Predicting ligand binding affinity using on- and off-rates for the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge

被引:32
|
作者
Dixon, Tom [1 ,2 ]
Lotz, Samuel D. [1 ]
Dickson, Alex [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Computat Math Sci & Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
SAMPL6; Kinetics; Binding affinity; Molecular dynamics; Weighted ensemble; WExplore; REVO; Rare events; ENSEMBLE BROWNIAN DYNAMICS; WEIGHTED-ENSEMBLE; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; PROTEIN ASSOCIATION; BLIND PREDICTION; SIMULATION; METADYNAMICS; COMPUTATION; INHIBITOR; KINETICS;
D O I
10.1007/s10822-018-0149-3
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Interest in ligand binding kinetics has been growing rapidly, as it is being discovered in more and more systems that ligand residence time is the crucial factor governing drug efficacy. Many enhanced sampling methods have been developed with the goal of predicting ligand binding rates (k(on)) and/or ligand unbinding rates (k(off)) through explicit simulation of ligand binding pathways, and these methods work by very different mechanisms. Although there is not yet a blind challenge for ligand binding kinetics, here we take advantage of experimental measurements and rigorously computed benchmarks to compare estimates of K-D calculated as the ratio of two rates: k(off)/k(on). These rates were determined using a new enhanced sampling method based on the weighted ensemble framework that we call "REVO": Reweighting of Ensembles by Variance Optimization. This is a further development of the WExplore enhanced sampling method, in which trajectory cloning and merging steps are guided not by the definition of sampling regions, but by maximizing trajectory variance. Here we obtain estimates of k(on) and k(off) that are consistent across multiple simulations, with an average log10-scale standard deviation of 0.28 for on-rates and 0.56 for off-rates, which is well within an order of magnitude and far better than previously observed for previous applications of the WExplore algorithm. Our rank ordering of the three host-guest pairs agrees with the reference calculations, however our predicted Delta G values were systematically lower than the reference by an average of 4.2 kcal/mol. Using tree network visualizations of the trajectories in the REVO algorithm, and conformation space networks for each system, we analyze the results of our sampling, and hypothesize sources of discrepancy between our K-D values and the reference. We also motivate the direct inclusion of k(on) and k(off) challenges in future iterations of SAMPL, to further develop the field of ligand binding kinetics prediction and modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1012
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Predicting ligand binding affinity using on- and off-rates for the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge
    Tom Dixon
    Samuel D. Lotz
    Alex Dickson
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2018, 32 : 1001 - 1012
  • [2] Overview of the SAMPL6 host–guest binding affinity prediction challenge
    Andrea Rizzi
    Steven Murkli
    John N. McNeill
    Wei Yao
    Matthew Sullivan
    Michael K. Gilson
    Michael W. Chiu
    Lyle Isaacs
    Bruce C. Gibb
    David L. Mobley
    John D. Chodera
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2018, 32 : 937 - 963
  • [3] Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge
    Rizzi, Andrea
    Murkli, Steven
    McNeill, John N.
    Yao, Wei
    Sullivan, Matthew
    Gilson, Michael K.
    Chiu, Michael W.
    Isaacs, Lyle
    Gibb, Bruce C.
    Mobley, David L.
    Chodera, John D.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2018, 32 (10) : 937 - 963
  • [4] The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations
    Rizzi, Andrea
    Jensen, Travis
    Slochower, David R.
    Aldeghi, Matteo
    Gapsys, Vytautas
    Ntekoumes, Dimitris
    Bosisio, Stefano
    Papadourakis, Michail
    Henriksen, Niel M.
    de Groot, Bert L.
    Cournia, Zoe
    Dickson, Alex
    Michel, Julien
    Gilson, Michael K.
    Shirts, Michael R.
    Mobley, David L.
    Chodera, John D.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2020, 34 (05) : 601 - 633
  • [5] The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations
    Andrea Rizzi
    Travis Jensen
    David R. Slochower
    Matteo Aldeghi
    Vytautas Gapsys
    Dimitris Ntekoumes
    Stefano Bosisio
    Michail Papadourakis
    Niel M. Henriksen
    Bert L. de Groot
    Zoe Cournia
    Alex Dickson
    Julien Michel
    Michael K. Gilson
    Michael R. Shirts
    David L. Mobley
    John D. Chodera
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2020, 34 : 601 - 633
  • [6] On the NS-DSSB unidirectional estimates in the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge
    Piero Procacci
    Marina Macchiagodena
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2021, 35 : 1055 - 1065
  • [7] On the NS-DSSB unidirectional estimates in the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge
    Procacci, Piero
    Macchiagodena, Marina
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2021, 35 (10) : 1055 - 1065
  • [8] SAMPL6 host–guest challenge: binding free energies via a multistep approach
    Yiğitcan Eken
    Prajay Patel
    Thomas Díaz
    Michael R. Jones
    Angela K. Wilson
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2018, 32 : 1097 - 1115
  • [9] The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting aqueous pKa values from EC-RISM theory
    Nicolas Tielker
    Lukas Eberlein
    Stefan Güssregen
    Stefan M. Kast
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2018, 32 : 1151 - 1163
  • [10] The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting aqueous pKa values from EC-RISM theory
    Tielker, Nicolas
    Eberlein, Lukas
    Guessregen, Stefan
    Kast, Stefan M.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2018, 32 (10) : 1151 - 1163