Marginal costs and co-benefits of energy efficiency investments - The case of the Swiss residential sector

被引:194
|
作者
Jakob, M [1 ]
机构
[1] ETH Zentrum, Swiss Fed Inst Technol, CEPE, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
marginal costs; energy efficiency; co-benefits;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.039
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Key elements of present investment decision-making regarding energy efficiency of new buildings and the refurbishment of existing buildings are the marginal costs of energy efficiency measures and incomplete knowledge of investors and architects about pricing, co-benefits and new technologies. This paper reports on a recently completed empirical study for the Swiss residential sector. It empirically quantifies the marginal costs of energy efficiency investments (i.e. additional insulation, improved window systems, ventilation and heating systems and architectural concepts). For the private sector, first results on the economic valuation of co-benefits such as improved comfort of living, improved indoor air quality, better protection against external noise, etc. may amount to the same order of magnitude as the energy-related benefits are given. The cost-benefit analysis includes newly developed technologies that show large variations in prices due to pioneer market pricing, add-on of learning costs and risk components of the installers. Based on new empirical data on the present cost-situation and past techno-economic progress, the potential of future cost reduction was estimated applying the experience curve concept. The paper shows, for the first time, co-benefits and cost dynamics of energy efficiency investments, of which decision makers in the real estate sector, politics and administrations are scarcely aware. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 187
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Co-benefits of reducing CO2 and air pollutant emissions in the urban transport sector: A case of Guangzhou
    Jiao, Jiandong
    Huang, Ying
    Liao, Cuiping
    [J]. ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 59 : 131 - 143
  • [32] Optimizing the co-benefits of biodiversity and carbon sinks in urban residential yards
    Ariluoma, Mari
    Kinnunen, Antti
    Lampinen, Jussi
    Hautamaki, Ranja
    Ottelin, Juudit
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE CITIES, 2024, 6
  • [33] The determinants of energy efficient retrofit investments in the English residential sector
    Trotta, Gianluca
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 120 : 175 - 182
  • [34] Ecosystem Services in Conservation Planning: Targeted Benefits vs. Co-Benefits or Costs?
    Chan, Kai M. A.
    Hoshizaki, Lara
    Klinkenberg, Brian
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (09):
  • [35] Welfare, development, and cost-efficiency: A global synthesis on incentivizing energy efficiency measures through co-benefits
    Chatterjee, Souran
    Rafa, Nazifa
    Nandy, Ananya
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 89
  • [36] Valuing co-benefits to make low-carbon investments in cities bankable: the case of waste and transportation projects
    Rashidi, Kaveh
    Stadelmann, Martin
    Patt, Anthony
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2017, 34 : 69 - 78
  • [37] Co-benefits of energy efficiency improvement and air pollution abatement in the Chinese iron and steel industry
    Zhang, Shaohui
    Worrell, Ernst
    Crijns-Graus, Wina
    Wagner, Fabian
    Cofala, Janusz
    [J]. ENERGY, 2014, 78 : 333 - 345
  • [38] Health co-benefits of climate change mitigation policies in the transport sector
    Shaw C.
    Hales S.
    Howden-Chapman P.
    Edwards R.
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4 (6) : 427 - 433
  • [39] Evaluating co-benefits of energy efficiency and air pollution abatement in China's cement industry
    Zhang, Shaohui
    Worrell, Ernst
    Crijns-Graus, Wina
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 147 : 192 - 213
  • [40] Health co-benefits of climate change mitigation policies in the transport sector
    Shaw, Caroline
    Hales, Simon
    Howden-Chapman, Philippa
    Edwards, Richard
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 4 (06) : 427 - 433