Regional biomechanical and failure properties of healthy human ascending aorta and root

被引:18
|
作者
Xuan, Yue
Wisneski, Andrew D.
Wang, Zhongjie
Lum, Matthew
Kumar, Shalni
Pallone, Julia
Flores, Nick
Inman, Justin
Lai, Lilian
Lin, Joanna
Guccione, Julius M.
Tseng, Elaine E.
Ge, Liang
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] San Francisco VA Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Ascending aorta; Healthy; Failure stress; Peak tangent modulus; Stretch; Biaxial; Biomechanics; Aortic dissection; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; INTERNATIONAL REGISTRY; DISSECTION; ANEURYSM; CRYOPRESERVATION; MANAGEMENT; ARTERIES; TISSUE; SINUS; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104705
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Purpose: Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening event that occurs when the intimal entry tear propagates and separates inner from outer layers of the aorta. Diameter, the current criterion for aneurysm repair, is far from ideal and additional evidence to optimize clinical decision would be extremely beneficial. Biomechanical investigation of the regional failure properties of aortic tissue is essential to understand and proactively prevent AD. We previously studied biaxial mechanical properties of healthy human aorta. In this study, we investigated the regional failure properties of healthy human ascending aorta (AscAo) including sinuses of Valsalva (SOV), and sinotubular junction (STJ). Results: A total of 430 intact tissue samples were harvested from 19 healthy donors whose hearts were excluded from heart transplantation. The donors had mean age of 51 +/- 11.7 years and nearly equal gender distribution. Samples were excised from aortic regions and subregions at defined locations. Tissue strips were subjected to either biaxial or uniaxial failure testing. Wall thickness varied regionally being thickest at AscAo (2.08 +/- 0.66 mm) and thinnest at SOV (1.46 +/- 0.31 mm). Biaxial testing demonstrated hyperplastic behavior of aortic tissues. Posterior and lateral STJ subregions were found to be stiffer than anterior and medial subregions in both circumferential and longitudinal directions. Failure stresses were significantly higher in the circumferential than longitudinal directions in each subregion of AscAo, STJ, and SOV. Longitudinal failure stresses were significantly greater in AscAo than those in STJ or SOV. Longitudinal failure stresses in AscAo were much smaller anteriorly than posteriorly, and medially than laterally. Conclusions: The finding of weakest region at the sinotubular junction along the longitudinal direction corroborates clinical observations of that region being commonly involved as the initial site of intimal tear in aortic dissections. Failure stretch ratios correlated to elastic modulus at each region. Furthermore, strong correlation was seen between STJ failure stresses and elastic modulus at physiological pressure along both circumferential and longitudinal directions. Correlating in-vivo aortic elastic modulus based on in-vivo imaging with experimentally determined elastic modulus at physiological pressure and failure stresses may potentially provide valuable information regarding aortic wall strength. Better understanding of aortic biomechanics in normal physiologic and aneurysmal pathologic states may aid in determining risk factors for predicting dissection in patient-specific fashion.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Longitudinal versus circumferential biomechanical behavior of the aneurysmal ascending aorta
    Kramer, Benjamin
    Thompson, Matthew A.
    Tarraf, Samar A.
    Vianna, Emily
    Gillespie, Callan
    Germano, Emidio
    Gentle, Brett
    Cikach, Frank
    Lowry, Ashley M.
    Pande, Amol
    Blackstone, Eugene
    Hargrave, Jennifer
    Colbrunn, Robb
    Bellini, Chiara
    Roselli, Eric E.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 168 (06):
  • [32] Biomechanical Properties of Human Aorta from Dynamic Biaxial Loading
    Kermani, Golriz
    Laksari, Kaveh
    Darvish, Kurosh
    2013 39TH ANNUAL NORTHEAST BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE (NEBEC 2013), 2013, : 90 - 91
  • [33] CT and MRI Assessment of the Aortic Root and Ascending Aorta
    Freeman, Laura A.
    Young, Phillip M.
    Foley, Thomas A.
    Williamson, Eric E.
    Bruce, Charles J.
    Greason, Kevin L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (06) : W581 - W592
  • [34] Effects of ascending aorta replacement on aortic root dilatation
    De Paulis, R
    Cetrano, E
    Moscarelli, M
    Andò, G
    Bertoldo, F
    Scaffa, R
    Tomai, F
    Chiariello, L
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2005, 27 (01) : 86 - 89
  • [35] Aortic root and ascending aorta replacement in pediatric patients
    Schlein, J.
    Pees, C.
    Greil, S.
    Wollenek, G.
    Simon, P.
    Michel-Behnke, I.
    Laufer, G.
    Zimpfer, D.
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2021, 133 (SUPPL 3) : S74 - S75
  • [36] Surgical Treatment of Ascending Aorta and Aortic Root Aneurysms
    David, Tirone E.
    PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2010, 52 (05) : 438 - 444
  • [37] Regional biomechanical characterization of human ascending aortic aneurysms: Microstructure and biaxial mechanical response
    Cosentino, Federica
    Sherifova, Selda
    Sommer, Gerhard
    Raffa, Giuseppe
    Pilato, Michele
    Pasta, Salvatore
    Holzapfel, Gerhard A.
    ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2023, 169 : 107 - 117
  • [38] Aortic Root and Ascending Aorta Replacement with Tricuspid Repair
    Saleem, Wardah
    Raheel, Furqan
    Iqbal, Fayaz
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2023, 33 (12): : 1465 - 1466
  • [39] Effect of aneurysm on the mechanical dissection properties of the human ascending thoracic aorta
    Pasta, Salvatore
    Phillippi, Julie A.
    Gleason, Thomas G.
    Vorp, David A.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 143 (02): : 460 - 467
  • [40] A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE MAIN PULMONARY ARTERY AND ASCENDING AORTA BIOMECHANICAL BEHAVIOR
    Fata, Bahar
    Galdi, Elena
    Sacks, Michael S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME SUMMER BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE 2011, PTS A AND B, 2011, : 811 - 812