    Rotshtein, Pia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2015, 41 (04) : 1100 - 1117
  • [26] SIBLING RELATIONS - THE ROLE OF CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVE-TAKING IN THE ONTOGENY OF SIBLING CAREGIVING
    STEWART, RB
    MARVIN, RS
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1984, 55 (04) : 1322 - 1332
  • [27] Can we forgive a militant outgroup member? The role of perspective-taking
    Noor, Masi
    Halabi, Samer
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 21 (04) : 246 - 255
  • [28] Religiosity and Psychotic Ideation in Stable Schizophrenia: A Role for Empathic Perspective-Taking
    Duno, Roso
    Carles Oliva, Joan
    Tobena, Adolf
    Palao, Diego
    Labad, Javier
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (02)
  • [29] Role of the Embodied Cognition Process in Perspective-Taking Ability During Childhood
    Hirai, Masahiro
    Muramatsu, Yukako
    Nakamura, Miho
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 91 (01) : 214 - 235
  • [30] THE ROLE OF PERSPECTIVE-TAKING ABILITY IN NEGOTIATING UNDER DIFFERENT FORMS OF ARBITRATION
    NEALE, MA
    BAZERMAN, MH
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1983, 36 (03): : 378 - 388