Feasibility of a break-in period of less than 24 hours for urgent start peritoneal dialysis: a multicenter study

被引:9
|
作者
Wen, Xi [1 ]
Yang, Liming [2 ]
Sun, Zhanshan [3 ]
Zhang, Xiaoxuan [4 ]
Zhu, Xueyan [5 ]
Zhou, Wenhua [1 ]
Hu, Xiaoqing [1 ]
Liu, Shichen [1 ]
Luo, Ping [1 ]
Cui, Wenpeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Second Hosp Jilin Univ, Div Nephrol, 218 Zigiang St, Changchun 130041, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] First Hosp Jilin Univ, Div Nephrol, Changchun, Peoples R China
[3] Xinganmeng Peoples Hosp, Div Nephrol, Ulan Hot, Peoples R China
[4] Jilin FAW Gen Hosp, Div Nephrol, Changchun, Peoples R China
[5] Jilin City Cent Hosp, Div Nephrol, Jilin, Jilin, Peoples R China
关键词
Urgent start peritoneal dialysis; peritoneal dialysis; break-in period; complications; technique failure; CATHETER PLACEMENT; TERM OUTCOMES; INITIATION; IMPLANTATION; HEMODIALYSIS; ASSOCIATION; FAILURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/0886022X.2022.2049306
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose Urgent start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) is an effective therapeutic method for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, whether it is safe to initiate peritoneal dialysis (PD) within 24 h unclear. We examined the short-term outcomes of a break-in period (BI) of 24 h for patients undergoing USPD. Methods This real-world, multicenter, retrospective cohort study evaluated USPD patients from five centers from January 2013 to August 2020. Patients were divided into BI <= 24 h or BI > 24 h groups. The Primary outcomes included incidence of mechanical and infectious complications. The secondary outcome was technique failure. Moreover, we presented a subgroup analysis for patients who did not receive temporary hemodialysis (HD). Results A total of 871 USPD patients were included: 470 in the BI <= 24 h and 401 in the BI > 24 h groups. Mechanical and infectious complications did not differ between the two groups across the follow-up timepoints (2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months) (p > 0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that BI <= 24 h was not an independent risk factor for mechanical complications, catheter migration, or infectious complications (p > 0.05). A BI <= 24 h was not an independent significant risk factor for technique failure by multivariate Cox regression analysis (p > 0.05). The subgroup analysis of patients who did not receive temporary HD returned the same results. Conclusion Initiating PD within 24 h of catheter insertion was not associated with increased mechanical complications, infectious complications, or technique failures.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 460
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Break-in Period ≤24 Hours as an Option for Urgent-start Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients With Diabetes
    Hu, Xiaoqing
    Yang, Liming
    Sun, Zhanshan
    Zhang, Xiaoxuan
    Zhu, Xueyan
    Zhou, Wenhua
    Wen, Xi
    Liu, Shichen
    Cui, Wenpeng
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [2] Safety of a 24-h-or-less break-in period in elderly patients undergoing urgent-start peritoneal dialysis: A multicenter retrospective cohort study
    Cheng, Siyu
    Yang, Liming
    Sun, Zhanshan
    Zhang, Xiaoxuan
    Zhu, Xueyan
    Meng, Lingfei
    Guo, Shizheng
    Zhuang, Xiaohua
    Luo, Ping
    Cui, Wenpeng
    THERAPEUTIC APHERESIS AND DIALYSIS, 2023, 27 (02) : 304 - 313
  • [3] Application of automated peritoneal dialysis in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis patients during the break-in period
    Shengmao Liu
    Xiaohua Zhuang
    Min Zhang
    Yanfeng Wu
    Min Liu
    Sibo Guan
    Shujun Liu
    Lining Miao
    Wenpeng Cui
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2018, 50 : 541 - 549
  • [4] Application of automated peritoneal dialysis in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis patients during the break-in period
    Liu, Shengmao
    Zhuang, Xiaohua
    Zhang, Min
    Wu, Yanfeng
    Liu, Min
    Guan, Sibo
    Liu, Shujun
    Miao, Lining
    Cui, Wenpeng
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 50 (03) : 541 - 549
  • [5] Percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation with no break-in period: a viable option for patients requiring unplanned urgent-start peritoneal dialysis
    Kim, Joo Hui
    Kim, Min Jeong
    Ye, Byung-Min
    Kim, June Hyun
    Kim, Seorin
    Kim, Il Young
    Kim, Hyo Jin
    Han, Miyeun
    Rhee, Harin
    Song, Sang Heon
    Seong, Eun Young
    Lee, Soo Bong
    Lee, Dong Won
    KIDNEY RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 39 (03) : 365 - 372
  • [6] EARLY TECHNICAL COMPLICATIONS AND LONG TERM SURVIVAL OF URGENT PERITONEAL DIALYSIS ACCORDING TO BREAK-IN PERIOD
    Kim, So Yeon
    Jeong, Hyo Jin
    Lee, Ji Young
    Lee, Su Mi
    Oh, You Jeong
    Nam, Hyun Kyung
    An, Won Suk
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 31 : 243 - 243
  • [7] Comparison of immediate-start peritoneal dialysis without break-in period and conventional-start peritoneal dialysis: a two-center retrospective audit
    Wongpraphairot, Suwikran
    Choopun, Kitjapong
    Sriphatphiriyakun, Tharinee
    Titawatanakul, Apiradee
    Chongsuvivatwong, Virasakdi
    Phongphithakchai, Atthaphong
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 56 (07) : 2403 - 2409
  • [8] IMPACT OF BREAK-IN PERIOD ON THE SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS STARTED ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS
    Liu, Yaorong
    Zhang, Lin
    Lin, Aiwu
    Ni, Zhaohui
    Qian, Jiaqi
    Fang, Wei
    PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 34 (01): : 49 - 56
  • [9] Peritoneal catheter-related complications: A comparison between hemodialysis and intermittent peritoneal dialysis in the break-in period
    Cheng, YL
    Chau, KF
    Choi, KS
    Wong, FKM
    Cheng, HM
    Li, CS
    ADVANCES IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS/1996, VOL 12, 1996, 12 : 231 - 234
  • [10] Early technical complications and long-term survival of urgent peritoneal dialysis according to break-in periods
    Kim, Kitae
    Son, Young Ki
    Lee, Su Mi
    Kim, Seong Eun
    An, Won Suk
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (10):