Predicting ligand binding affinity using on- and off-rates for the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge

被引:32
|
作者
Dixon, Tom [1 ,2 ]
Lotz, Samuel D. [1 ]
Dickson, Alex [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Computat Math Sci & Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
SAMPL6; Kinetics; Binding affinity; Molecular dynamics; Weighted ensemble; WExplore; REVO; Rare events; ENSEMBLE BROWNIAN DYNAMICS; WEIGHTED-ENSEMBLE; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; PROTEIN ASSOCIATION; BLIND PREDICTION; SIMULATION; METADYNAMICS; COMPUTATION; INHIBITOR; KINETICS;
D O I
10.1007/s10822-018-0149-3
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Interest in ligand binding kinetics has been growing rapidly, as it is being discovered in more and more systems that ligand residence time is the crucial factor governing drug efficacy. Many enhanced sampling methods have been developed with the goal of predicting ligand binding rates (k(on)) and/or ligand unbinding rates (k(off)) through explicit simulation of ligand binding pathways, and these methods work by very different mechanisms. Although there is not yet a blind challenge for ligand binding kinetics, here we take advantage of experimental measurements and rigorously computed benchmarks to compare estimates of K-D calculated as the ratio of two rates: k(off)/k(on). These rates were determined using a new enhanced sampling method based on the weighted ensemble framework that we call "REVO": Reweighting of Ensembles by Variance Optimization. This is a further development of the WExplore enhanced sampling method, in which trajectory cloning and merging steps are guided not by the definition of sampling regions, but by maximizing trajectory variance. Here we obtain estimates of k(on) and k(off) that are consistent across multiple simulations, with an average log10-scale standard deviation of 0.28 for on-rates and 0.56 for off-rates, which is well within an order of magnitude and far better than previously observed for previous applications of the WExplore algorithm. Our rank ordering of the three host-guest pairs agrees with the reference calculations, however our predicted Delta G values were systematically lower than the reference by an average of 4.2 kcal/mol. Using tree network visualizations of the trajectories in the REVO algorithm, and conformation space networks for each system, we analyze the results of our sampling, and hypothesize sources of discrepancy between our K-D values and the reference. We also motivate the direct inclusion of k(on) and k(off) challenges in future iterations of SAMPL, to further develop the field of ligand binding kinetics prediction and modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1012
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [31] Comparison of the umbrella sampling and the double decoupling method in binding free energy predictions for SAMPL6 octa-acid host–guest challenges
    Naohiro Nishikawa
    Kyungreem Han
    Xiongwu Wu
    Florentina Tofoleanu
    Bernard R. Brooks
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2018, 32 : 1075 - 1086
  • [32] Prediction of CB[8] host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL6 using the double-decoupling method
    Han, Kyungreem
    Hudson, Phillip S.
    Jones, Michael R.
    Nishikawa, Naohiro
    Tofoleanu, Florentina
    Brooks, Bernard R.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2018, 32 (10) : 1059 - 1073
  • [33] Comparison of the umbrella sampling and the double decoupling method in binding free energy predictions for SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenges
    Nishikawa, Naohiro
    Han, Kyungreem
    Wu, Xiongwu
    Tofoleanu, Florentina
    Brooks, Bernard R.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2018, 32 (10) : 1075 - 1086
  • [34] Effective Estimation of Ligand-Binding Affinity Using Biased Sampling Method
    Son Tung Ngo
    Vu, Khanh B.
    Le Minh Bui
    Vu, Van V.
    ACS OMEGA, 2019, 4 (02): : 3887 - 3893
  • [35] Predicting poses and binding affinity of CSAR ligands using structure based and ligand based approaches
    Fourches, Denis
    Muratov, Eugene
    Ding, Feng
    Tripathy, Ashutosh
    Dokholyan, Nikolay
    Tropsha, Alexander
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 244
  • [36] Predicting Binding Affinity of CSAR Ligands Using Both Structure-Based and Ligand-Based Approaches
    Fourches, Denis
    Muratov, Eugene
    Ding, Feng
    Dokholyan, Nikolay V.
    Tropsha, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2013, 53 (08) : 1915 - 1922
  • [37] CYP 2D6 Binding Affinity Predictions Using Multiple Ligand and Protein Conformations
    Peric-Hassler, Lovorka
    Stjernschantz, Eva
    Oostenbrink, Chris
    Geerke, Daan P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2013, 14 (12) : 24514 - 24530
  • [38] Predicting binding poses and affinity ranking in D3R Grand Challenge using PL-PatchSurfer2.0
    Shin, Woong-Hee
    Kihara, Daisuke
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2019, 33 (12) : 1083 - 1094
  • [39] Predicting binding poses and affinity ranking in D3R Grand Challenge using PL-PatchSurfer2.0
    Woong-Hee Shin
    Daisuke Kihara
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2019, 33 : 1083 - 1094
  • [40] Predicting ligand-binding differences of α1 subtype and α6 subtype of GABAA receptor using molecular modeling
    Ren, Tian-Rui
    Ci, Su-Qin
    Su, Zhi-Guo
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE-THEOCHEM, 2007, 816 (1-3): : 5 - 11