Prediction and evolution of drop-size distribution for a new ultrasonic atomizer

被引:8
|
作者
Tembely, Moussa [1 ]
Lecot, Christian [2 ]
Soucemarianadin, Arthur [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Grenoble, Lab Geophys & Ind Fluid Flows, UMR 5519, F-38041 Grenoble, France
[2] Univ Savoie, Lab Appl Math, UMR CNRS 5127, F-73376 Le Bourget Du Lac, France
关键词
Nozzle conveying fluid; Spray; Maximum entropy formalism; Monte Carlo method; Coalescence; MAXIMUM-ENTROPY FORMALISM; SPRAYS; ATOMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.09.027
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Complete modeling of a new ultrasonic atomizer, the Spray On Demand (SOD) printhead, was carried out to enable its optimization. The modeling was focused on various factors, including nozzle vibrations and a theoretical prediction of the SOD drop-size distribution. Assuming that the spray is generated based on Faraday instability, a prediction of the drop-size distribution within the framework of a specific and general Maximum Entropy Formalism (MEF) was developed. This prediction was formulated using the conservation laws of energy and mass, as well as the three-parameter generalized Gamma distribution. After establishing an analytical expression to estimate the Sauter Mean Diameter, a qualitative validation of the model was performed by comparing predictions with experimental measurements of the drop-size distribution. The dynamic model is shown to be sensitive to operating conditions and physical properties of the fluid. The prediction capabilities of the model were found to be adequate, paving the way for optimization of the atomizer. The evolution of the drop-size distribution, under the coalescence effect, was also assessed using a convergent Monte Carlo method to solve the distribution equation. This was formulated in a mass flow algorithm, leading to a more physically relevant distribution. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 667
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] VARIATION WITH ALTITUDE OF THE DROP-SIZE DISTRIBUTION IN STEADY LIGHT RAIN
    ROGERS, RR
    ZAWADZKI, II
    GOSSARD, EE
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1991, 117 (502) : 1341 - 1369
  • [22] On evolution of drop-size distributions in turbulent pipe flow revisited
    Ramkrishna, Doraiswami
    Nere, Nandkishor K.
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2006, 45 (22) : 7673 - 7678
  • [23] DROP-SIZE DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SPILL-RETURN ATOMIZERS
    RIZK, NK
    LEFEBVRE, AH
    JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 1985, 1 (01) : 16 - 22
  • [24] A new formulation of the Maximum Entropy Formalism to model liquid spray drop-size distribution
    Dumouchel, Christophe
    PARTICLE & PARTICLE SYSTEMS CHARACTERIZATION, 2007, 23 (06) : 468 - 479
  • [25] Drop-size distribution characteristics in tropical mesoscale convective systems
    Cifelli, R
    Williams, CR
    Rajopadhyaya, DK
    Avery, SK
    Gage, KS
    May, PT
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY, 2000, 39 (06): : 760 - 777
  • [26] The bias in moment estimators for parameters of drop-size distribution functions
    Smith, PL
    Kliche, DV
    31ST CONFERENCE ON RADAR METEOROLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 47 - 50
  • [27] On the capability of the generalized gamma function to represent spray drop-size distribution
    Lecompte, Matthieu
    Dumouchel, Christophe
    PARTICLE & PARTICLE SYSTEMS CHARACTERIZATION, 2008, 25 (02) : 154 - 167
  • [28] Flight line variability in rotary atomizer drop size distribution
    Continuum Dynamics, Inc., 34 Lexington Avenue, Ewing, NJ, 08618, United States
    不详
    不详
    不详
    不详
    J. ASTM Int., 2006, 1 (405-413):
  • [29] Flight line variability in rotary atomizer drop size distribution
    Teske, Milton E.
    Thistle, Harold W.
    Reardon, Richard C.
    Davies, David C.
    Cormier, Gerry
    Cameron, R. Scott
    LeClerc, Monique Y.
    Karipot, Anandakumar
    PESTICIDE FORMULATIONS AND DELIVERY SYSTEMS, 25TH VOLUME: ADVANCES IN CROP PROTECTION TECHNOLOGIES, 2006, 1470 : 168 - +
  • [30] DROP-SIZE HISTORY DURING A SHOWER
    ATLAS, D
    PLANK, VG
    JOURNAL OF METEOROLOGY, 1953, 10 (04): : 291 - 295