A Pragmatic Master List of Action Verbs for Bloom's Taxonomy

被引:16
|
作者
Newton, Philip M. [1 ]
Da Silva, Ana [1 ]
Peters, Lee George [1 ]
机构
[1] Swansea Univ, Med Sch, Res Hlth Profess Educ, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
关键词
learning outcomes; pragmatism; evidence-based education; Blooms taxonomy; assessment; constructive alignment;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2020.00107
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Bloom's Taxonomy is an approach to organizing learning that was first published in 1956. It is ubiquitous in UK Higher Education (HE), where Universities use it as the basis for teaching and assessment; Learning Outcomes are created using suggested verbs for each tier of the taxonomy, and these are then "constructively aligned" to assessments. We conducted an analysis to determine whether there is consensus regarding the presentation of Bloom's Taxonomy across UK HE. Forty seven publicly available verb lists were collected from 35 universities and textbooks. There was very little agreement between these lists, most of which were not supported by evidence explaining where the verbs came from. We were able to construct a pragmatic "master list" of action verbs by using a simple majority consensus method. We were also able to construct a master list of commonly recommended "verbs to avoid." These master lists should be useful for anyone tasked with using Bloom's Taxonomy to write Learning Outcomes for assessment. However, our findings raise broader questions about the evidence base which underpins a common approach to teaching and assessment in UK HE and education generally.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Classification of Action Verbs of Bloom's Taxonomy Cognitive Domain: An Empirical Study
    Das, Syaamantak
    Das Mandal, Shyamal Kumar
    Basu, Anupam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION-US, 2022, 202 (04): : 554 - 566
  • [2] Bloom's Taxonomy
    Ortiz, Myralyn
    Kent, Denise
    Carlucci, Melissa
    Ricca, Paige
    Zeiher, Wendy
    Vanderzwan, Kathryn
    Betka, Alisha A.
    Kilroy, Susan
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR NURSES IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 39 (05) : E154 - E160
  • [3] Reevaluating Bloom's Taxonomy: What Measurable Verbs Can and Cannot Say about Student Learning
    Stanny, Claudia J.
    [J]. EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2016, 6 (04)
  • [4] Bloom's Butler's Taxonomy
    Panaram, Sasha Ann
    [J]. BLACK SCHOLAR, 2022, 52 (02): : 38 - 49
  • [5] Analysing learning outcomes in an Electrical Engineering curriculum using illustrative verbs derived from Bloom's Taxonomy
    Meda, Lawrence
    Swart, Arthur James
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2018, 43 (03) : 399 - 412
  • [6] A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview
    Krathwohl, DR
    [J]. THEORY INTO PRACTICE, 2002, 41 (04) : 212 - +
  • [7] The Cartesian Heritage of Bloom’s Taxonomy
    Brett Bertucio
    [J]. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 2017, 36 : 477 - 497
  • [8] The Cartesian Heritage of Bloom's Taxonomy
    Bertucio, Brett
    [J]. STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY AND EDUCATION, 2017, 36 (04) : 477 - 497
  • [9] This issue - Revising Bloom's taxonomy
    Anderson, LW
    [J]. THEORY INTO PRACTICE, 2002, 41 (04) : 210 - 211
  • [10] Reflections on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy
    Amer, Aly
    [J]. ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 4 (01) : 213 - 230