Interference between postural control and spatial vs. non-spatial auditory reaction time tasks in older adults
被引:7
|
作者:
Fuhrman, Susan I.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Otolaryngol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USAUniv Pittsburgh, Dept Otolaryngol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
Fuhrman, Susan I.
[1
]
Redfern, Mark S.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Otolaryngol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Bioengn, Pittsburgh, PA USAUniv Pittsburgh, Dept Otolaryngol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
Redfern, Mark S.
[1
,2
]
Jennings, J. Richard
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USAUniv Pittsburgh, Dept Otolaryngol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
Jennings, J. Richard
[3
]
Furman, Joseph M.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Otolaryngol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Bioengn, Pittsburgh, PA USAUniv Pittsburgh, Dept Otolaryngol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
Furman, Joseph M.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Otolaryngol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Bioengn, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
This study investigated whether spatial aspects of an information processing task influence dual-task interference. Two groups (Older/Young) of healthy adults participated in dual-task experiments. Two auditory information processing tasks included a frequency discrimination choice reaction time task (non-spatial task) and a lateralization choice reaction time task (spatial task). Postural tasks included combinations of standing with eyes open or eyes closed on either a fixed floor or a sway-referenced floor. Reaction times and postural sway via center of pressure were recorded. Baseline measures of reaction time and sway were subtracted from the corresponding dual-task results to calculate reaction time task costs and postural task costs. Reaction time task cost increased with eye closure (p = 0.01), sway-referenced flooring (p < 0.0001), and the spatial task (p = 0.04). Additionally, a significant (p = 0.05) task x vision x age interaction indicated that older subjects had a significant vision X task interaction whereas young subjects did not. However, when analyzed by age group, the young group showed minimal differences in interference for the spatial and non-spatial tasks with eyes open, but showed increased interference on the spatial relative to non-spatial task with eyes closed. On the contrary, older subjects demonstrated increased interference on the spatial relative to the non-spatial task with eyes open, but not with eyes closed. These findings suggest that visual-spatial interference may occur in older subjects when vision is used to maintain posture.