Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography better identifies pancreatic tumor vascularization than helical CT

被引:70
|
作者
D'Onofrio, M
Malagò, R
Zamboni, G
Vasori, S
Falconi, M
Capelli, P
Manuseto, G
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Policlin GB Rossi, Dept Radiol, I-37100 Verona, Italy
[2] Univ Verona, Policlin GB Rossi, Dept Surg, I-37100 Verona, Italy
[3] Univ Verona, Policlin GB Rossi, Dept Pathol, I-37100 Verona, Italy
关键词
pancreatic tumors; contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; helical computed tomography; angiogenesis; microvessel density;
D O I
10.1159/000086540
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is a recently introduced field of ultrasonography (US). To assess the ability of CEUS to identify the vascularization of solid pancreatic tumors in comparison to helical CT. Methods: Forty-two resected pancreatic tumors, found at US, were studied with CEUS and helical CT. The tumor enhancement at CEUS was scored in comparison to the baseline aspect of the lesion and/or the extralesional pancreatic parenchyma together with the adjacent vessels during the dynamic study. All the lesions underwent pathological examination using H&E stains and CD34 markers with an evaluation of the microvessel density (MVD). The correlation of CEUS and helical CT with the MVD of the lesions was established with Spearman's test. Results: The correlation of CEUS with the MVD of the lesions was significantly superior (Rs = 0.914; p < 0.0001) to that of helical CT (Rs = 0.635; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: CEUS is better than helical CT in the identification of the vascularization of solid pancreatic tumors. CEUS, when the pancreatic gland is optimally visualized, should be therefore considered a complementary imaging modality in the characterization of pancreatic tumors. CEUS can be a valid onco-imaging modality for quantifying tumoral vascularization in a noninvasive and accurate way. Copyright (C) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel and IAP.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 402
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of focal pancreatic masses:: comparison of mangafodipir-enhanced MR imaging and contrast-enhanced helical CT
    Schima, W
    Függer, R
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (12) : 2998 - 3008
  • [42] Expectations for contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
    Nakashima Kazutaka
    Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, 2019, 46 : 285 - 285
  • [43] Principle of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
    Mine, Yoshitaka
    Takada, Etsuo
    Sugimoto, Katsutoshi
    Moriyasu, Fuminori
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASONICS, 2024, 51 (04) : 567 - 580
  • [44] Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography
    Nischita K Reddy
    Ana Maria Ioncicǎ
    Adrian Sǎftoiu
    Peter Vilmann
    Manoop S Bhutani
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2011, 17 (01) : 42 - 48
  • [45] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography of the Pancreas
    Faccioli, Niccolo
    Crippa, Stefano
    Bassi, Claudio
    D'Onofrio, Mirko
    PANCREATOLOGY, 2009, 9 (05) : 560 - 566
  • [46] Expectations for contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
    Toshiko Hirai
    Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, 2014, 41 : 1 - 2
  • [47] Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the carotids
    Rafailidis, Vasileios
    Pitoulias, Georgios
    Kouskouras, Konstantinos
    Rafailidis, Dimitrios
    ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2015, 34 (04) : 312 - 323
  • [48] Expectations for contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
    Hirai, Toshiko
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASONICS, 2014, 41 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [49] Portal venous variations - Prevalence with contrast-enhanced helical CT
    Akgul, E
    Inal, M
    Soyupak, S
    Binokay, F
    Aksungur, E
    Oguz, M
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2002, 43 (03) : 315 - 319
  • [50] Hepatocellular carcinoma: Evaluation with biphasic, contrast-enhanced, helical CT
    Baron, RL
    Oliver, JH
    Dodd, GD
    Nalesnik, M
    Holbert, BL
    Carr, B
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (02) : 505 - 511