Probabilistic safety assessment-based importance analysis of cyber-attacks on nuclear power plants

被引:12
|
作者
Park, Jong Woo [1 ]
Lee, Seung Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIST, Dept Nucl Engn, 50 UNIST Gil, Ulsan 44919, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Probabilistic safety assessment; Cyber security; Cyber-attacks; Nuclear power plant; Critical digital asset; SECURITY RISK-ASSESSMENT; C SYSTEMS; SCADA;
D O I
10.1016/j.net.2018.09.009
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
With the application of digital technology to safety-critical infrastructures, cyber-attacks have emerged as one of the new dangerous threats. In safety-critical infrastructures such as a nuclear power plant (NPP), a cyber-attack could have serious consequences by initiating dangerous events or rendering important safety systems unavailable. Since a cyber-attack is conducted intentionally, numerous possible cases should be considered for developing a cyber security system, such as the attack paths, methods, and potential target systems. Therefore, prior to developing a risk-informed cyber security strategy, the importance of cyber-attacks and significant critical digital assets (CDAs) should be analyzed. In this work, an importance analysis method for cyber-attacks on an NPP was proposed using the probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) method. To develop an importance analysis framework for cyber-attacks, possible cyber-attacks were identified with failure modes, and a PSA model for cyber-attacks was developed. For case studies, the quantitative evaluations of cyber-attack scenarios were performed using the proposed method. By using quantitative importance of cyber-attacks and identifying significant CDAs that must be defended against cyber-attacks, it is possible to develop an efficient and reliable defense strategy against cyber-attacks on NPPs. (C) 2018 Korean Nuclear Society, Published by Elsevier Korea LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 145
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mathematical Formulation and Analytic Solutions for Uncertainty Analysis in Probabilistic Safety Assessment of Nuclear Power Plants
    Song, Gyun Seob
    Kim, Man Cheol
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (04)
  • [22] PDE-based Analysis of Automotive Cyber-Attacks on Highways
    Ghanavati, Meysam
    Chakravarthy, Animesh
    Menon, Prathyush
    [J]. 2017 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2017, : 1833 - 1838
  • [23] PDE-based Analysis of Cyber-Attacks in Vehicle Swarms
    Ghanavati, Meysam
    Chakravarthy, Animesh
    Menon, Prathyush
    [J]. 2018 IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2018, : 1329 - 1334
  • [24] Probabilistic safety assessment for instrumentation and control systems in nuclear power plants: An overview
    Lu, LX
    Jiang, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 41 (03) : 323 - 330
  • [25] Power System Adequacy Assessment with Probabilistic Cyber Attacks Against Breakers
    Xiang, Yingmeng
    Wang, Lingfeng
    Zhang, Yichi
    [J]. 2014 IEEE PES GENERAL MEETING - CONFERENCE & EXPOSITION, 2014,
  • [26] PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT FOR NON-FULL-POWER STATES OF NUCLEAR-POWER-PLANTS
    MULLERECKER, D
    SIMON, M
    [J]. KERNTECHNIK, 1995, 60 (2-3) : 122 - 129
  • [27] Incorporating organizational factors into probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants through canonical probabilistic models
    Galan, S. F.
    Mosleh, A.
    Izquierdo, J. M.
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2007, 92 (08) : 1131 - 1138
  • [28] Risk-based contingency analysis for power systems considering a combination of different types of cyber-attacks
    Zhao, Yirui
    Li, Yong
    Cao, Yijia
    Yan, Mingyu
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 348
  • [29] An Ensemble Learning-Based Cyber-Attacks Detection Method of Cyber-Physical Power Systems
    Lu, Kang-Di
    Wu, Zheng-Guang
    [J]. 2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED ROBOTICS AND MECHATRONICS (ICARM 2022), 2022, : 1029 - 1034
  • [30] A method to improve cutset probability calculation in probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants
    Jung, Woo Sik
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 134 : 134 - 142