Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: Stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns

被引:276
|
作者
Young, AE
Wasiak, R
Roessler, RT
McPherson, KM
Anema, JR
van Poppel, MNM
机构
[1] Liberty Mutual Res Inst Safety, Ctr Disabil Res, Hopkinton, MA 01748 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Coll Educ & Hlth Profess, Rrehabil Human Resources & Commun Disorders Dept, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[3] Auckland Univ Technol, Div Rehabil & Occupat Studies, Ctr Phys Rehabil Res, Auckland, New Zealand
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Ctr Med, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, Inst Res Extramural Med, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
return to work; work disability; stakeholders; outcomes research; outcome measurement; employment outcomes;
D O I
10.1007/s10926-005-8033-0
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Introduction: Satisfaction with return-to-work (RTW) outcomes is dependent on many factors, including a clear exposition of what people define as a "good outcome" and the information they use to determine if such an outcome has been achieved. This paper defines the key stakeholders involved in the RTW process and discusses the need to understand their motivations, interests, and concerns. Methods:A review of the literature and discussions with RTW researchers conducted by a multidisciplinary group of academic researchers. Results: Our analysis suggests that RTW stakeholders can share the goal of a successful RTW; however, this consensus has to be viewed in light of other, sometimes competing, goals and the environments in which stakeholders operate. Conclusions: It is suggested that more clearly articulating and operationalizing stakeholders' perspectives will allow researchers to advance the understanding of RTW interventions and outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 556
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Feasibility of Family Group Conference to promote return-to-work of persons receiving work disability benefit
    Brongers, Kor A.
    Cornelius, Bert
    Roelofs, Pepijn D. D. M.
    van der Klink, Jac J. L.
    Brouwer, Sandra
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 42 (22) : 3227 - 3236
  • [32] How Well Do Return-to-work Interventions for Musculoskeletal Conditions Address the Multicausality of Work Disability?
    Catherine Briand
    Marie-José Durand
    Louise St-Arnaud
    Marc Corbière
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2008, 18 : 207 - 217
  • [33] Advances in Improving Return-to-Work Outcomes in Disability Compensation Contexts: From Research to Practice: Introduction to the Special Issue of Psychological Injury and Law on Return to Work
    Schultz I.Z.
    Warren P.
    Psychological Injury and Law, 2013, 6 (3) : 161 - 163
  • [34] Concussions and return-to-work considerations
    Rhine, David J.
    BRITISH COLUMBIA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 61 (02): : 92 - +
  • [35] A stakeholder-based system dynamics model of return-to-work: a research protocol
    Jetha, Arif
    Pransky, Glenn
    Fish, Jon
    Jeffries, Susan
    Hettinger, Lawrence J.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH, 2015, 4 (02)
  • [36] Navigating the Return-to-Work Road
    Tigerman, Marcy
    PROFESSIONAL CASE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 15 (04) : 225 - 227
  • [37] Use of Motivational Interviewing to Improve Return-to-work and Work-related Outcomes: A Review
    Page, Kathryn M.
    Tchernitskaia, Irina
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION COUNSELLING, 2014, 20 (01): : 38 - 49
  • [38] An Injury & Cost Assessment of a Return-To-Work Program: How beneficial can a return-to-work program be?
    Allen, R. G.
    Ritzel, D. O.
    Professional Safety, 42 (09):
  • [39] Employer attitudes, training, and return-to-work outcomes: A pilot study
    Pransky, G
    Shaw, W
    McLellan, R
    ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 13 (02) : 131 - 138
  • [40] Predictors of vocational rehabilitation return-to-work outcomes in workers' compensation
    Blackwell, TL
    Leierer, SJ
    Haupt, S
    Kampitsis, A
    REHABILITATION COUNSELING BULLETIN, 2003, 46 (02) : 108 - 114