Feasibility of a break-in period of less than 24 hours for urgent start peritoneal dialysis: a multicenter study

被引:9
|
作者
Wen, Xi [1 ]
Yang, Liming [2 ]
Sun, Zhanshan [3 ]
Zhang, Xiaoxuan [4 ]
Zhu, Xueyan [5 ]
Zhou, Wenhua [1 ]
Hu, Xiaoqing [1 ]
Liu, Shichen [1 ]
Luo, Ping [1 ]
Cui, Wenpeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Second Hosp Jilin Univ, Div Nephrol, 218 Zigiang St, Changchun 130041, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] First Hosp Jilin Univ, Div Nephrol, Changchun, Peoples R China
[3] Xinganmeng Peoples Hosp, Div Nephrol, Ulan Hot, Peoples R China
[4] Jilin FAW Gen Hosp, Div Nephrol, Changchun, Peoples R China
[5] Jilin City Cent Hosp, Div Nephrol, Jilin, Jilin, Peoples R China
关键词
Urgent start peritoneal dialysis; peritoneal dialysis; break-in period; complications; technique failure; CATHETER PLACEMENT; TERM OUTCOMES; INITIATION; IMPLANTATION; HEMODIALYSIS; ASSOCIATION; FAILURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/0886022X.2022.2049306
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose Urgent start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) is an effective therapeutic method for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, whether it is safe to initiate peritoneal dialysis (PD) within 24 h unclear. We examined the short-term outcomes of a break-in period (BI) of 24 h for patients undergoing USPD. Methods This real-world, multicenter, retrospective cohort study evaluated USPD patients from five centers from January 2013 to August 2020. Patients were divided into BI <= 24 h or BI > 24 h groups. The Primary outcomes included incidence of mechanical and infectious complications. The secondary outcome was technique failure. Moreover, we presented a subgroup analysis for patients who did not receive temporary hemodialysis (HD). Results A total of 871 USPD patients were included: 470 in the BI <= 24 h and 401 in the BI > 24 h groups. Mechanical and infectious complications did not differ between the two groups across the follow-up timepoints (2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months) (p > 0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that BI <= 24 h was not an independent risk factor for mechanical complications, catheter migration, or infectious complications (p > 0.05). A BI <= 24 h was not an independent significant risk factor for technique failure by multivariate Cox regression analysis (p > 0.05). The subgroup analysis of patients who did not receive temporary HD returned the same results. Conclusion Initiating PD within 24 h of catheter insertion was not associated with increased mechanical complications, infectious complications, or technique failures.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 460
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [21] Clinical feasibility of transfer to combined therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis for patients on peritoneal dialysis: A prospective multicenter study in Japan
    Maruyama, Yukio
    Yokoyama, Keitaro
    Higuchi, Chieko
    Sanaka, Tsutomu
    Tanaka, Yoshihide
    Sakai, Ken
    Kanno, Yoshihiko
    Ryuzaki, Munekazu
    Sakurada, Tsutomu
    Hosoya, Tatsuo
    Nakayama, Masaaki
    THERAPEUTIC APHERESIS AND DIALYSIS, 2022, 26 (06) : 1226 - 1234
  • [22] Immediate-start peritoneal dialysis without break-in- period: an 18-year retrospective cohort study on patient survival
    Lee, Jee Young
    Cho, Hyun-Jin
    Joo, Yoo-Sun
    Na, Hye-Jin
    Park, Jung-Hwan
    Jo, Young-Il
    KIDNEY RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2025, 44 (02) : 338 - 348
  • [23] Infectious and mechanical complications in planned-start vs. urgent-start peritoneal dialysis: a cohort study
    Costa Muller, Joao Victor
    Ponce, Daniela
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE NEFROLOGIA, 2023, 45 (01): : 27 - 35
  • [24] Risk factors for mortality within 6 mo in patients with diabetes undergoing urgent-start peritoneal dialysis: A multicenter retrospective cohort study
    Cheng, Si-Yu
    Yang, Li-Ming
    Sun, Zhan-Shan
    Zhang, Xiao-Xuan
    Zhu, Xue-Yan
    Meng, Ling-Fei
    Guo, Shi-Zheng
    Zhuang, Xiao-Hua
    Luo, Ping
    Cui, Wen-Peng
    WORLD JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2022, 13 (04) : 376 - 386
  • [25] EARLY AND LATE PATIENT OUTCOMES IN URGENT-START PERITONEAL DIALYSIS: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF UNPLANNED INITIATION OF CHRONIC DIALYSIS
    Ghita, Elbardai
    Chouhani, Basmat Amal
    Kabbali, Nadia
    Houssaini, Tarik Sqalli
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 38 : I882 - I882
  • [26] Outcomes of Medicare Patients Admitted for Less Than 24 Hours: an Observational Study
    Chen, Kevin
    Djulbegovic, Mia
    Agarwal, Ritu
    Chaudhry, Sarwat I.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 37 (06) : 1558 - 1560
  • [27] Outcomes of Medicare Patients Admitted for Less Than 24 Hours: an Observational Study
    Kevin Chen
    Mia Djulbegovic
    Ritu Agarwal
    Sarwat I. Chaudhry
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2022, 37 : 1558 - 1560
  • [28] Impact of unplanned peritoneal dialysis start on patients' outcomes-A multicenter cohort study
    Hangai, Kellen Thayanne
    Pecoits-Filho, Roberto
    Blake, Peter G.
    da Silva, Daniela Peruzzo
    Barretti, Pasqual
    de Moraes, Thyago Proenca
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [29] Automated peritoneal dialysis as a cost-effective urgent-start dialysis option for ESRD patients: A prospective cohort study
    Jin, Haijiao
    Lu, Renhua
    Lv, Shifan
    Wang, Ling
    Mou, Shan
    Zhang, Minfang
    Wang, Qin
    Pang, Huihua
    Yan, Hao
    Li, Zhenyuan
    Che, Miaoling
    Shen, Jianxiao
    Yan, Jiayi
    Gu, Aiping
    Zhang, Haifen
    Liu, Qian
    Fang, Nina
    Jin, Yan
    Ni, Zhaohui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2022, 45 (08): : 672 - 679
  • [30] FEASIBILITY OF URGENT-START PERITONEAL DIALYSIS IN OLDER PATIENTS WITH END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE
    Jin, Haijiao
    Ni, Zhaohui
    Mou, Shan
    Lu, Renhua
    Fang, Wei
    Huang, Jiaying
    Hu, Chunhua
    Zhang, Haifen
    Yan, Hao
    Li, Zhenyuan
    Yu, Zanzhe
    PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 38 (02): : 125 - 130